Open appendectomy for pediatric ruptured appendicitis: a historical clinical review of the prophylaxis of wound infection and postoperative intra-abdominal abscess
===================================================================================================================================================================

* Sigmund H. Ein
* Ahmed Nasr
* Arlene Ein

## Abstract

**Background:** We conducted a 3-decade clinical review of prophylaxis for wound infection and postoperative intra-abdominal abscess after open appendectomy for pediatric ruptured appendicitis.

**Methods:** We reviewed the charts of patients with ruptured appendicitis who underwent open appendectomy performed by the same pediatric surgeon at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada between 1969 and 2003, inclusive. We evaluated 3 types of prophylaxis: subcutaneous (SC) antibiotic powder, peritoneal wound drain and intravenous (IV) antibiotics. We divided the sample into 4 treatment groups: peritoneal wound drain alone (group 1); peritoneal wound drain, SC antibiotic powder and IV antibiotics (group 2); SC antibiotic powder and IV antibiotics (group 3); and IV antibiotics alone (group 4). We used the χ2 test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

**Results:** There were 496 patients: 348 (70%) boys and 148 (30%) girls, with a mean age of 7 (range newborn to 17) years. There were 90 (18%) wound infections. Compared with the current standard of practice, IV antibiotics alone (group 4), peritoneal wound drain (group 1) was associated with the lowest number of wound infections (7 [7%], *p* = 0.023). There were 43 (9%) postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses. Compared with IV antibiotics alone, SC antibiotic powder with IV antibiotics (group 3) was associated with the lowest number of postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses (14 [6%], *p* = 0.06).

**Conclusion:** Over a 35-year period of open appendectomy for pediatric ruptured appendicitis, wound infection was least frequent in patients who received prophylactic peritoneal wound drain, and postoperative intra-abdominal abscess was least frequent in those who received prophylactic SC antibiotic powder and IV antibiotics.

Wound infection and postoperative intra-abdominal abscess following open appendectomy for ruptured appendicitis in infants and children have been ongoing problems, with much discussion in the literature.1–70 This paper is a 3-decade clinical review of open appendectomy for pediatric ruptured appendicitis that addresses these 2 predefined specific adverse events.

## Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of pediatric patients with ruptured appendicitis who had an open appendectomy performed by the same surgeon (S.H.E.) at the Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, Canada, between 1969 and 2003, inclusive. Patients who underwent delayed (interval, secondary) appendectomy for ruptured appendicitis were excluded from this study. We evaluated 3 types of prophylaxis for wound infection and postoperative intra-abdominal abscess: subcutaneous (SC) antibiotic powder, peritoneal wound drain and intravenous (IV) antibiotics. We divided the sample into 4 treatment groups:

*   peritoneal wound drain alone (group 1);

*   peritoneal wound drain, SC antibiotic powder and IV antibiotics (group 2);

*   SC antibiotic powder and IV antibiotics (group 3); and

*   IV antibiotics alone (group 4).

This study received SickKids Research Ethics Board approval (1000009774).

### Procedure

All operations involved a Rockey–Davis modification of a McBurney incision under general anesthesia.1 Cautery and chromic catgut sutures were used throughout for hemostasis. The appendiceal stump was cauterized and not inverted.2 Gross peritoneal contamination (pus) was removed by suction. Irrigation and intraperitoneal antibiotics were not used. In patients treated between 1969 and 1998, wound closure was with chromic catgut. In those treated between 1999 and 2003, external oblique and Scarpa fascia were closed with polyglactin 910 absorbable suture (Vicryl, Ethicon Inc.). In patients treated between 1969 and 1985, skin closure was done with silk sutures, and in those treated between 1968 and 2003 it was done with staples.

From 1969 to 1975, a peritoneal drain was brought from the pelvis out through the wound. From 1976 to 1980, the peritoneal wound drain above the external oblique fascia was brought out through a skin stab wound below the incision. The peritoneal wound drain was discontinued after 1980. Prophylaxis with SC antibiotic powder3 involved placing the powder in the SC space (ampicillin 1976–1981, cefoxitin 1982–2003). If the infant or child was allergic to penicillin, no antibiotic powder was used in the wound. When systemic antibiotics were used, they were all given intravenously: either cefoxitin or triple antibiotics (ampicillin, clindamycin or metronidazole, gentamicin) preoperatively, and triple antibiotics postoperatively for 5–14 days, depending upon the patient’s clinical course. If the infant or child was allergic to penicillin, cefoxitin and/or ampicillin were not used. No patient was given oral antibiotics in hospital or after discharge.

The definition of a wound infection was pus draining from between the stitches or staples. A postoperative intra-abdominal abscess was diagnosed based on the presence of fever, abdominal pain and/or gastrointestinal dysfunction and confirmed by radiological evidence of an intra-abdominal fluid collection.4

Postoperative care was the same for all patients. Follow-up continued until the patient was back to normal in all respects.

### Statistical analysis

We compared the current standard of practice, IV antibiotics alone (group 4) with all other prophylaxis (groups 1–3) using the χ2 test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

## Results

### Study sample

Our sample included 496 patients: 348 (70%) boys and 148 (30%) girls, with a mean age of 7 (range newborn to 17) years. Each of the 4 groups included 67–254 patients and covered 5–17 years of the study period (Table 1).

View this table:
[Table 1](http://canjsurg.ca/content/56/3/E7/T1)

Table 1 
Three types of prophylaxis for postoperative wound infection and intra-abdominal abscess in children with ruptured appendicitis

### Wound infection

There were 90 (18%) wound infections, which occurred between 1 and 2 weeks postoperatively (Tables 1 and 2). No organism was cultured in 80% of these infections; *Escherichia coli* was the most common (12%). Compared with IV antibiotics (group 4), peritoneal wound drain alone (group 1) was associated with the lowest number of wound infections (7 [7%], *p* = 0.023; Table 2).

View this table:
[Table 2](http://canjsurg.ca/content/56/3/E7/T2)

Table 2 
Comparison of the rate of postoperative complications associated with the current standard of practice, IV antibiotic prophylaxis (group 4), and that associated with all other prophylaxis (groups 1–3)

Of all 175 children who had a peritoneal wound drain (groups 1 and 2), regardless of other specific wound and peritoneal treatment and/or IV antibiotics, a wound infection developed in 17 (10%; Table 3). By comparison, of the 321 children who had no peritoneal wound drain (groups 3 and 4), regardless of other specific wound treatment and/or IV antibiotics, a wound infection developed in 73 (23%; Table 1).

View this table:
[Table 3](http://canjsurg.ca/content/56/3/E7/T3)

Table 3 
Combination of treatment groups with 3 types of prophylaxis for postoperative wound infections and intra-abdominal abscess in children with ruptured appendicitis

### Postoperative intra-abdominal abscess

There were 43 (9%) postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses, which occurred between 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively (Tables 1 and 2). Most abscesses contained no organism; however, of those that did, *E. coli* was the most common, followed by *Staphylocuccus* (*epidermidis*, *aureus*), streptococcus (enteric, nonhemolytic, viridans), bacteroides and *Klebsiella aerogenes*. Compared with IV antibiotics alone (group 4), prophylaxis with SC antibiotic powder and IV antibiotics (group 3) was associated with the lowest number of postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses (14 [6%], *p* = 0.06; Table 2).

Of all 391 children who had IV antibiotics (groups 2–4), regardless of other specific wound and peritoneal treatment, postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses developed in 21 (5%; Table 3). By comparison, of the 105 children who had no IV antibiotics (group 1), regardless of other specific wound and peritoneal treatment, postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses developed in 12 (11%; Table 2).

All patients recovered well; there were no deaths.

## Discussion

This series includes only pediatric patients with ruptured appendices who underwent open appendectomy immediately after resuscitation. Although laparoscopic removal of the ruptured appendix has become increasingly common in children, this was not done at SickKids until 1994. Moreover, there are still open appendectomies being done in both adult and pediatric populations throughout the world.5–8

Since the 1950s, reports of the incidence of wound infection and postoperative intra-abdominal abscess after open appendectomy in children with a ruptured appendix have ranged from 0% to 84% (Tables 4 and 5).5,9–12,14–35 Most authors have reported rates of about 5% for wound infection and 10% for postoperative intra-abdominal abscess.5,9–12,14–18,20–40 Although some reports (both adult and pediatric, often combined) indicate that some form of antibiotic prophylaxis will diminish the incidence of both complications,35,37–50 others claim it makes no difference.5,23,24,27–33,36,51–54

View this table:
[Table 4](http://canjsurg.ca/content/56/3/E7/T4)

Table 4 
Pediatric ruptured appendicitis papers reporting on peritoneal drain with postoperative wound infections and intra-abdominal abscess results

View this table:
[Table 5](http://canjsurg.ca/content/56/3/E7/T5)

Table 5 
Pediatric ruptured appendicitis papers reporting no peritoneal drain with postoperative wound infections and intra-abdominal abscess results

In our series, each ruptured appendix at operation had an obvious perforation confirmed by histopathological examination. The amount of peritoneal contamination varied between a small localized area in the right lower quadrant (15%) and gross contamination throughout the peritoneal cavity (85%). However, it was difficult correlating the preoperative presentation, intraoperative contamination and postoperative course. Patients with a gangrenous appendix with no obvious perforation were not included in this study. We are aware of only 2 pediatric studies13,35 that distinguished between localized and diffuse perforations, but only 1 of these studies excluded patients with gangrenous appendicitis unless there was also a perforation.13 There was a significant improvement in both the wound infection and postoperative intra-abdominal abscess rates when patients with unruptured gangrenous appendicitis were included in the study.35

The 3 types of prophylaxis for wound infection and postoperative intra-abdominal abscess after open appendectomy in children with ruptured appendicitis have all been tried at SickKids since the 1960s (Table 1). In the 1960s and 1970s, antibiotics were not routinely used at SickKids, and the rationale for this was supported by the literature,5,20–29,55–63 including a 1974 study54 conducted at SickKids that reported a wound infection rate of 19% and a postoperative intra-abdominal abscess rate of 14%, which were the norm of the time. However, in 1982, David and colleagues35 reported the results of a 5-year retrospective review involving 270 patients at SickKids with ruptured appendicitis; the authors found a wound infection rate of 6% and a postoperative intra-abdominal abscess rate of 5%. They concluded that using triple IV antibiotics (ampicillin, clindamycin or metronidazole, gentamycin) and not using a peritoneal wound drain decreased the incidence of both wound infection and postoperative intra-abdominal abscess; this finding was also supported by their review of the literature at that time.5,31,64,65 The authors also focused on the specific antibiotic treatment of anaerobic bacteria, especially *Bacteroides fragilis*.27,32,40,66,67 However, the drawback of their paper was that patients with unruptured gangrenous appendicitis were also included in their study of ruptured appendicitis, and including those patients improved their results.

In 1969, 2 parallel studies were conducted at SickKids to examine

1.  prophylaxis for wound infection after open appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis, and

2.  prophylaxis for wound infection and postoperative intra-abdominal abscess after open appendectomy in patients with ruptured appendicitis.

After 25 years (in 1995), the results of the first study were published,3 reporting that prophylactic SC cefoxitin powder and preoperative IV antibiotics was significantly better (wound infection rate 2.5%, *p* = 0.003) than the other treatment groups in the study. The results from the second study were tabulated and evaluated in January 2004 and are presented here. We found that patients who received a peritoneal wound drain had the lowest wound infection rate (7%; Table 2) and that patients treated with SC antibiotic powder and IV antibiotics had the lowest postoperative intra-abdominal abscess rate (6%; Table 2). Although 2 previous studies9,11 concluded that immediate appendectomy, antibiotic irrigations of the peritoneal cavity, transperitoneal drainage through the wound and 10-day treatment with intravenous ampicillin, clindamycin and gentamycin was the “gold standard” for treatment of perforated appendicitis, peritoneal drainage for the treatment of ruptured appendicitis in infants and children has become less popular over the last 20 years despite reported wound infection and postoperative intra-abdominal abscess rates ranging from 0% to 12% (Table 4). During the same period, the results of similar series that did not use peritoneal drain indicated wound infection rates ranging from 0% to 16% and postoperative intra-abdominal abscess rates ranging from 1.1% to 8% (Table 5).

## Conclusion

The best results from our clinical review show no major variations from these other large series.

## Footnotes

*   **Competing interests:** None declared.

*   **Contributors:** S.H. Ein and A. Nasr designed the study and analyzed the data. S.H. Ein and A. Ein acquired the data. S.H. Ein wrote the article. All authors reviewed the article and approved its publication.

*   Accepted June 7, 2012.

## References

1.  Shackelford RTSurgery of the alimentary tract1st edPhiladelphia (OA)Saunders19552564–5.
    
    

2.  Watters DAK, Walker MA, Abernethy BC.The appendix stump: Should it be invaginated?.Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1984;66:92–3.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=6703637&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

3.  Ein SH, Sandler A.Wound infection prophylaxis in pediatric acute appendicitis: a 26-year prospective study.J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:538–41.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.11.052&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16516631&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

4.  Ein SH, Wales P, Langer JC, et al.Is there a role for routine abdominal imaging in predicting postoperative intraabdominal abscess formation after appendectomy for ruptured appendix?.Pediatr Surg Int 2008;24:307–9.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18188573&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

5.  Brumer M.Appendicitis. Seasonal incidence and postoperative wound infection.Br J Surg 1970;57:93–9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/bjs.1800570204&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=5416608&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1970F717400003&link_type=ISI) 

6.  Cariati A, Brignole E, Tonelli E, et al.Laparoscopic or open appendectomy: critical review of literature and personal experience.G Chir 2001;22:353–7.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11816948&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

7.  Buckley RC, Hall HT, Muakkassa FF, et al.Laparoscopic appendectomy: Is it worth it?.Am Surg 1994;60:30–4.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8273971&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1994MP52200006&link_type=ISI) 

8.  Yeh CC, Wu SC, Liao CC, et al.Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is more favorable for patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and those with complicated appendicitis: a nationwide population-based study.Surg Endosc 2011;25:2932–42.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00464-011-1645-x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21424194&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

9.  Schwartz MZ, Tapper D, Solenberger RI.Management of perforated appendicitis in children.Ann Surg 1983;197:407–11.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=6830346&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1983QH84700005&link_type=ISI) 

10. Curran TJ, Meunchow SK.The treatment of complicated appendicitis in children using peritoneal drainage: results from a public hospital.J Pediatr Surg 1993;28:204–8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0022-3468(05)80276-3&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8437082&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1993KM70700022&link_type=ISI) 

11. Lund DP, Murphy EU.Management of perforated appendicitis in children: a decade of aggressive treatment.J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:1130–3.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0022-3468(94)90294-1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7965520&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1994PB51600037&link_type=ISI) 

12. Oka T, Kurkchubasche AG, Bussey JG, et al.Open and laparoscopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children.Surg Endosc 2004;18:242–5.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00464-003-8140-y&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=14691709&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000222826400013&link_type=ISI) 

13. Narci A, Karaman I, Karaman A, et al.Is peritoneal drainage necessary in childhood perforated appendicitis? A comparative study.J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:1864–8.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18022437&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

14. Karp MP, Caldarola VA, Cooney DR, et al.The avoidable excesses in the management of perforated appendicitis in children.J Pediatr Surg 1986;21:506–10.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3723302&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1986C648300007&link_type=ISI) 

15. Samelson SL, Reyes HM.Management of perforated appendicitis in children revisited.Arch Surg 1987;122:691–6.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400180073014&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3579584&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1987H528300014&link_type=ISI) 

16. Elmore JR, Dibbins AW, Curci MR.The treatment of complicated appendicitis in children: What is the gold standard?.Arch Surg 1987;122:424–7.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400160050006&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3566525&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1987G737000006&link_type=ISI) 

17. Neilson IR, Laberge JM, Nguyen LT, et al.Appendicitis in children: current therapeutic recommendation.J Pediatr Surg 1990;25:1113–6.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0022-3468(90)90742-R&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=2273422&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1990EH58400002&link_type=ISI) 

18. Emil S, Laberge JM, Mikhail P, et al.Appendicitis in children: a ten-year update of therapeutic recommendations.J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:236–42.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1053/jpsu.2003.50052&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12596112&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000180811700020&link_type=ISI) 

19. Foster JH, Edwards WH.Acute appendicitis in infancy and childhood: a twenty year study in a general hospital.Ann Surg 1957;146:70–7.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=13435703&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

20. Longino LA, Holder TM, Gross RE.Appendicitis in childhood. A study of 1,358 cases.Pediatrics 1958;22:238–46.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTA6InBlZGlhdHJpY3MiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiMjIvMi8yMzgiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoxNzoiL2Nqcy81Ni8zL0U3LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

21. Boles ET, Ireton RJ, Clatworthy HW Jr..Acute appendicitis in children.Arch Surg 1959;79:447–51.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archsurg.1959.04320090095014&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1959WJ90700014&link_type=ISI) 

22. Fock G, Gästrin U, Josephson S.Appendiceal peritonitis in children. A ten-year case material.Acta Chir Scand 1969;135:534–8.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=5368944&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

23. Holgersen LO, Stanley-Brown EG.Acute appendicitis with perforation.Am J Dis Child 1971;122:288–93.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archpedi.1971.02110040072004&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=5000497&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

24. Stone HH, Sanders SL, Martin JD Jr..Perforated appendicitis in children.Surgery 1971;69:673–9.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=5575493&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1971J213000004&link_type=ISI) 

25. Haller JA Jr., Shaker IH, Donahoo JS, et al.Peritoneal drainage versus non-drainage for generalized peritonitis from ruptured appendicitis in children: a prospective study.Ann Surg 1973;177:595–600.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=4704043&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1973P655700014&link_type=ISI) 

26. Othersen HB, Campbell TW.Programmed treatment of ruptured appendicitis in children.South Med J 1974;67:903–7.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=4853895&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

27. Leigh DA, Simmons K, Norman E.Bacterial flora of the appendix fossa in appendicitis and postoperative wound infection.J Clin Pathol 1974;27:997–1000.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToiamNsaW5wYXRoIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjI3LzEyLzk5NyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjE3OiIvY2pzLzU2LzMvRTcuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

28. Bates T, Down RHL, Houghton MCV, et al.Topical ampicillin in the prevention of wound infection after appendicectomy.Br J Surg 1974;61:489–92.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=4601029&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

29. Douglas B, Vesey B.Bacteroides: A cause of residual abscess?.J Pediatr Surg 1975;10:215–20.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=1123703&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

30. Everson NW, Fossard DP, Nash JR, et al.Wound infection following appendicectomy: the effect of extraperitoneal wound drainage and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis.Br J Surg 1977;64:236–8.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=322787&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

31. Greenall MJ, Evans M, Pollock AV.Should you drain a perforated appendix?.Br J Surg 1978;65:880–2.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=737427&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

32. Donovan IA, Ellis D, Gatehouse D, et al.One-dose antibiotic prophylaxis against wound infection after appendicectomy: a randomized trial of clindamycin, cefazolin sodium and a placebo.Br J Surg 1979;66:193–6.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/bjs.1800660317&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=371743&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1979GM29000016&link_type=ISI) 

33. Bates T, Touquet VLR, Tutton MK, et al.Prophylactic metronidazole in appendicectomy: a controlled trial.Br J Surg 1980;67:547–50.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7000227&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

34. Graham JM, Pokorny WJ, Harberg FJ.Acute appendicitis in preschool age children.Am J Surg 1980;139:247–50.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0002-9610(80)90265-2&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7356110&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1980JG49700019&link_type=ISI) 

35. David IB, Buck JR, Filler RM.Rational use of antibiotics for perforated appendicitis in childhood.J Pediatr Surg 1982;17:494–500.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0022-3468(82)80096-1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7175634&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1982PN33600009&link_type=ISI) 

36. Foster JH, Edwards WH.Acute appendicitis in infancy and childhood: a twenty year study in a general hospital.Ann Surg 1957;146:70–7.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=13435703&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

37. Gutiérrez C, Vila J, Garcia-Sala C, et al.Study of appendicitis in children treated with four different antibiotic regimens.J Pediatr Surg 1987;22:865–8.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3312564&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

38. Helmer KS, Robinson EK, Lally KP, et al.Standardized patient care guidelines reduce infectious morbidity in appendectomy patients.Am J Surg 2002;183:608–13.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00860-7&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12095586&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

39. Busuttil RW, Davidson RK, Fine M, et al.Effect of prophylactic antibiotics in acute nonperforated appendicitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study.Ann Surg 1981;194:502–9.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7025769&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

40. Fine M, Busuttil RW.Acute appendicitis: efficacy of prophylactic pre-operative antibiotics in the reduction of septic morbidity.Am J Surg 1978;135:210–2.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=564612&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

41. Stringel G.Appendicitis in children: a systematic approach for a low incidence of complications.Am J Surg 1987;154:631–5.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0002-9610(87)90231-5&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3425808&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1987L385100015&link_type=ISI) 

42. Pettigrew RA.Delayed primary wound closure in gangrenous and perforated appendicitis.Br J Surg 1981;68:635–8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/bjs.1800680910&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7023599&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1981MJ25400009&link_type=ISI) 

43. Berman EJ, Shie MD, Rowe GA.Gangrenous appendicitis in children: a different approach.Am Surg 1980;46:582–8.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7425433&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

44. Tanphiphat C, Sangsubhan C, Vongvaravipatr V, et al.Wound infection in emergency appendicectomy: a prospective trial with topical ampicillin and antiseptic solution irrigation.Br J Surg 1978;65:89–91.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=342043&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

45. Pollock AV, Leaper DJ, Evans M.Simple dose intra-incisional antibiotic prophylaxis of surgical wound sepsis: a controlled trial of cephaloridine and ampicillin.Br J Surg 1977;64:322–5.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=324556&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

46. Stoker TAM, Ellis H.Wound antibiotics in gastro-intestinal surgery: comparison of ampicillin with penicillin and sulphadiazine.Br J Surg 1972;59:184–6.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=4622562&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

47. Gilmore OJA, Martin TDM.Aetiology and prevention of wound infection in appendectomy.Br J Surg 1974;61:281–7.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/bjs.1800610407&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=4364995&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1974S943700006&link_type=ISI) 

48. 1.  Pickering LK
    
    American Academy of PediatricsAntimicrobial prophylaxisPickering LKRed Book: 2003 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases26th edElk Grove Village (IL)American Academy of Pediatrics2003773–81.
    
    

49. Wilson RG, Taylor EW, Lindsay G, et al.A comparative study of cefotetan and metronidazole against metronidazole alone to prevent infection after appendectomy.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987;164:447–51.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3554565&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

50. Andersen BR, Kallehave FL, Andersen HK.Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicectomy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20032CD001439
    
    

51. McGreal GT, Joy A, Manning B, et al.Antiseptic wick: Does it reduce the incidence of wound infection following appendectomy?.World J Surg 2002;26:631–4.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12098059&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

52. Górecki WJ, Grochowski JA.Are antibiotics necessary in non-perforated appendicitis in children? A double blind randomized controlled trial.Med Sci Monit 2001;7:289–92.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11257737&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

53. Kizilcan F, Tanyel FC, Büyükpamukcu N, et al.The necessity of prophylactic antibiotics in uncomplicated appendicitis during childhood.J Pediatr Surg 1992;27:586–8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0022-3468(92)90453-E&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=1625127&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

54. Shandling B, Ein SH, Simpson JS, et al.Perforating appendicitis and antibiotics.J Pediatr Surg 1974;9:79–83.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0022-3468(74)90012-8&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=4811256&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1974S199900011&link_type=ISI) 

55. Lansden FT.Acute appendicitis in children.Am J Surg 1963;106:938–42.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0002-9610(63)90160-0&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=14099472&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1963WJ50300012&link_type=ISI) 

56. McLauthlin CH, Packard GB.Acute appendicitis in children.Am J Surg 1961;101:619–25.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0002-9610(61)90272-0&link_type=DOI) 

57. Kazarian KK, Roeder WJ, Mersheimer WL.Decreasing mortality and increasing morbidity from acute appendicitis.Am J Surg 1970;119:681–5.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0002-9610(70)90239-4&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=5445991&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1970G549000013&link_type=ISI) 

58. Babcock JR, McKinley WM.Acute appendicitis: an analysis of 1,662 consecutive cases.Ann Surg 1959;150:131–41.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=13661840&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

59. Moloney GE, Russell WT, Wilson DC.Appendicitis: a report on its social pathology and recent surgical experience.Br J Surg 1950;38:52–64.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/bjs.18003814911&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15434318&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

60. Fowler R.Childhood mortality from acute appendicitis. The impact of antibiotics.Med J Aust 1971;2:1009–14.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=5131537&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

61. Gilmour IEW, Lowdon AGR.Acute appendicitis.Edinb Med J 1952;59:361–73.
    
    

62. Cantrell JR, Stafford ES.The diminishing mortality from appendicitis.Ann Surg 1955;141:749–58.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=14377318&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1955WF45000001&link_type=ISI) 

63. Deaver JM.Acute appendicitis in children.Ann Surg 1952;136:243–9.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=14953148&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1952UE73700007&link_type=ISI) 

64. Magarey CJ, Chant ADB, Rickford CRK, et al.Peritoneal drainage and systemic antibiotics after appendicectomy: a prospective trial.Lancet 1971;2:179–82.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=4104846&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1971J861400002&link_type=ISI) 

65. Janik JS, Firor HV.Pediatric appendicitis: a 20-year study of 1,640 children at Cook County (Illinois) Hospital.Arch Surg 1979;114:717–9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370300071011&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=313200&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1979GY56200011&link_type=ISI) 

66. Brook I.Bacterial studies of peritoneal cavity and postoperative surgical wound drainage following perforated appendix in children.Ann Surg 1980;192:208–12.
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7406576&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1980KE59400014&link_type=ISI) 

67. Morris WT, Innes DB, Richardson RA, et al.The prevention of post-appendicectomy sepsis by Metronidazole and Cefazolin: A controlled double blind trial.Aust N Z J Surg 1980;50:429–33.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1445-2197.1980.tb04158.x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7000063&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 

68. Blakely ML, Williams R, Dassinger MS, et al.Early vs interval appendectomy for children with perforated appendicitis.Arch Surg 2011;146:660–5.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archsurg.2011.6&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21339413&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000291851500007&link_type=ISI) 

69. Pearl RH, Hale DA, Molloy M, et al.Pediatric appendectomy.J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:173–8discussion 178–81
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0022-3468(95)90556-1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7738734&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1995QG22400004&link_type=ISI) 

70. McCahill LE, Pellegrini CA, Wiggins T, et al.A clinical outcome and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.Am J Surg 1996;171:533–7.
    
    [CrossRef](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00022-0&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8651403&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fcjs%2F56%2F3%2FE7.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://canjsurg.ca/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1996UP24300023&link_type=ISI)