Table 1

Level I evidence studies

CharacteristicSmekal et al. (43)Ferran et al. (44)Judd et al. (18)
DesignRCT: intramedullary fixation v. nonoperative treatmentRCT: intramedullary fixation v. plate fixationRCT: intramedullary fixation v. nonoperative treatment
No. of intramedullary fixations601729
Type of intramedullary fixationTitanium endomedullary nailRockwood pinHagie pin
Follow-up, mean (range) mo24 (22–27)12 (5–28)3 (1–12)
Major complication rate, no. (%)
 Bone-healing problem
  Nonunion001 (3)
  Delayed union2 (3)01 (3)
  (Symptomatic) malunion00NA
 Infection, deepNANA2 (7)
 Implant breakage/failure/irritation, mechanical failure2 (3)1 (6)1 (3)
 Refracture after pin removal1 (2)NA2 (7)
Minor complication rate, no. (%)
 Implant breakage/failure/irritation
  Irritation5 (5)1 (6)9 (31)
  Migration/telescoping7 (12)NANA
  (Medial/lateral) protrusion12 (20)NANA
 Infection, wound1 (2)04 (14)
 Routine nail removalNA17 (100)26 (90)
 Nonroutine nail removal003 (10)
 Neurovascular problem
  Brachial plexus symptoms02 (12)1 (3)
  Regional pain syndrome00NA
 Intramedullary fixation device shortening12 (20)NANA
  • NA = not applicable (complication not mentioned in study); RCT = randomized controlled trial.