Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CJS
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CJS

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CJS on Twitter
Research
Open Access

Patient opinions on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: A patient-driven discussion in need of tuning?

Zachary M. Brown, Angela E. Schellenberg, Erin Cordeiro, Claire M.B. Holloway, Adena S. Scheer and Andrea Eisen
CAN J SURG April 01, 2022 65 (2) E250-E256; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.003420
Zachary M. Brown
From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Brown); the Department of Surgery, Selkirk Regional Health Centre, Selkirk, Man. (Brown, Eisen); the Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. (Schellenberg); the Department of Surgical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont. (Cordeiro); the Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont. (Holloway); the Department of Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Scheer); and the CIBC Breast Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Scheer)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela E. Schellenberg
From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Brown); the Department of Surgery, Selkirk Regional Health Centre, Selkirk, Man. (Brown, Eisen); the Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. (Schellenberg); the Department of Surgical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont. (Cordeiro); the Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont. (Holloway); the Department of Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Scheer); and the CIBC Breast Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Scheer)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erin Cordeiro
From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Brown); the Department of Surgery, Selkirk Regional Health Centre, Selkirk, Man. (Brown, Eisen); the Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. (Schellenberg); the Department of Surgical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont. (Cordeiro); the Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont. (Holloway); the Department of Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Scheer); and the CIBC Breast Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Scheer)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claire M.B. Holloway
From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Brown); the Department of Surgery, Selkirk Regional Health Centre, Selkirk, Man. (Brown, Eisen); the Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. (Schellenberg); the Department of Surgical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont. (Cordeiro); the Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont. (Holloway); the Department of Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Scheer); and the CIBC Breast Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Scheer)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adena S. Scheer
From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Brown); the Department of Surgery, Selkirk Regional Health Centre, Selkirk, Man. (Brown, Eisen); the Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. (Schellenberg); the Department of Surgical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont. (Cordeiro); the Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont. (Holloway); the Department of Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Scheer); and the CIBC Breast Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Scheer)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea Eisen
From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Brown); the Department of Surgery, Selkirk Regional Health Centre, Selkirk, Man. (Brown, Eisen); the Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ont. (Schellenberg); the Department of Surgical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont. (Cordeiro); the Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont. (Holloway); the Department of Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Scheer); and the CIBC Breast Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Scheer)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants

    CharacteristicNo. (%) of participants
    n = 10
    Menopausal status
     Premenopausal6 (60)
     Postmenopausal4 (40)
    Relationship status
     Married8 (80)
     Single1 (10)
     Divorced1 (10)
    AJCC stage
     I4 (40)
     II2 (20)
     III4 (40)
    Surgery
     Unilateral mastectomy4 (40)
     Bilateral mastectomy6 (60)
    Reconstruction
     Immediate4 (40)
      Implant3 (30)
      Tissue transfer1 (10)
     Delayed (tissue transfer)1 (10)
     No reconstruction5 (50)
    Chemotherapy
     Yes8 (80)
      Adjuvant4 (50)
      Neoadjuvant4 (50)
     No2 (20)
    Trastuzumab therapy2 (20)
    Endocrine therapy5 (50)
    Radiotherapy5 (50)
    • AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Decisional parameters surrounding contraleral prophylactic mastectomy

    ItemNo. (%) of participants
    How participant felt when making decision about contraleral prophylactic mastectomy
    Unsure about what to do5 (50)
    Worried what could go wrong4 (40)
    Physical signs of stress4 (40)
    Questioning what is important3 (30)
    Distressed/upset2 (20)
    Wavering between choices/changing mind2 (20)
    Factors that made decision difficult
    Lacked information about options, benefits, risks4 (40)
    Lacked information on chances of benefits and harms2 (20)
    Felt unsupported2 (20)
    Felt pressure from others2 (20)
    Information overload1 (10)
    Unclear about what was important1 (10)
    Lacked motivation/not feeling ready to make decision1 (10)
    Lacked ability or skill to make decision1 (10)
    • View popup
    Table 3

    Participants’ knowledge and expectations regarding benefits and risk of contraleral prophylactic mastectomy

    ItemNo. (%) of participants
    Perceived benefit
    Reduced cancer risk9 (90)
    Improved psychologic well-being9 (90)
    Improved symmetry/cosmesis6 (60)
    No more follow-up (imaging, call-backs, procedures)4 (40)
    Improved longevity/survival3 (30)
    Reduced/no change in complication risk/recovery3 (30)
    Perceived risk
    Increased complication risk/recovery6 (60)
    Lack of survival advantage2 (20)
    • View popup
    Table 4

    Decisional support and resources

    ItemNo. (%) of participants*
    Methods
    Gathered information8 (80)
     From health care providers5 (50)
     From independent research4 (40)
    Information content
     Chances of benefits and risks7 (70)
     Options6 (60)
     How others go about deciding5 (50)
     Valuation/personal importance of benefits and risks4 (40)
    Beneficial resources
    Information materials8 (80)
     Health condition8 (80)
     Surgical options8 (80)
     Surgical benefits and risks8 (80)
     Probabilities of benefits and risks8 (80)
     Valuation/personal importance of benefits and risks4 (40)
     Guidance in deliberation3 (30)
    Counselling from health care practitioner7 (70)
    Discussion groups of people facing same decision5 (50)
    Format
    Booklet/pamphlet8 (80)
    Internet4 (40)
    Video3 (30)
    • ↵* Participants could choose more than 1 response.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Journal of Surgery: 65 (2)
CAN J SURG
Vol. 65, Issue 2
27 Apr 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CJS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patient opinions on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: A patient-driven discussion in need of tuning?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CJS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CJS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Patient opinions on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: A patient-driven discussion in need of tuning?
Zachary M. Brown, Angela E. Schellenberg, Erin Cordeiro, Claire M.B. Holloway, Adena S. Scheer, Andrea Eisen
CAN J SURG Apr 2022, 65 (2) E250-E256; DOI: 10.1503/cjs.003420

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Patient opinions on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: A patient-driven discussion in need of tuning?
Zachary M. Brown, Angela E. Schellenberg, Erin Cordeiro, Claire M.B. Holloway, Adena S. Scheer, Andrea Eisen
CAN J SURG Apr 2022, 65 (2) E250-E256; DOI: 10.1503/cjs.003420
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Submit a manuscript

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CJS represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

 

Powered by HighWire