Table 1

Summary of findings of included studies

StudyCountryLength of follow-up, yrNo. of Aboriginal patients/no. of non-Aboriginal patientsM/F gender, %Baseline population age, mean ± SD,* yrFindings
Chang et al., (13) 2018US4651/92 27945.7/54.371.9 ± 11.9
  • Incidence of major amputation within 1 yr after diagnosis of DFU was higher for Native American patients than White patients (4.1% v. 1.0%, p < 0.001)

  • In multivariable analysis, being Native American was associated with increased risk of major amputation compared to being White (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.62–3.62)

Commons et al., (22) 2015Australia1114/6359.9/40.154.4 (95% CI 28.8–80.1)
  • Indigenous patients were younger than non-Indigenous patients (50.5 [95% CI 28.3–72.6] yr v. 61.6 [95% CI 36.1–87.1] yr) and had higher incidence of major amputation (RR 4.1 [95% CI 1.6–10.7]) and minor amputation (RR 6.2 [95% CI 3.5–11.1])

Jia et al., (23) 2017Australia166/44168/3262.9 ± 12.8
  • Independent risk factors for infection: ulcers healed between 3 and 12 mo (OR 2.3 [95% CI 1.6–3.3]), deep ulcers (OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.2–3.9]), peripheral neuropathy (OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.1–2.9]), previous foot ulcers (OR 1.7 [95% CI 1.2–2.4]), foot deformity (OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.0–2.0]), female gender (OR 1.5 [95% CI 1.1–2.1]) and age (OR 0.98 [95% CI 0.97–0.99])

  • No association found between infection and Indigenous background

Rodrigues et al., (24) 2016Australia323/10662.8/37.263.43 ± 14.07 (CI 60.98–65.89)
  • Indigenous group had higher amputation rate than non-Indigenous group (56.5% v. 29.2%)

  • Mean age at amputation was similar in Indigenous (62 [SD 12.5] yr [95% CI 55.09–70.14 yr]) and non-Indigenous (62.0 [SD 11.5] yr [95% CI 57.81–66.25 yr]) groups

Rose et al., (25) 2008Canada1101/22463/3759 ± 14 (Aboriginal 55 ± 13, non-Aboriginal 61 ± 14)
  • Aboriginal patients had higher rate of any amputation than non-Aboriginal patients (24% v. 15%), but frequency of major amputation (defined in this study as amputation proximal to toes) was not influenced by ethnicity

  • Aboriginal patients had shorter average time from initial clinic visit to major lower-extremity amputation than non-Aboriginal patients (50 [SD 64] wk v. 62 [SD 56] wk, p < 0.01)

  • Living in rural or reserve community was correlated with shorter average time from initial clinic visit to major lower-extremity amputation than living in urban community (45 [SD 56] wk v. 66 [SD 61] wk, p < 0.002)

  • Aboriginal ethnicity was not associated with poorer clinical outcome when nonurban residence was controlled for

  • Earlier major lower-extremity amputation was significantly associated with nonurban residence, Aboriginal ethnicity and arterial insufficiency on univariate analysis; however, when nonurban residence was controlled for, Aboriginal ethnicity was not associated with earlier amputation

Tan et al., (26) 2019US121654/149 07066.6/33.459.2 ± 13.7 (Aboriginal 54.4 ± 13.3, White 60.7 ± 13.4)
  • Native American patients had increasing trend of major amputation over study period

  • Native American patients had significantly higher major amputation rates than White patients (5.4% v. 7.1%, p < 0.001) and higher risk of major amputation (OR 1.47 [95% CI 1.2–1.8])

  • Native American patients had lowest rates of open bypass (0.9%) and endovascular revascularization (5.0%) of all ethnic groups studied (p < 0.001)

  • CI = confidence interval; DFU = diabetic foot ulcer; F = female; HR = hazard ratio; M = male; OR = odds ratio; RR = relative risk; SD = standard deviation.

  • * Except where noted otherwise.