RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Incremental value and clinical impact of neck sonography for primary hyperparathyroidism: a risk-adjusted analysis JF Canadian Journal of Surgery JO CAN J SURG FD Canadian Medical Association SP 325 OP 331 DO 10.1503/cjs.015612 VO 56 IS 5 A1 May C. Tee A1 Simon K. Chan A1 Vy Nguyen A1 Scott S. Strugnell A1 Jonathan Yang A1 Steven Jones A1 Pari Tiwari A1 Daniel S. Levine A1 Sam M. Wiseman YR 2013 UL http://canjsurg.ca/content/56/5/325.abstract AB Background: Despite the different preoperative imaging modalities available for parathyroid adenoma localization, there is currently no uniform consensus on the most appropriate preoperative imaging algorithm that should be routinely followed prior to the surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). We sought to determine the incremental value of adding neck ultrasonography to scintigraphy-based imaging tests.Methods: In a single institution, surgically naive patients with PHPT underwent the following localization studies before parathyroidectomy: 1) Tc-99m sestamibi imaging with single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) or Tc-99m sestamibi imaging with SPECT alone, or 2) ultrasonography in addition to those tests. We retrospectively collected data and performed a multivariate analysis comparing group I (single study) to group II (addition of ultrasonography) and risk of bilateral (BNE) compared with unilateral (UNE) neck exploration.Results: Our study included 208 patients. Group II had 0.45 times the odds of BNE versus UNE compared with group I (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25–0.81, p = 0.008). When adjusting for patient age, sex, preoperative calcium level, use of intraoperative PTH monitoring, preoperative PTH level, adenoma size, and number of abnormal parathyroid glands, Group II had 0.48 times the odds of BNE versus UNE compared with group I (adjusted OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23–1.03, p = 0.06). In a subgroup analysis, only the addition of ultrasonography to SPECT decreased the risk of undergoing BNE compared with SPECT alone (unadjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19–0.84, p = 0.015; adjusted OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15–0.96, p = 0.043).Conclusion: The addition of ultrasonography to SPECT, but not to SPECT/CT, has incremental value in decreasing the extent of surgery during parathyroidectomy, even after adjusting for multiple confounding factors.