PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Ogi Solaja AU - Husein Moloo AU - Erik Hopkins AU - Nadia Khan AU - Richard W. Gilbert AU - Amy Neville AU - Dalibor Kubelik AU - Donna Maziak AU - Neal Rowe AU - Michael Odell AU - Moein Momtazi TI - Implementation, results and face validity of the Consultation and Relational Empathy measure in a Canadian department of surgery AID - 10.1503/cjs.003721 DP - 2022 Nov 08 TA - Canadian Journal of Surgery PG - E749--E755 VI - 65 IP - 6 4099 - http://canjsurg.ca/content/65/6/E749.short 4100 - http://canjsurg.ca/content/65/6/E749.full SO - CAN J SURG2022 Nov 08; 65 AB - Background: The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure, a validated questionnaire designed to assess patients’ perceptions of their physician’s communication skills and empathy, has been used to assess empathy in medical specialties but has seldom been applied to surgery. We assessed empathy and communication skills among a group of surgeons within a single academic institution.Methods: All surgeons within our department of surgery were invited to participate. Patients seen in clinics of participating surgeons were recruited prospectively from July 2018 to February 2019. At the end of each clinical encounter, they were asked to complete a CARE survey. Surveys were analyzed according to previously validated inclusion and exclusion criteria. We calculated mean scores for each surgeon and surgical division. About 6 months after study completion, surgeons were provided with their individual score and de-identified division scores, and were asked to complete a follow-up survey assessing their attitudes toward the CARE Measure.Results: Of the 82 surgeons invited, 51 (62%) agreed to participate; 7 had fewer than 25 completed surveys and were excluded from analysis. A total of 1801 surveys for 44 surgeons (33 male and 11 female) were included in the final analysis. The average CARE score across the department was 46.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 46.6–47.1). Female surgeons received significantly higher scores than male surgeons (mean 47.6 [95% CI 47.1–48.0] v. 46.7 [95% CI 46.4–48.0]). Of the 35 surgeons who responded to the follow-up survey, 31 (89%) felt that the questions in the CARE Measure applied to their practice, and half of these reported that they intended to make changes in response to the feedback.Conclusion: We found high communication and empathy scores among surgeons in the outpatient setting, with enough variability to encourage continued improvement. The CARE Measure appears to have face validity among surgeons, and the vast majority found it relevant to their practice. Further study is needed to formally assess the relevance, performance, reliability and construct validity of this measure.