Abstract
Objective
To describe the radiological findings of “Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation”(BPOP)—otherwise known as Nora’s lesion, to describe the natural evolution of BPOP and to assess radiologically if BPOP is indeed part of a spectrum of reactive lesions including florid reactive periostitis and turret exostosis.
Design
Four experienced musculoskeletal radiologists studied plain radiographs and other imaging documents of histologically-proven Nora’s lesions, looking for soft-tissue changes, periosteal reaction/calcification and calcified/ossified pseudotumours, and compared those findings with findings on pathology reviewed by a peer group of pathologists.
Patients
Twenty-four Nora’s lesions originating from a series of 200 consecutive, histologically-verified bone (pseudo)tumours of the hand, seen by the “Netherlands Committee on Bone Tumours” for review and second opinion.
Results
Nora’s lesions have a recognised presentation on radiographs without specific MR characteristics. Natural evolution could be assessed retrospectively in four cases. Recurrent lesions were seen in seven cases and are difficult to differentiate from primary lesions.
Conclusions
Nora’s lesion, defined as a “well-marginated mass of heterotopic mineralization arising from the periosteal aspect of an intact cortex, without medullary changes” has a distinct radiological presentation and is part of a spectrum of reactive lesions which includes florid reactive periostitis and turret exostosis. As it has a distinct radiological appearance, differential diagnosis of malignant lesions such as osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma should be clear. It does not require immediate biopsy unless the natural evolution is unspecific.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nora FE, Dahlin DC, Beabout JW. Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferations of hand and feet. Am J Surg Pathol 1983;7:245–250
Torreggiani WC, Munk PL, Al-Ismail K, et al. MR imaging features of bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation of bone (Nora’s lesion). Eur J Radiol 2001;40:224–231
Sundaram M, Wang L, Rotman M, Howard R, Saboeiro AP. Florid reactive periostitis and bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation: pre-biopsy imaging evolution, treatment and outcome. Skelet Radiol 2001;30:192–198
Meneses MF, Unni KK, Swee RG. Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation of bone (Nora’s lesion). Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17 7:691–697
Bandiera S, Bacchini P, Bertoni F. Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation of bone. Skelet Radiol 1998;27:154–156
Cooper PN, Malcolm AJ. A bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation of the radius. Histopathology 1993;22:78–80
Dahlin DC, Unni KK. Bone tumours: general aspects and data on 8542 cases. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 1986
Abramovici L, Steiner GC. Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation of bone (Nora’s lesion) : a retrospective study of 12 cases, 2 arising in long bones. Human Pathol 2002;33:1205–1210
Orui H, Ishikawa A, Tsuchiya T, Ogino T. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation of the hand: A case report. J Hand Surg 2002;27A:1104–1108
Dorfman HD, Czerniak B. Bone tumors. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1998
Yuen M, Friedman L, Orr W, Cockshott WP. Proliferative periosteal processes of phalanges: a unitary hypothesis. Skelet Radiol 1992;21:301–303
Rosenberg L. Chemical basis for histological use of Safranin O in the study of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 1971;A53:69–82
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dhondt, E., Oudenhoven, L., Khan, S. et al. Nora’s lesion, a distinct radiological entity?. Skeletal Radiol 35, 497–502 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-005-0041-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-005-0041-9