Scoping reviews of innovations in health care characterized by large numbers and types of
publications present a unique challenge. A novel software application, Synthesis, can …

Objective: The aim of this study was to define reporting standards for IDEAL format studies.
Background: The IDEAL Framework and Recommendations establish an integrated …

As systematic review papers on the same topic continue to be published, a massive amount
of information pours down on the readers, a trend that gradually amplifies like a tsunami …

Introduction The PROCESS guideline was developed in 2016 through expert Delphi
consensus. It aimed to improve the quality of reporting of surgical case series. This study …

METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
extension for scoping reviews guidelines, we searched PubMed from 2000 to 2022 to …

Objective: To evaluate the quality of reporting of surgical randomized controlled trials
published in surgical and general medical journals using Jadad score, allocation …

Background A proliferation of work on surgical quality improvement has brought about an
increase in quality improvement publications. We assessed the quality of surgical quality …

CONCLUSIONS This review demonstrates that although very good compliance was
observed for particular QUOROM guidelines, a remarkable number of studies failed to follow …

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in surgery can provide valuable
evidence of the efficacy of interventions if they are well-designed, appropriately executed …

Objective: Evidence-based surgery is predicated on the quality of published literature. We
measured the quality of surgery manuscripts selected by peer review and identified …