TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of different liver resection methods on liver damage and regeneration factors VEGF and FGF-2 in mice JF - Canadian Journal of Surgery JO - CAN J SURG SP - 389 LP - 393 DO - 10.1503/cjs.007911 VL - 55 IS - 6 AU - Roderich Bönninghoff AU - Kay Schwenke AU - Michael Keese AU - Richard Magdeburg AU - Hinrich Bitter-Suermann AU - Mirko Otto AU - Till Hasenberg AU - Stefan Post AU - Jörg Sturm Y1 - 2012/12/01 UR - http://canjsurg.ca/content/55/6/389.abstract N2 - Background: Different approaches to study liver regeneration in murine models have been proposed. We investigated the effect of different liver resection models on liver damage and regeneration parameters in mice.Methods: We compared the technical aspect of the 2 most commonly used techniques of 50% and 70% liver resection. Liver damage, as determined by the change in serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, as well as the regeneration parameters VEGF and FGF-2 were analyzed at 6 time points. A postoperative vitality score was introduced.Results: Cholestasis was not observed for either technique. Both resection techniques resulted in full weight recovery of the liver after 240 hours, with no significant difference between sham and resection groups. Postoperative animal morbidity and total protein levels did not differ significantly for either method, indicating early and full functional recovery. However, comparing the mitogenic growth factors FGF-2 and VEGF, a significant increase in serum levels and, therefore, increased growth stimulus, was shown in the extended resection group.Conclusion: Extended resection led to a greater response in growth factor expression. This finding is important since it shows that growth factor response differs acdording to the extent of resection. We have demonstrated the need to standardize murine hepatic resection models to adequately compare the resulting liver damage. ER -