Table 1

Characteristics of studies included in our review and meta-analysis

CharacteristicCugura et al. (35), (37)Jacob et al. (38)Bucher et al. (36)Surgit et al. (41)Agrawal et al. (39)Tran (15)Do et al. (19)Chung et al. (42)He et al. (43)Tai et al. (44)*Shih et al. (47)Kim et al. (46)
No. of patients13423166810100373060
Age, yr (range)60NRNR48.4 (23–67)65.5 (21–87)44 (18–83)43.7 (28–64)48 (18–82)64.6 (49–73)46.5 (21–80)*NR58.5 (24–85)
Sex, male:female1:02:118:516:066:210:085:153:058:2
Surgical technique
 Preperitoneal spacemakerBalloonBalloonNo balloonBalloonNo balloonBalloonBalloonBalloonNo balloonBalloonBalloonNo balloon
 Ports3 ports via 1 incisionSingle port deviceSingle port deviceSingle port deviceSingle port deviceSingle port deviceSingle port device3 ports via 1 incisionSingle port device3 ports via 1 incision*3 ports via 1 incision3 ports via 1 incision
 Camera45°30°30°30°30°30°30°*30°
 InstrumentsStandard straightStandard straightStandard straightArticulating/standardStandard straightCurvedCurved/standardStandard straightStandard straightStandard straight*Curved, manually bentStandard straight
 Incision length, cm (range)2.52.5Larger than standard TEP23 (2.5–4.5)2.52.8 (2.3–3.2)221.5*22–2.5
 FixedYesTacksTacksTacksTacks, glueNo fixationTacksTacks*TacksTacks
Duration of surgery; n, min (range) or min ± SD60 (52–64)64.2 (40–175)
 Unilateral hernian = 1, 90NAn = 3n = 19, 48.4 (32–62)n = 13, 40 (25–75)n = 36, 50 (35–90)n = 10, 53.6 (45–65)n = 83NA60n = 24, 98.3 ± 26.7n = 57; indirect: 65.2 (33–150), direct: 52.6 (32–80)
 Bilateral herniasNAn = 3, 79.3n = 1n = 4, 96.7 (85–120)n = 3, 70 (60–75)n = 32, 80 (60–125)NAn = 17n = 3, 41 (26–65)78.5 (52–110)n = 6, 121.4 ± 13.5n = 3, 77 (66–90)
Hospital stay, d (range)21, not recorded for 2 patients1.17 (1–2)< 11 overnight patient21.54 (1–11)31.41.852.15
Conversion001, bleeding; 1 extra port inserted1, large hernia and adhesions; 2 extra ports inserted01, unable to deploy port; 2 extra ports inserted02, peritoneal tear and adhesions; LESS TAPP performed0001, omental incarceration, conversion to TAPP
Intraoperative complications, no.001, bleeding0001, peritoneal tearNo major complications00
Postoperative recoveryUneventfulUneventfulUneventfulUneventfulUneventfulUneventfulUneventful2 had urinary retentionUneventful1 had ileus and seroma2 had seroma2: 1 had seroma, 1 had urinary retention
Patient satisfaction (scale: 1–5)None were dissatisfied87.5% satisfied*
Painn = 1, transient pain in testicle postoperativelyMost patients stopped analgesics within 48 hNo complaints of pain5 patients had groin acheMinimal pain at discharge
Return to activity, d7–145.6 (1–30)
Other follow-upNo wound complicationsEarly complications: 1 epididymitis, 1 wound infection, 1 wound dehiscience, 11 seroma/haematomaNo wound complicationsNo wound complications reported
 2 wkNo complications
 1 mon = 1, no complications
 2–3 mon = 2, minor wound complications
 10–14 mo
Recurrence, no.None at 2 wkNone at 14 wkNone at 1 moNone at 2–3 moNone at 1–10 moNone at 1 mo1 and 10 moNone at 1 moNone at 6 mo
  • NR = not reported; SD = standard deviation; TAPP = transabdominal preperitoneal; TEP = totally extraperitoneal.

  • * Results combined with TAPP hernia repairs.