Abstract
Purpose
We evaluated the risk of hypersensitivity to metals in a population of consecutive subjects undergoing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We also proposed a diagnostic pathway to address any sensitivity to metals. We finally presented the mid-term outcomes of a full non allergenic knee implant.
Methods
We developed a protocol based on the medical history, patch testing, and on specific laboratory assays, in order to assess a sensitization to metals. Twenty-four patients (25 knees) with referred or suspected allergy to metals were found in more than 1,000 treated patients, with a mean age of 72.9 years. We proceeded to a radiologic study, a clinical evaluation by the visual analogic scale (VAS), and Knee Society rating system (KSS). In all cases a full anallergic cemented implant with an oxidized zirconium femoral component and an all-polyethylene tibial baseplate was chosen.
Results
Four (16.6%) of the 24 patients were considered to be hypersensitive to metals. The mean follow-up was 79.2 months. No patient reported any reaction related to hypersensitivity or complications after TKA. The VAS improved from a mean preoperative value of 7.2 to 1.8 postoperatively; the KSS and the functional score increased from 38 to 91 points and from 39 to 88 points, respectively.
Conclusions
We consider careful research of medical history for metals hypersensitivity crucial, and we perform patch testing and lab assays in case of doubtful sensitization. The choice of a modern hypoallergenic implant may prevent any kind of potential reactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Möller H (1990) Nickel dermatitis: problems solved and unsolved. Contact Dermatitis 23:217–220
Goh CL (1986) Prevalence of contact allergy by sex, race and age. Contact Dermatitis 14:237–240
Hallab NJ, Merritt K, Jacobs JJ (2001) Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:428–436
Elves MW, Wilson JN, Scales JT, Kemp HBS (1975) Incidence of metal sensitivity in patients with total joint replacements. Br Med J 4:376–378
Menné T, Nieboer E (1989) Metal contact dermatitis: a common and potentially debilitating disease. Endeavour 13:117–122
Balato N, Lembo G, Patruno C, Ayala F (1991) Generalized dermatitis due to an osteosynthesis screw. Contact Dermatitis 24:310
Deutman R, Mulder TJ, Brian R, Nater JP (1977) Metal sensitivity before and after total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:862–865
Hallab NJ, Caicedo M, Finnegan A, Jacobs JJ (2008) Th1 type lymphocyte reactivity to metals in patients with total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 3:6
Carulli C, Villano M, Bucciarelli G, Martini C, Innocenti M (2011) Painful knee arthroplasty: definition and overview. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 8:23–25
Villano M, Carulli C, Puccini S, Soderi S, Innocenti M (2011) Painful knee arthroplasty: surgical approach. Clin Case Bone Miner Metab 8:26–28
Hallab NJ, Jacobs JJ (2009) Biologic effects of implant debris. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 67:182–188
Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, Flury R, Windler M, Köster G, Lohmann CH (2005) Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:28–36
Jacobs JJ, Hallab NJ (2006) Loosening and osteolysis associated with metal-on-metal bearings: a local effect of metal hypersensitivity? J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1171–1172
McKenzie AW, Aitken CV, Ridsdill-Smith R (1967) Urticaria after insertion of Smith-Petersen Vitallium nail. Br Med J 5570:36
Thienpont E, Berger Y (2013) No allergic reaction after TKA in a chrome-cobalt-nickel-sensitive patient: case report and review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:636–640
Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ (2009) Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2606–2612
Keeney JA, Eunice S, Pashos G, Wright RW, Clohisy JC (2011) What is the evidence for total knee arthroplasty in young patients? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:574–583
Merritt K, Rodrigo JJ (1996) Immune response to synthetic materials. Sensitization of patients receiving orthopaedic implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 326:71–79
Innocenti M, Civinini R, Carulli C, Villano M, Linari S, Morfini M (2007) A modular total knee arthroplasty in haemophilic arthropathy. Knee 14:264–268
Majima T, Yasuda K, Tago H, Aoki Y, Minami A (2008) Clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament retaining TKA with alumina ceramic condylar prosthesis: comparison to Co-Cr alloy prosthesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:152–156
Innocenti M, Civinini R, Carulli C, Matassi F, Villano M (2010) The 5-year results of an oxidized zirconium femoral component for TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1258–1263
Iida T, Minoda Y, Kadoya Y, Matsui Y, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H, Ikebuchi M, Yoshida T, Nakamura H (2012) Mid-term clinical results of alumina medial pivot total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1514–1519
Hallab NJ, Mikecz K, Jacobs JJ (2000) A triple assay technique for the evaluation of metal-induced, delayed-type hypersensitivity responses in patients with or receiving total joint arthroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res 53:480–489
Everness KM, Gawkrodger DJ, Botham PA, Hunter JA (1990) The discrimination between nickel-sensitive and non-nickel-sensitive subjects by an in vitro lymphocyte transformation test. Br J Dermat 122:293–298
Hallab NJ, Caicedo M, Epstein R, McAllister K, Jacobs JJ (2010) In vitro reactivity to implant metals demonstrates a person-dependent association with both T-cell and B-cell activation. J Biomed Mater Res 92:667–682
White SE, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, Anthony M, Poggie RA (1994) Simulated knee wear with cobalt chromium and oxidized zirconium knee femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:176–184
Ries MD, Salehi A, Widding K, Hunter G (2002) Polyethylene wear performance of oxidized zirconium and cobalt-chromium knee components under abrasive conditions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(suppl 2):129–135
Hernigou P, Nogier A, Manicom O, Poignard A, De Abreu L, Filippini P (2004) Alternative femoral bearing surface options for knee replacement in young patients. Knee 11:169–172
Norgren B, Dalén T, Nilsson KG (2004) All-poly tibial component better than metal-backed: a randomized RSA study. Knee 11:189–196
Dojcinovic S, Ait Si Selmi T, Servien E, Verdonk PC, Neyret P (2007) A comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 93:364–372
Browne JA, Gall Sims SE, Giuseffi SA, Trousdale RT (2011) All-polyethylene tibial components in modern total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19:527–535
Nouta KA, Verra WC, Pijls BG, Schoones JW, Nelissen RG (2012) All-polyethylene tibial components are equal to metal-backed components: systematic review and meta-regression. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3549–3559
Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12
Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13
Yang J, Merritt K (1994) Detection of antibodies against corrosion products in patients after Co-Cr total joint replacements. Biomed Mater Res 28:1249–1258
Acknowledgments
The authors state that they had no funding or any conflict of interests, which may have produced a bias in the preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Innocenti, M., Carulli, C., Matassi, F. et al. Total knee arthroplasty in patients with hypersensitivity to metals. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 38, 329–333 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2229-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2229-2