Research
Open Access

What patient factors influence bariatric surgery outcomes? A multiple regression analysis of Ontario Bariatric Registry data

Uri Kaplan, Wael Zohdy, Scott Gmora, Dennis Hong and Mehran Anvari
Can J Surg February 03, 2022 65 (1) E66-E72; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.018319

Abstract

Background: As bariatric surgery evolves and gains popularity, statistical analysis of its outcomes could improve the process of decision-making and risk assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of age and other factors on bariatric surgery outcomes in order to improve patient selection and outcomes.

Methods: We analyzed data from the Ontario Bariatric Registry to evaluate the influence of age and 10 other factors on early (< 90 d) and 1-year surgical outcomes among patients aged 18 years or older who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) between January 2010 and May 2013. Early outcomes included composite adverse events and readmission. The 1-year outcomes included percent excess body weight loss (%EBWL), and remission of diabetes mellitus and hypertension. We performed multiple regression analysis to identify independent variables that influenced these outcomes.

Results: We identified 3166 patients (2655 women [83.9%] and 511 men [16.1%], mean age 44.8 yr, mean body mass index [BMI] 48.4) who underwent LRYGB (2839 [89.7%]) or LSG (327 [10.3%]) over the study period and completed their 1-year follow-up. Preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and history of angina were independent variables that influenced the composite adverse event outcome. Obstructive sleep apnea was the only factor that influenced early readmission. The independent factors that influenced %EBWL were age, type of surgery, BMI and baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level: age was found to influence hypertension remission, and HbA1c level and obstructive sleep apnea were found to influence diabetes remission.

Conclusion: Complications after bariatric surgery can be predicted by preoperative ASA score and history of angina; patient age was not related to an increase in postoperative complications. These factors could help both surgeon and patient make appropriate surgical decisions.

The prevalence of obesity has been increasing for the last 30 years, and obesity has been recognized as an epidemic by the World Health Organization.1 The prevalence of adult obesity in Canada is 20%.2 Currently, bariatric surgery is the most successful and most effective treatment for severe obesity in terms of weight loss, remission of comorbidities and improved quality of life.3

Bariatric surgery can be performed with low peri- and postoperative risk, including a 30-day mortality rate of 0.3%.4 Laparoscopy contributed substantially to the reduction in complications after bariatric surgery.5 A decade ago, older age was considered a relative contraindication to bariatric surgery.6 Advances in laparoscopic surgery and patient preoperative assessment have also contributed to decreased rates of postoperative complications and mortality.

To determine the factors that influence the infrequent peri- and postoperative adverse outcomes, a large standardized database of bariatric surgery outcomes is essential. The Ontario Bariatric Registry collects prospective data for all participating patients undergoing bariatric surgery in 11 bariatric centres across the province. Identifying independent factors that influence adverse events and bariatric surgical outcomes can lead to better patient selection and care, and better outcomes.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative influence of age and other factors on bariatric surgery outcomes in order to improve patient selection and outcomes.

Methods

Design and setting

The Ontario Bariatric Network maintains a prospective data registry, the Ontario Bariatric Registry, to record the pre-and postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing bariatric surgery at 10 Bariatric Centres of Excellence and 1 Regional Assessment and Treatment Centre in the province. Preoperative, operative and postoperative data are collected through chart review and patient questionnaire. The database registry is approved by the ethics committee at each participating centre, and all patients provide informed consent.

In Ontario, patients are referred through a centralized referral portal and assigned to a Bariatric Centre of Excellence or Regional Assessment and Treatment Centre based on their postal code. Currently, the 2 most common bariatric procedures performed are laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). In this retrospective study, we chose to include only patients who underwent 1 of these 2 operations.

Study population

This study included all registry patients aged 18 years or older who underwent LRYGB or LSG between January 2010 and May 2013.

Covariables

We selected the following independent variables, based on a review of the current literature: age, type of surgery, body mass index (BMI), gender, ethnicity, obstructive sleep apnea, previous myocardial infarction or angina, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level and preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score.

Outcomes

We defined two early outcomes (occurring within 90 d of surgery) and three 1-year outcomes. The first early outcome was a composite outcome based on the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery study.4 It included any of the following outcomes: deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, failure to discharge within 30 days, anastomotic or staple line leak, bleeding necessitating transfusion, reintervention, pulmonary complication (including pneumonia and respiratory failure, but not atelectasis), cardiac complication (including myocardial infarction, angina, heart failure or cardiac arrest), stroke and death. The second early outcome was readmission to hospital within 90 days of surgery.

The 1-year outcomes were 1) mean percent excess body weight loss (%EBWL), which is widely used in the bariatric programs as an assessment tool; 2) remission of diabetes (defined as an HbA1c level < 6.5% without antidiabetic medication); and 3) remission of hypertension (defined as systolic pressure < 140 mm Hg and diastolic pressure < 90 mm Hg without blood-pressure–lowering medication).

Statistical analysis

We calculated unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) for all independent variables. Associations were considered significant with a p < 0.05. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to identify independent variables that control the main outcome measures. We conducted the Durbin–Watson test to ensure independence of errors (residuals). We examined tolerance values and correlation coefficients to be fairly confident that we did not have an issue with collinearity in our data set. The assumptions of linearity, independence of errors, homoskedasticity, unusual points and normality of residuals were met before we interpreted the results. We performed analysis of variance to determine whether the regression model was a good fit for the data. We analyzed the data using SPSS Version 21.0 (IBM Corp.).

Results

We identified 3166 patients (2655 women [83.9%] and 511 men [16.1%] with a mean age of 44.8 yr [standard deviation (SD) 10.3 yr]) who underwent LRYGB or LSG between January 2010 and May 2013 and completed their 12-month follow-up (Table 1). Most patients (2839 [89.7%]) underwent LRYGB. The mean BMI was 48.4 (SD 8.6). The rates of comorbidities of interest before surgery and 6 and 12 months after surgery are presented in Figure 1, and rates before and 12 months after surgery by procedure type are shown in Table 2. Remission of comorbidities at 1 year was significant except for obstructive sleep apnea after LSG.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Prevalence of comorbidities before surgery and 6 months and 1 year after surgery. GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease.

View this table:
Table 1

Characteristics of patients who underwent LRYGB or LSG

View this table:
Table 2

Prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and obstructive sleep apnea before and 1 year after surgery, by procedure type

The rate of intraoperative complications was 2.6%. Most of the complications (56/82 [68%]) were minor; there were no intraoperative deaths.

Early outcomes

Of the 3166 patients, 202 (6.4%) were readmitted to hospital within 90 days. We excluded 250 patients from the composite outcome analysis because of missing data. Of the 2916 remaining patients, 34 (1.2%) had sleeve or anastomosis stenosis, 18 (0.6%) had an anastomotic leak, 12 (0.4%) had pulmonary complications, 4 (0.1%) had pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis, 2 (0.1%) had cardiac complications (myocardial infarction in 1 and angina pectoris in 1), and 2 (0.1%) were not discharged within 30 days, for a composite outcome of adverse events rate of 2.4%. There were no occurrences of death or stroke.

Multiple regression analysis of the independent variables showed that previous angina and ASA score were significantly associated with the occurrence of adverse postoperative events (Table 3).

View this table:
Table 3

Predictors of adverse postoperative events on multiple regression analysis

Multiple regression analysis showed that diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea preoperatively was significantly associated with readmission (Table 4). Age and type of surgery, however, were not predictive of any early outcomes.

View this table:
Table 4

Predictors of readmission on multiple regression analysis

One-year outcomes

The average 1-year %EBWL was 60.43 kg/m2 (SD 16.3 kg/m2). The rates of diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease and obstructive sleep apnea were 12.1% (199/1639), 21.7% (356/1639), 10.5% (172/1639), 17.0% (278/1638) and 38.2% (626/1638), respectively.

The independent variables found on multiple regression analysis to have a strong effect on %EBWL were age, type of surgery, initial BMI and preoperative HbA1c level. Younger patients had higher %EBWL than older patients. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was found to be more effective than LSG in achieving weight loss. Patients with lower BMI had higher %EBWL than those with higher BMI. Lower preoperative HbA1c level was predictive of higher weight loss after bariatric surgery (Table 5). Lower preoperative HbA1c level (OR 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05 to 1.49) and diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.236 to 0.99) were strong predictors of diabetes remission. Age and surgery type influenced hypertension remission in the same way they influenced %EBWL, with younger patients having a greater decrease in blood pressure values than older patients (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.11), and patients who underwent LRYGB showing greater weight loss than those who underwent LSG (OR 0.385, 95% CI 0.186 to 0.790).

View this table:
Table 5

Factors predicting percent excess body weight loss 12 months after surgery

Discussion

In this study, the rate of adverse events in patients undergoing bariatric surgery was low. We used a composite outcome4 to perform a better analysis and found that 2.4% of patients experienced a composite outcome adverse event, which is comparable to rates reported in other studies.4,7–9 We separated readmission from the composite outcome because of the difficulty in defining the cause for readmission. We found that a previous history of angina and high ASA score were independent factors that negatively influenced the occurrence of adverse events after bariatric surgery. Wolter and colleagues10 also found that ASA score was a predictor of postoperative outcome.

The ASA score has been shown to have high variability, even within the same institution.11,12 Although the ASA score is used worldwide, this limitation highlights the need to consider standardization and use of more objective measurements. However, the significant correlation between ASA score and the composite outcome in the present study justifies its use until a more accurate assessment tool is developed. Finks and colleagues13 showed a relation between coronary artery disease and increased complications after bariatric surgery. We found a significant correlation between the two, which may highlight the importance of cardiac assessment before bariatric surgery.

There is great variability in the causes for readmission after bariatric surgery. The 90-day readmission rate in our study was 6.4%, comparable to that in other published studies, with reported 30-day readmission rates of up to 15%.14,15 Nausea or vomiting causing fluid, electrolyte or nutrient deficiency was identified by Berger and colleagues16 as the main cause for readmission (35.4%). Unlike Sun and colleagues,17 who found multiple factors related to readmission (including initial BMI, higher ASA score and history of cardiac disease), we found that only a prior history of obstructive sleep apnea was associated with readmission. The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery study showed that obstructive sleep apnea was related to increased risk of adverse events after bariatric surgery.4 Although we did not find this relation, the fact that obstructive sleep apnea was related to perioperative adverse events could be inferred from the observed association with readmission. Dorman and colleagues18 reported that patients with obstructive sleep apnea had significantly higher odds of being readmitted within 30 days compared to those without obstructive sleep apnea (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.9). This observation was limited to patients who underwent adjustable gastric banding and was not found in those who had LRYGB. Further study is needed on this subject.

Prognostic factors that influence %EBWL after bariatric surgery have been reviewed.19,20 Our results support those of the SLEEVEPASS study, in which 240 patients with severe obesity were followed.21 The investigators concluded that patients who had undergone LRYGB had greater %EBWL than those who had undergone LSG, but the difference was not statistically significant. In a Swiss multicentre randomized trial of 217 obese patients, there was no significant difference in weight loss at 1, 2 or 5 years between the LRYGB and LSG groups.22 The negative correlation of age, initial BMI and preoperative HbA1c level on %EBWL is well established.20,23,24 At our institute, LSG is offered to patients with higher initial BMI or a history of multiple abdominal surgical procedures, and on patient request. The higher initial BMI may explain the negative correlation between initial BMI and %EBWL in this group.

Bariatric surgery is superior to conventional medical therapy for the treatment and remission of diabetes mellitus in obese patients.25 In our study, diabetes remission was defined as an HbA1c level less than 6.5% and no use of antidiabetic medications. The severity of disease, which correlates to higher HbA1c level and use of several medications for glycemic control, has been reported to have a negative influence on the chances of remission after bariatric surgery.26 Similarly, we found that a low HbA1c level preoperatively may predict remission of diabetes 1 year after bariatric surgery, which is in agreement with current literature.27

We found a direct negative relation between obstructive sleep apnea and diabetes remission after bariatric surgery. This association is well established.28 Decreased insulin sensitivity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea seems to be the factor in this association.29

Remission of hypertension after bariatric surgery has been less well studied than diabetes remission after bariatric surgery. We defined hypertension remission as a systolic blood pressure less than 140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg with the patient not taking any antihypertensive medications and found that patients who had LRYGB were more likely than those who underwent LSG to be cured of hypertension. Flores and colleagues30 reported that patients with a long (≥ 10 yr) history of hypertension or taking multiple antihypertensive medications (≥ 3) were less likely to be cured than patients receiving fewer than 3 medications. Zhang and colleagues31 reported no difference in blood pressure reduction between procedures (LRYGB v. LSG) at postoperative day 30 (23.5% v. 22.5%), 6 months (40% v. 39.2%) or 1 year (52.9% v. 38.8%). Although the difference in the remission rate was higher in the LRYGB group, the difference was not statistically significant. Studies describing health benefits of gastric bypass have shown hypertension remission or blood pressure reduction of 50%–60% at 2 years across all surgical procedures.32,33 We believe that if the duration of outcome assessment had been extended in the studies that showed higher but statistically nonsignificant hypertension remission rates, the impact of type of surgery would have been apparent.

The correlation between age and bariatric surgery outcomes is unclear. Although increased age was once a relative contraindication for bariatric surgery and was shown to be a prognostic factor for complications,34 recent literature shows that bariatric surgery is effective and safe in older patients.23,35 We did not find any correlation between age and adverse events or readmission after bariatric surgery. The effect of age on remission of obesity-related comorbidities is not well defined. In the present study, age was a significant factor in hypertension remission but not diabetes remission.

Limitations

The duration of follow-up for this study was only 1 year. Preoperative disease definition and the clinical decision to start, change or stop the use of medication was not standardized. Despite these limitations, this study showed comparable results to those of other studies in regard to preoperative comorbidity prevalence, %EBWL and remission of obesity-related comorbidities. Follow-up was based on patient questionnaire, which may be subject to information bias or misclassification.36

Conclusion

Using a large standardized database, we identified prognostic factors that influence outcomes and complications after bariatric surgery. Higher ASA score (although not well standardized) and a history of angina were independently related to postoperative complications. Age seemed to be a less significant factor in risk assessment and outcomes. Knowledge of factors predictive of outcomes and complications after bariatric surgery should help both the surgeon and the patient to make the appropriate decision regarding surgery.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Contributors: U. Kaplan and M. Anvari designed the study. S. Gmora and M. Anvari acquired the data, which W. Zohdy, D. Hong and M. Anvari analyzed. U. Kaplan and W. Zohdy wrote the manuscript, which S. Gmora, D. Hong and M. Anvari critically revised. All authors gave final approval of the article to be published.

  • Accepted March 3, 2021.

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

References

  1. ↵
    Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000;894:i-xii, 1–253.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Aguilar M,
    2. Bhuket T,
    3. Torres S,
    4. et al
    . Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the United States. JAMA 2015;313:1973–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Dorman RB,
    2. Abraham AA,
    3. Al-Refaie WB,
    4. et al
    . Bariatric surgery outcomes in the elderly: an ACS NSQIP study. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:35–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) Consortium; Flum DR, Belle SH, King WC, et al. Peri-operative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:445–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Tian HL,
    2. Tian JH,
    3. Yang KH,
    4. et al
    . The effects of laparoscopic vs. open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev 2011;12: 254–60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Valera JE,
    2. Wilson SENN
    . Outcomes of bariatric surgery in the elderly. Am Surg 2006;72:865–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Aminian A,
    2. Brethauer SA,
    3. Sharafkhah M,
    4. et al
    . Development of a sleeve gastrectomy risk calculator. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2015;11: 758–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Daigle CR,
    2. Brethauer SA,
    3. Tu C,
    4. et al
    . Which postoperative complications matter most after bariatric surgery? Prioritizing quality improvement efforts to improve national outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2018;14:652–7.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Fridman A,
    2. Moon R,
    3. Cozacov Y,
    4. et al
    . Procedure-related morbidity in bariatric surgery: a retrospective short- and mid-term follow-up of a single institution of the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence. J Am Coll Surg 2013;217: 614–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Wolters U,
    2. Wolf T,
    3. Stutzer HST
    . ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 1996;77:217–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Mak PH,
    2. Campbell RC,
    3. Irwin MG
    . The ASA Physical Status Classification: inter-observer consistency. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002;30: 633–40.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Haynes SR,
    2. Lawler PGP
    . An assessment of the consistency of ASA Physical Status Classification allocation. Anaesthesia 1995;50:195–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Finks JF,
    2. Kole KL,
    3. Yenumula PR,
    4. et al.
    Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, from the Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy. Predicting risk for serious complications with bariatric surgery: results from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. Ann Surg 2011;254:633–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Garg T,
    2. Rosas U,
    3. Rogan D,
    4. et al
    . Characterizing readmissions after bariatric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2016;20:1797–801.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Major P,
    2. Wysocki M,
    3. Torbicz G,
    4. et al
    . Risk factors for prolonged length of hospital stay and readmissions after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2018; 28:323–32.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Berger ER,
    2. Huffman KM,
    3. Fraker T,
    4. et al
    . Prevalence and risk factors for bariatric surgery readmissions: findings from 130,007 admissions in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 2018;267:122–31.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Sun SX,
    2. Hollenbeak CS,
    3. Rogers AM
    . Readmissions following gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg 2016;26:269–75.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Dorman RB,
    2. Miller CJ,
    3. Leslie DB,
    4. et al
    . Risk for hospital readmission following bariatric surgery. PLoS One 2012;7:e32506.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Ortega E,
    2. Morínigo R,
    3. Flores L,
    4. et al
    . Predictive factors of excess body weight loss 1 year after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 2012;26:1744–50.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Still CD,
    2. Wood GC,
    3. Chu X,
    4. et al
    . Clinical factors associated with weight loss outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014;22:888–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Salminen P,
    2. Helmiö M,
    3. Ovaska J,
    4. et al
    . Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018;319:241–54.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Peterli R,
    2. Borbély Y,
    3. Kern B,
    4. et al
    . Early results of the Swiss Multicentre Bypass or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS): a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg 2013;258:690–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Kaplan U,
    2. Penner S,
    3. Farrokhyar F,
    4. et al
    . Bariatric surgery in the elderly is associated with 320 similar surgical risks and significant long-term health benefits. Obes Surg 2018;28:2165–70.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Ochner CN,
    2. Jochner MC,
    3. Caruso EA,
    4. et al
    . Effect of preoperative body mass index on weight loss following obesity surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2013;9:423–7.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Mingrone G,
    2. Panunzi S,
    3. De Gaetano A,
    4. et al
    . Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1577–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Hatoum IJ,
    2. Blackstone R,
    3. Hunter TD,
    4. et al
    . Clinical factors associated with remission of obesity-related comorbidities after bariatric surgery. JAMA 2016;151:130–7.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Robert M,
    2. Ferrand-Gaillard C,
    3. Disse E,
    4. et al
    . Predictive factors of type 2 diabetes remission 1 year after bariatric surgery: impact of surgical techniques. Obes Surg 2013;23:770–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Nannapaneni S,
    2. Ramar K,
    3. Surani S
    . Effect of obstructive sleep apnea on type 2 diabetes mellitus: a comprehensive literature review. World J Diabetes 2013;4:238–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Song SO,
    2. He K,
    3. Narla RR,
    4. et al
    . Metabolic consequences of obstructive sleep apnea especially pertaining to diabetes mellitus and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Metab J 2019; 43:144–55.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Flores L,
    2. Vidal J,
    3. Canivell S,
    4. et al
    . Hypertension remission 1 year after bariatric surgery: predictive factors. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2014;10: 661–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Zhang N,
    2. Maffei A,
    3. Cerabona T,
    4. et al
    . Reduction in obesity-related comorbidities: Is gastric bypass better than sleeve gastrectomy? Surg Endosc 2013;27:1273–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Adams TD,
    2. Davidson LE,
    3. Litwin SE,
    4. et al
    . Health benefits of gastric bypass surgery after 6 years. JAMA 2012;308:1122–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Sjöström CD,
    2. Peltonen M,
    3. Wedel H,
    4. et al
    . Differentiated long-term effects of intentional weight loss on diabetes and hypertension. Hypertension 2000;36:20–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Scozzari G,
    2. Passera R,
    3. Benvenga R,
    4. et al
    . Age as a long-term prognostic factor in bariatric surgery. Ann Surg 2012;256:724–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Chow A,
    2. Switzer NJ,
    3. Gill RS,
    4. et al
    . Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the elderly: a systematic review. Obes Surg 2016;26:626–30.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Althubaiti A
    . Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. J Multidiscip Healthc 2016;9:211–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Journal of Surgery: 65 (1)
Can J Surg
Vol. 65, Issue 1
11 Jan 2022

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
What patient factors influence bariatric surgery outcomes? A multiple regression analysis of Ontario Bariatric Registry data
Uri Kaplan, Wael Zohdy, Scott Gmora, Dennis Hong, Mehran Anvari
Can J Surg Feb 2022, 65 (1) E66-E72; DOI: 10.1503/cjs.018319
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.

Similar Articles