Table 1

Reporting quality of included studies

Study type; studyAdequately reported items, no. *Adequately reported items, %
Randomized controlled trials
Beaulieu et al. 2006 (34)24/3565.6
Blake et al. 2006 (13)15/3444.1
Frank et al. 2008 (35)27/3479.4
Kantor and Hopper 1981 (50)2/336.0
Levin et al. 2017 (24)31/3588.6
Nonrandomized studies
Cohort study
 Holdcroft et al. 2006 (29)14/3342.4
Case series and case reports
 Aggarwal et al. 2009 (30)13/2650.0
 Barbosa-Hernandez et al. 2013 (31)10/2638.5
 Gofeld et al. 2005 (36)14/2653.8
 Haroutiunian et al. 2011 (52)8/2630.8
 Haroutiunian et al. 2008 (31)11/2642.3
 Haroutiunian et al. 2016 (37)19/2673.0
 Hornby et al. 2009 (38)17/2665.4
 Ware et al. 2002 (39)18/2669.2
Surveys
 Harris et al. 2000 (53)6/1060.0
 Hazekamp et al. 2013 (25)8/1080.0
 Piper et al. 2017 (54)6/1060.0
 Ste-Marie et al. 2016 (26)10/10100
 Swift et al. 2005 (27)8/1080.0
 Walsh et al. 2013 (28)8/1080.0
Qualitative study
 Peters 2013 (55)11/2152.4
Systematic reviews
Campbell et al. 2001 (45)18/2572.0
Covarrubias-Gomez 2008 (48)5/2520.0
Deshpande et al. 2015 (41)17/2568.0
Fitzcharles et al. 2016 (42)18/2572.0
Hwang et al. 2016 (32)11/2544.0
Khaiser et al. 2016 (33)12/2548.0
Kung et al. 2011 (49)6/2722.2
Lynch and Ware 2015 (46)16/2564.0
MacFarlane et al. 2011 (47)16/2564.0
Martín-Sánchez et al. 2009 (43)21/2777.8
Stevens and Higgins 2017 (44)20/2676.9
Wang et al. 2008 (40)17/2568.0
  • * Denominators may differ across studies because we judged some items to be not applicable and did not count them in the denominator when we calculated the percentage of adequately reported items.

  • Abstract only.