PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Vanessa N. Palter
AU  - Sandra L. de Montbrun
TI  - Implementing new surgical technology: a national perspective on case volume requirement for proficiency in transanal total mesorectal excision
AID  - 10.1503/cjs.001119
DP  - 2020 Feb 01
TA  - Canadian Journal of Surgery
PG  - E21--E26
VI  - 63
IP  - 1
4099  - http://canjsurg.ca/content/63/1/E21.short
4100  - http://canjsurg.ca/content/63/1/E21.full
SO  - CAN J SURG2020 Feb 01; 63
AB  - Background: Early data suggest that transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a safe alternative to the abdominal approach for rectal cancer. This study aims to understand the approach to the management of rectal cancer in Canada and to ascertain perspectives on introducing TaTME.Methods: Surgeons were invited to complete a survey that asked about their management practices relating to rectal cancer and their opinions regarding TaTME.Results: Ninety-four surgeons completed the survey (38% response rate). The number of rectal cancer cases handled annually by surgeons varied widely (1–80 cases, median 15 cases). Twenty-seven percent of respondents performed TaTME at the time of the survey, and 43% of those who did not said they planned on learning the technique. Surgeons who performed TaTME felt that a higher annual volume of rectal cancer cases was required to maintain proficiency than did non-TaTME surgeons (median 20 cases [interquartile range (IQR) 15–25 cases] v. 15 cases [IQR 10–20 cases]). Surgeons who performed TaTME also felt that a higher annual volume of TaTME cases was required to maintain proficiency (median 12 cases [IQR 10–19 cases] v. 9 cases [IQR 5–10 cases]).Conclusion: These findings help define the current practice environment for rectal cancer surgeons in Canada and highlight the complex issues associated with learning TaTME.