PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Jennifer S. Polus
AU  - Maxwell E. Perelgut
AU  - Edward M. Vasarhelyi
AU  - Matthew G. Teeter
AU  - Brent A. Lanting
TI  - Femoral stem migration after direct lateral and direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study
AID  - 10.1503/cjs.013221
DP  - 2022 Aug 02
TA  - Canadian Journal of Surgery
PG  - E487--E495
VI  - 65
IP  - 4
4099  - http://canjsurg.ca/content/65/4/E487.short
4100  - http://canjsurg.ca/content/65/4/E487.full
SO  - CAN J SURG2022 Aug 02; 65
AB  - Background: The direct lateral (DL) approach to total hip arthroplasty is more commonly used than the newer direct anterior (DA) approach. Both approaches use collared or collarless femoral stems. We sought to assess implant stability of stem designs implanted with the DL approach and compare outcomes from this cohort with those of a previously reported cohort of patients who underwent arthroplasty with a DA approach. We also sought to determine if early recovery influences differences in migration.Methods: Patients underwent total hip arthroplasty using the DL or the DA approach and were randomized to receive either a collared or collarless, cementless femoral stem. On the day of surgery and at 6 follow-up visits through to 1 year, patients underwent supine radiostereometric imaging to track implant migration. At follow-up visits, patients performed an instrumented walking test to assess their functional ability and logged an average daily step count to assess their activity levels. We assessed whether patient function and activity were correlated with migration.Results: Stem design did not have a significant effect on migration for the DL group (p = 0.894). Compared with the DA group, the DL group migrated significantly less for both collared (p = 0.031) and collarless (p = 0.002) stems. Migration was not correlated with function or activity at any time point (p > 0.05).Conclusion: Most implant migration occurred from the day of surgery to 2 weeks after the operation and stabilized thereafter, suggesting adequate fixation and a low risk for aseptic loosening in both patient groups.