Table 4

Sensitivity analysis for fat embolism syndrome among pooled studies

VariableGroup; no. (%)Heterogeneity, p valueRisk (95% CI)
SteroidControlAbsolute differenceRelative
Steroid dose
 MPS > 9 mg/kg (14), (17), (42), (46)3/97 (3.1)20/123 (16.3)0.590.11 (0.04 to 0.19)0.27 (0.08 to 0.92)
 MPS ≤ 9 mg/kg (43), (44)2/87 (2.3)16/82 (20)0.360.17 (0.08 to 0.26)0.12 (0.03 to 0.50)
Quality score
 > 50 (17), (42) (44)3/137 (2.2)29/154 (19)0.580.16 (0.09 to 0.22)0.16 (0.05 to 0.49)
 ≤ 50 (14), (46)2/47 (4.3)7/51 (13.7)0.700.08 (−0.03 to 0.19)0.35 (0.06 to 1.9)
Blinding
 Blinded (14), (17), (42), (43)4/124 (3.2)24/140 (17.1)0.760.13 (0.06 to 0.20)0.23 (0.08 to 0.69)
 Not blinded (44), (46)1/60 (1.7)12/65 (18.5)0.120.14 (−0.01 to 0.29)0.20 (0.03 to 1.2)
Randomization
 Randomized (14), (17), (42), (46)3/97 (3.1)20/123 (16.3)0.590.11 (0.04 to 0.19)0.27 (0.08 to 0.92)
 Quasi-randomized (43), (44)2/87 (2.3)16/82 (19.5)0.360.17 (0.08 to 0.26)0.12 (0.03 to 0.52)
  • CI = confidence interval; FES = fat embolism syndrome; MPS = methylprednisolone succinate.