Table 1

Summary of findings for povidone-iodine irrigation to prevent surgical site infection

StudyYearCountryLevelStudy designPopulationPADefinition of infectionInterventionComparisonOutcome(+/−)*
Age, yrSurgical procedure
Surgery in general
Sindelar and Mason (3), (4)1977; 1979United StatesIIRCT9–80Included general and urologic procedures (n = 500)YPus from incision site within 12 wk after surgery along with bacteria recovered from wound culture10% povidone-iodine irrigation (n = 242)Saline irrigation (n = 258)+
Singh et al (7)1988IndiaIIProspective comparative studyNAVarious clean or contaminated operations (n = 90)NNA5% povidone-iodine irrigation (n = 30)5% povidone-iodine irrigation + 5 mg/mL of metronidazole (n = 30)
Sterile normal saline irrigation (n = 30)
General surgery
Barr (8)1978United StatesIIProspective comparative studyNAGastrointestinalNNABetadine lavage (n = 35)No lavage (n = 60)+
Sindelar and Mason (9)1979United StatesIIRCTLaparotomy (n = 168)YAbscess formation1% povidone-iodine irrigationSaline irrigation+
de Jong et al (10)1982The NetherlandsIIRCT≥ 5Intra-abdominal or inguinal hernia operationsNDischarge from wound within 4 wk after surgery or a positive culture of fluid from wound1% povidone-iodine irrigation (n = 154)No irrigation (n = 142)
10% povidone-iodine irrigation (n = 149)No irrigation (n = 137)
Tighe et al (11)1982IrelandIIRCT3.5–74Appendectomy (n = 131)YPresence of pus with or without probing1% Betadine irrigation (n = 49)Sterile water irrigation (n = 31)
No irrigation (n = 51)
Rogers et al (12)1983United StatesIIRCTMean 60.2General surgery (n = 187)YPus from wound within 1 mo of surgery10% povidone-iodine (1% available iodine) irrigation (n = 86)Normal saline irrigation (n = 101)
Johnson et al (13)1985United KingdomIIRCTIntervention group: mean 68.3 (range 48–86) Comparison group: mean 67.2 (range 52–80)Abdomino–perineal excision of the rectum for carcinoma or proctectomy for carcinoma (n = 56)NPurulent wound discharge or wound discharge with bacteria cultured1% povidone-iodine irrigation (n = 28)Sterile normal saline irrigation (n = 28)+
Parker et al (14)1985United KingdomIIRCTIntervention group: mean 69 Comparison group: mean 68Major resection for large bowel carcinoma (n = 45)YPus discharging from wound10% aqueous povidone-iodine irrigation (n = 22)Water irrigation (n = 23)+
Sindelar et al (15)1985United StatesIIRCTIntervention group: mean 51.5 (range 19–75) Comparison group: mean 51.7 (range 20–69) Overall: mean 51.4 (range 19–75)intra-abdominal (n = 75)YNA1% povidone-iodine (0.1% available iodine) irrigation (n = 37)Saline irrigation (n = 38)+
Cardiovascular surgery
Angelini et al (16)1990United KingdomIIProspective comparative studyIntervention group: mean 61 Comparison group: mean 58Early repeat sternotomy for postoperative hemorrhage (n = 43)YPresence of purulent discharge along with a positive culture for bacteriaAqueous povidone-iodine irrigation (n = 22)No irrigation (n = 21)+
Ko et al (17)1992United StatesISingle-blind RCTNACardiopulmon-ary bypass surgery with sternotomy incision (n = 1980)YUnusual pain, fever, tenderness, induration, drainage or erythemaPovidone-iodine (0.5% in NaCl) irrigation (n = 990)Saline (0.9% in NaCl) irrigation (n = 990)
Orthopedic surgery
Cheng et al (18)2005TaiwanISingle-blind RCTintervention group: mean 64 Comparison group: mean 61Spinal surgery (n = 414)YUnusual pain, fever, tenderness, induration, drainage or erythema0.35% povidone-iodine irrigation (n = 208)Normal saline irrigation (n = 206)+
Chang et al (19)2006TaiwanISingle-blind RCTIntervention group: mean 67.1 (range 20–82) Comparison group mean 65.4 (range 22–89)Primary instrumental lumbosacral posterolateral fusion due to degenerative spinal disorder with segmental instability (n = 244)YNA0.35% povidone-iodine irrigation (n = 120)Normal saline irrigation (n = 124)+
Urologic surgery
Richter et al (20)1991IsraelIIProspective comparative studymean 64 (range 55–90)Open prostatectomy (n = 156)YRedness, swelling, pus with a positive cultureNANo irrigation (n = 76)+
  • PA = prophylactic antibiotics; Y = yes; N = no; RCT = randomized controlled trial; NA = not available; NaCl = sodium chloride;

  • * + = intervention was significantly more effective than comparison; − = intervention was not significantly more effective than comparison.