Reporting quality of included studies
Study type; study | Adequately reported items, no. * | Adequately reported items, % |
---|---|---|
Randomized controlled trials | ||
Beaulieu et al. 2006 (34) | 24/35 | 65.6 |
Blake et al. 2006 (13) | 15/34 | 44.1 |
Frank et al. 2008 (35) | 27/34 | 79.4 |
Kantor and Hopper 1981 (50)† | 2/33 | 6.0 |
Levin et al. 2017 (24) | 31/35 | 88.6 |
Nonrandomized studies | ||
Cohort study | ||
Holdcroft et al. 2006 (29) | 14/33 | 42.4 |
Case series and case reports | ||
Aggarwal et al. 2009 (30) | 13/26 | 50.0 |
Barbosa-Hernandez et al. 2013 (31)† | 10/26 | 38.5 |
Gofeld et al. 2005 (36) | 14/26 | 53.8 |
Haroutiunian et al. 2011 (52)† | 8/26 | 30.8 |
Haroutiunian et al. 2008 (31) | 11/26 | 42.3 |
Haroutiunian et al. 2016 (37) | 19/26 | 73.0 |
Hornby et al. 2009 (38) | 17/26 | 65.4 |
Ware et al. 2002 (39) | 18/26 | 69.2 |
Surveys | ||
Harris et al. 2000 (53) | 6/10 | 60.0 |
Hazekamp et al. 2013 (25) | 8/10 | 80.0 |
Piper et al. 2017 (54) | 6/10 | 60.0 |
Ste-Marie et al. 2016 (26) | 10/10 | 100 |
Swift et al. 2005 (27) | 8/10 | 80.0 |
Walsh et al. 2013 (28) | 8/10 | 80.0 |
Qualitative study | ||
Peters 2013 (55) | 11/21 | 52.4 |
Systematic reviews | ||
Campbell et al. 2001 (45) | 18/25 | 72.0 |
Covarrubias-Gomez 2008 (48)† | 5/25 | 20.0 |
Deshpande et al. 2015 (41) | 17/25 | 68.0 |
Fitzcharles et al. 2016 (42) | 18/25 | 72.0 |
Hwang et al. 2016 (32) | 11/25 | 44.0 |
Khaiser et al. 2016 (33) | 12/25 | 48.0 |
Kung et al. 2011 (49)† | 6/27 | 22.2 |
Lynch and Ware 2015 (46) | 16/25 | 64.0 |
MacFarlane et al. 2011 (47) | 16/25 | 64.0 |
Martín-Sánchez et al. 2009 (43) | 21/27 | 77.8 |
Stevens and Higgins 2017 (44) | 20/26 | 76.9 |
Wang et al. 2008 (40) | 17/25 | 68.0 |