Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CJS
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CJS

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CJS on Twitter
Continuing Medical Education

Surgical Education and Self-assessment Program (SESAP)

CAN J SURG December 01, 2003 46 (6) 467;
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Category 14, Item 27

Question

A 38-year-old 65-kg woman sustains a severe pulmonary contusion and requires mechanical ventilatory support. Which of the following is most likely to lead to ventilator-induced lung injury?

  1. Fio2 0.5

  2. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) + 10 cm H2O

  3. Pressure support 12 cm H2O

  4. Inverse ratio ventilation 2:1

  5. Tidal volume 800 mL

For the question above, select the lettered answer that is best of the 5 given.

Critique

Ventilator-induced lung injury is associated with repetitive expansion and collapse of small airways and alveoli with positive pressure ventilation. It is believed to contribute to the lung inflammation seen in the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The principal strategy for reducing the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury is to use smaller tidal volumes than the 12 to 15 mL/kg that were used previously. An initial tidal volume of 8 to 10 mL/kg is currently recommended.

A tidal volume of 800 mL for this 65-kg woman is excessive. A pressure support level of 12 cm H2O would be unlikely to deliver a high tidal volume in the setting of pulmonary contusion. The other settings listed primarily affect oxygenation and may be required in this situation to maintain PO2.

Footnotes

  • (Reproduced by permission from SESAP No. 11 2002–2004 Syllabus, volume 2. For enrolment in the Surgical Education and Self-Assessment Program, please apply to the American College of Surgeons, 633 North St. Clair St., Chicago IL 60611-3211, USA; tel 312 202-5000; fax 312 202-5001; postmaster{at}facs.org)

References

    1. Meade MO,
    2. Cook DJ,
    3. Kernerman P,
    4. Bernard G
    : How to use articles about harm: The relationship between high tidal volumes, ventilating pressures, and ventilator-induced lung injury. Crit Care Med 25:1915–1922, 1997
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ranieri VM,
    2. Suter PM,
    3. Tortorella C,
    4. et al
    : Effect of mechanical ventilation on inflammatory mediators in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 282:54–61, 1999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Journal of Surgery: 46 (6)
CAN J SURG
Vol. 46, Issue 6
1 Dec 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CJS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Surgical Education and Self-assessment Program (SESAP)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CJS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CJS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Surgical Education and Self-assessment Program (SESAP)
CAN J SURG Dec 2003, 46 (6) 467;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Surgical Education and Self-assessment Program (SESAP)
CAN J SURG Dec 2003, 46 (6) 467;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Submit a manuscript

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CJS represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

View CMA's Accessibility policy.

Powered by HighWire