Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CJS
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CJS

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CJS on Twitter
Quill on Scalpel

The management of trauma in Canada

Michael Gross
CAN J SURG February 01, 2000 43 (1) 9;
Michael Gross
Professor of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS. Member, Editorial Board, Canadian Journal of Surgery
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In this issue of the Journal (page 23), Kortbeek has reviewed the treatment of trauma in Canada, using Calgary as an example.

There are some important lessons to be learnt from the trauma experience. The first is that trauma in Canada was only advanced when there was a multidisciplinary group of interested participants who used American College of Surgeons documents as a basis to set up a uniquely Canadian system. The second is that the trauma system concentrates expertise in the delivery of care in surgery care centres but is heavily dependent on good communication and outcome analysis to demonstrate the efficacy of these tertiary care centres. The third, and probably most important, is the growing understanding that most of the tools used to analyse trauma outcomes are somewhat crude and are not easily applied to all patients who present to a trauma centre. Any trauma registry is only as good as the information put into it. Analysis of trauma injury severity can demonstrate differences between centres but is not always applicable to all patients, and crude analysis of death and morbidity does not allow for adequate understanding of disabilities after treatment at a trauma centre and their impact on the population and on individuals.

In some respects trauma systems seem to have come of age. Significant Canadian statistics demonstrate that centralized trauma treatment programs are of benefit to trauma victims. Increased sophistication in the analysis of treatment programs is required. Appropriate evaluation of the costs to the community and to the individuals and the disabilities suffered as a result of the treatment of trauma are necessary. For example, an analysis of the outcomes of head injury would demonstrate an increased number of patients who are disabled as a result of their trauma but who according to the overall Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) have done very well. The cost and impact of those disabled patients on their families and their caregivers are as yet unexplored. More research in this area must be done by dedicated scientists with epidemiologic training and understanding if the case is going to be made for continuing the traditional postinjury trauma treatment.

Dr. Kortbeek does discuss injury control, and again Alberta has demonstrated the way with a program aimed at teenagers and the effects of drinking and driving. The question must still be asked as to whether the trauma systems of Canada have had more of an impact on legislation with respect to drinking and driving than Mothers Against Drunk Driving.

Trauma treatment is an excellent ex ample of a situation in which a more aggressive approach to prevention has to involve political action, based on expert results from expert centres and a clearer identification of the problems. If future Canadian trauma victims are to be appropriately treated, it behooves us as a profession to become more active in delineating the true costs to society and invoking the appropriate processes of education, prevention and indeed punishment for recidivists such as recurrent drunk drivers.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Journal of Surgery: 43 (1)
CAN J SURG
Vol. 43, Issue 1
1 Feb 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CJS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The management of trauma in Canada
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CJS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CJS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The management of trauma in Canada
Michael Gross
CAN J SURG Feb 2000, 43 (1) 9;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
The management of trauma in Canada
Michael Gross
CAN J SURG Feb 2000, 43 (1) 9;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Submit a manuscript

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CJS represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

View CMA's Accessibility policy.

Powered by HighWire