TY - JOUR T1 - Cost of open and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: surgeon perceptions versus the reality of hospital spending JF - Canadian Journal of Surgery JO - CAN J SURG SP - 392 LP - 397 DO - 10.1503/cjs.014817 VL - 61 IS - 6 AU - Liza Abraham AU - Nik Goyert AU - Daniel J. Kagedan AU - Andrea MacNeill AU - Michelle C. Cleghorn AU - Julie Hallet AU - Fayez A. Quereshy AU - Natalie G. Coburn Y1 - 2018/12/01 UR - http://canjsurg.ca/content/61/6/392.abstract N2 - Background: Rising health care costs have led to increasing focus on cost containment and accountability from health care providers. We sought to explore surgeon awareness of supply costs for open and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.Methods: Surveys were sent in 2015 to surgeons at 8 academic hospitals in Toronto who performed distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Respondents were asked to estimate the total cost, type and number of disposable equipment pieces required to perform open and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. We determined the accuracy of estimates through comparisons with procedural invoices for distal gastrectomy performed between Jan. 1, 2011, and Dec. 31, 2015. All values are in 2015 Canadian dollars.Results: Of the 53 surveys sent out, 12 were completed (response rate 23%). Surgeon estimates of total supply costs ranged from $500 to $3000 and from $1500 to $5000 for open and laparoscopic cases, respectively. Estimated supply costs for requested equipment ranged from $464 to $2055 for open cases and from $1870 to $2960 for laparoscopic cases. Invoices for actual equipment yielded a mean of $821 (standard deviation $543) (range $89–$2613) for open cases and $2678 (standard deviation $958) (range $835–$4102) for laparoscopic cases. Estimates of total cost were within 25% of the median invoice total in 1 response (9%) for open cases and 3 (27%) of those for laparoscopic cases.Conclusion: Respondents failed to accurately estimate equipment costs. The variation in true total costs and estimates of supply costs represents an opportunity for intraoperative cost minimization, efficient equipment selection and value-based purchasing arrangements. ER -