Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CJS
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CJS

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CJS on Twitter
Editorial

Access to surgery is not an election priority

Edward J. Harvey
CAN J SURG October 01, 2018 61 (5) 292; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.013618
Edward J. Harvey
Coeditor,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Access to surgery is not improving. Governments refer to physician wait lists as though we are responsible for them and, together with hospital administrations, have put the blame for delays on surgeons. I have had patients get angry at me about how long they have to wait for a consultation; yet, I have no control over the wait list. Although it can be difficult to generalize a national initiative to specific provinces, there seems to have been no improvement at the local level, at least from my perspective.

Despite two provincial elections this year in the populous centre of Canada, neither Quebec nor Ontario has planned for increased resources that aim to improve access to surgery. Their election platforms have not shown any hint that they will address the concerns of patients or those of surgeons.

The Quebec election has centred on the promise of more family doctors, which is a good goal but will not address surgical wait times. Quebec Liberal leader Philippe Couillard has pledged to increase the number of family doctors available to Quebecers — not with better management, but with a penalty for practising family physicians not increasing coverage. They will impose financial sanctions against doctors if the proportion of Quebecers with a family doctor doesn’t climb to 85% by the end of this year. Yet, they have no methodology or proposal on how to accomplish this. More dangerously, the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) party, who are leading in the polls for the October election, has discussed taking $2 billion in funding away from specialists. Such a measure has been tried before and resulted in worsening patient wait lists and in general unhappiness among physicians and patients.

Ontario and its new ruling party have no better plans to make surgery work for patients. Premier Doug Ford has vowed to “improve the system” while cutting 4% from every department’s budget. In health care, that would amount to a decrease in funding of $2.4 billion annually. That will not be an easy cut and will definitely affect patient care. The government would also like to encourage more doctors to move to northern Ontario by cutting their taxes, perhaps to zero. This may help — financial carrots sometimes work — and there is now a much more viable infrastructure for living in northern Ontario. However, there is no talk of adding surgical resources in any centre.

Looking at the plans of the two provinces in central Canada certainly leaves me with little hope for surgical patients waiting for years to see physicians and then months for surgery. This is not a physician issue; it is a systems issue. And the provincial governments unfortunately have no systems solutions. Under the proposed — or silently implied — health care conditions, there will be at least another half decade of surgical resource deficiencies in these provinces.

Footnotes

  • The views expressed in this editorial are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

  • Competing interests: E.J. Harvey is the Chief Medical Officer of Greybox Healthcare (Montreal) and Chairman of the Board of NXTSens Inc. (Montreal).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Journal of Surgery: 61 (5)
CAN J SURG
Vol. 61, Issue 5
1 Oct 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CJS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Access to surgery is not an election priority
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CJS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CJS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Access to surgery is not an election priority
Edward J. Harvey
CAN J SURG Oct 2018, 61 (5) 292; DOI: 10.1503/cjs.013618

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Access to surgery is not an election priority
Edward J. Harvey
CAN J SURG Oct 2018, 61 (5) 292; DOI: 10.1503/cjs.013618
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Submit a manuscript

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CJS represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

View CMA's Accessibility policy.

Powered by HighWire