Table 2

Clinical history and findings on evaluation of Charcot arthropathy at a tertiary care specialty foot clinic*

VariableNo. of feet (%)
Treatment setting at initial diagnosis
 Community physician52 (67)
 Time between community physician and foot clinic evaluations, wk, mean ± SD3 ± 5
 Already a patient at foot clinic26 (33)
Affected foot
 Right41 (53)
 Left37 (47)
Foot trauma in preceding 6 mo
 Yes17 (22)
 No61 (78)
Swollen, erythematous, warm foot
 Yes75 (96)
 No3 (4)
Skin status of affected foot
 Ulcer present§23 (29)
 No ulcer55 (71)
Palpation of pedal pulse
 Normal or increased65 (83)
 Decreased13 (17)
Foot protective sensation (monofilament testing)
 Intact11 (14)
 Absent67 (86)
Hemoglobin A1c 6 mo before presentation (% glycated), mean ± SD9 ± 2
Charcot arthropathy confirmed by radiograph
 Yes73 (94)
 No5 (6)
Eichenholtz stage
 0 (at risk because of acute sprain or fracture)5 (6)
 1 (development–fragmentation)64 (82)
 2 (coalescence)9 (12)
 3 (reconstruction–consolidation)0 (0)
Modified Brodsky classification**
 Type 1 (midfoot)63 (83)
 Type 2 (hindfoot)7 (9)
 Type 4 (multiple)1 (1)
 Type 5 (forefoot)5 (7)
  • SD = standard deviation.

  • * n = 78 feet in 76 patients. Median time from initial observation of problem until evaluation in foot clinic for all feet, 1 wk.

  • Unless indicated otherwise.

  • Treatment by community physician: removable walker brace, 9 feet (17%); total contact cast, 5 feet (10%); other orthosis, 2 feet (4%); none, 36 feet (69%).

  • § Ulcer: not infected, 13 ulcers (57%); infected, 10 ulcers (43%).

  • Hemoglobin A1c available for only 25 feet (25 patients).

  • ** Modified Brodsky type unknown in 2 feet (2 patients).

  • There were 4 patients with unilateral type 3A (tibiotalar) who were excluded and no feet with type 3B (calcaneus).