Table 1

Characteristics of self-identified case–control studies (CCs) in 6 surgical journals, 1995–2000, and factors associated with their being verified as such

VariableSelf-ID’d CCs, no. (& %)Verified as true epidemiologic CCs*
No. (& %)OR95% CIp value
Journal
American Journal of Surgery4 (7)1 (25)0.30–3.8
Annals of Surgery4 (7)2 (50)0.80.1–8.8
Archives of Surgery30 (55)9 (30)0.30.1–1.7
British Journal of Surgery7 (13)4 (57)1.0
Journal of the ACS6 (11)2 (33)0.40–3.6
Surgery4 (7)1 (25)0.30–3.8
Total case–control studies55 (100)19 (35)
Number of authors0.88
 2 or 313 (24)4 (31)1.0
 4 or 518 (33)7 (39)1.40.3–6.5
 6 or more24 (44)8 (33)1.10.3–4.8
Focus on a surgical procedure28 (51)5 (18)0.20.1–0.70.011
 Not on a surgical procedure27 (49)14 (52)1.0
Logistic regression analysis used14 (25)8 (57)3.60.1–12.90.045
 Not used41 (75)11 (27)1.0
Odds ratios reported11 (20)9 (82)15.32.8–82.60.002
 Not reported44 (80)10 (23)1.0
  • * Percentages are of self-identified case–control studies; the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated for each variable by logistic regression; p values are for the Wald test of the null hypothesis that none of the categories of the variable was associated with being a true case–control study.

  • The referent category for the regression model.

  • ACS = American College of Surgeons; CCs = case–control studies; ID’d = identified; OR = odds ratio.

  • Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.