RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Assessing the acceptability of script concordance testing: a nationwide study in otolaryngology
JF Canadian Journal of Surgery
JO CAN J SURG
FD Canadian Medical Association
SP E317
OP E323
DO 10.1503/cjs.014919
VO 64
IS 3
A1 Andrée-Anne Leclerc
A1 Lily H.P. Nguyen
A1 Bernard Charlin
A1 Stuart Lubarsky
A1 Tareck Ayad
YR 2021
UL http://canjsurg.ca/content/64/3/E317.abstract
AB Background: Script concordance testing (SCT) is an objective method to evaluate clinical reasoning that assesses the ability to interpret medical information under conditions of uncertainty. Many studies have supported its validity as a tool to assess higher levels of learning, but little is known about its acceptability to major stakeholders. The aim of this study was to determine the acceptability of SCT to residents in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery (OTL-HNS) and a reference group of experts.Methods: In 2013 and 2016, a set of SCT questions, as well a post-test exit survey, were included in the National In-Training Examination (NITE) for OTL-HNS. This examination is administered to all OTL-HNS residents across Canada who are in the second to fifth year of residency. The same SCT questions and survey were then sent to a group of OTL-HNS surgeons from 4 Canadian universities.Results: For 64.4% of faculty and residents, the study was their first exposure to SCT. Overall, residents found it difficult to adapt to this form of testing, thought that the clinical scenarios were not clear and believed that SCT was not useful for assessing clinical reasoning. In contrast, the vast majority of experts felt that the test questions reflected real-life clinical situations and would recommend SCT as an evaluation method in OTL-HNS.Conclusion: Views about the acceptability of SCT as an assessment tool for clinical reasoning differed between OTL-HNS residents and experts. Education about SCT and increased exposure to this testing method are necessary to improve residents’ perceptions of SCT.