Skip to main content
Log in

Total knee arthroplasty in patients with hypersensitivity to metals

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated the risk of hypersensitivity to metals in a population of consecutive subjects undergoing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We also proposed a diagnostic pathway to address any sensitivity to metals. We finally presented the mid-term outcomes of a full non allergenic knee implant.

Methods

We developed a protocol based on the medical history, patch testing, and on specific laboratory assays, in order to assess a sensitization to metals. Twenty-four patients (25 knees) with referred or suspected allergy to metals were found in more than 1,000 treated patients, with a mean age of 72.9 years. We proceeded to a radiologic study, a clinical evaluation by the visual analogic scale (VAS), and Knee Society rating system (KSS). In all cases a full anallergic cemented implant with an oxidized zirconium femoral component and an all-polyethylene tibial baseplate was chosen.

Results

Four (16.6%) of the 24 patients were considered to be hypersensitive to metals. The mean follow-up was 79.2 months. No patient reported any reaction related to hypersensitivity or complications after TKA. The VAS improved from a mean preoperative value of 7.2 to 1.8 postoperatively; the KSS and the functional score increased from 38 to 91 points and from 39 to 88 points, respectively.

Conclusions

We consider careful research of medical history for metals hypersensitivity crucial, and we perform patch testing and lab assays in case of doubtful sensitization. The choice of a modern hypoallergenic implant may prevent any kind of potential reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Möller H (1990) Nickel dermatitis: problems solved and unsolved. Contact Dermatitis 23:217–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goh CL (1986) Prevalence of contact allergy by sex, race and age. Contact Dermatitis 14:237–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hallab NJ, Merritt K, Jacobs JJ (2001) Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:428–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elves MW, Wilson JN, Scales JT, Kemp HBS (1975) Incidence of metal sensitivity in patients with total joint replacements. Br Med J 4:376–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Menné T, Nieboer E (1989) Metal contact dermatitis: a common and potentially debilitating disease. Endeavour 13:117–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Balato N, Lembo G, Patruno C, Ayala F (1991) Generalized dermatitis due to an osteosynthesis screw. Contact Dermatitis 24:310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Deutman R, Mulder TJ, Brian R, Nater JP (1977) Metal sensitivity before and after total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:862–865

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hallab NJ, Caicedo M, Finnegan A, Jacobs JJ (2008) Th1 type lymphocyte reactivity to metals in patients with total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 3:6

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carulli C, Villano M, Bucciarelli G, Martini C, Innocenti M (2011) Painful knee arthroplasty: definition and overview. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 8:23–25

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Villano M, Carulli C, Puccini S, Soderi S, Innocenti M (2011) Painful knee arthroplasty: surgical approach. Clin Case Bone Miner Metab 8:26–28

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hallab NJ, Jacobs JJ (2009) Biologic effects of implant debris. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 67:182–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, Flury R, Windler M, Köster G, Lohmann CH (2005) Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:28–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobs JJ, Hallab NJ (2006) Loosening and osteolysis associated with metal-on-metal bearings: a local effect of metal hypersensitivity? J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1171–1172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McKenzie AW, Aitken CV, Ridsdill-Smith R (1967) Urticaria after insertion of Smith-Petersen Vitallium nail. Br Med J 5570:36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thienpont E, Berger Y (2013) No allergic reaction after TKA in a chrome-cobalt-nickel-sensitive patient: case report and review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:636–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ (2009) Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2606–2612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Keeney JA, Eunice S, Pashos G, Wright RW, Clohisy JC (2011) What is the evidence for total knee arthroplasty in young patients? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:574–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Merritt K, Rodrigo JJ (1996) Immune response to synthetic materials. Sensitization of patients receiving orthopaedic implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 326:71–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Innocenti M, Civinini R, Carulli C, Villano M, Linari S, Morfini M (2007) A modular total knee arthroplasty in haemophilic arthropathy. Knee 14:264–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Majima T, Yasuda K, Tago H, Aoki Y, Minami A (2008) Clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament retaining TKA with alumina ceramic condylar prosthesis: comparison to Co-Cr alloy prosthesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:152–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Innocenti M, Civinini R, Carulli C, Matassi F, Villano M (2010) The 5-year results of an oxidized zirconium femoral component for TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:1258–1263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Iida T, Minoda Y, Kadoya Y, Matsui Y, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H, Ikebuchi M, Yoshida T, Nakamura H (2012) Mid-term clinical results of alumina medial pivot total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1514–1519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hallab NJ, Mikecz K, Jacobs JJ (2000) A triple assay technique for the evaluation of metal-induced, delayed-type hypersensitivity responses in patients with or receiving total joint arthroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res 53:480–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Everness KM, Gawkrodger DJ, Botham PA, Hunter JA (1990) The discrimination between nickel-sensitive and non-nickel-sensitive subjects by an in vitro lymphocyte transformation test. Br J Dermat 122:293–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hallab NJ, Caicedo M, Epstein R, McAllister K, Jacobs JJ (2010) In vitro reactivity to implant metals demonstrates a person-dependent association with both T-cell and B-cell activation. J Biomed Mater Res 92:667–682

    Google Scholar 

  26. White SE, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, Anthony M, Poggie RA (1994) Simulated knee wear with cobalt chromium and oxidized zirconium knee femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:176–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ries MD, Salehi A, Widding K, Hunter G (2002) Polyethylene wear performance of oxidized zirconium and cobalt-chromium knee components under abrasive conditions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(suppl 2):129–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hernigou P, Nogier A, Manicom O, Poignard A, De Abreu L, Filippini P (2004) Alternative femoral bearing surface options for knee replacement in young patients. Knee 11:169–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Norgren B, Dalén T, Nilsson KG (2004) All-poly tibial component better than metal-backed: a randomized RSA study. Knee 11:189–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dojcinovic S, Ait Si Selmi T, Servien E, Verdonk PC, Neyret P (2007) A comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 93:364–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Browne JA, Gall Sims SE, Giuseffi SA, Trousdale RT (2011) All-polyethylene tibial components in modern total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19:527–535

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nouta KA, Verra WC, Pijls BG, Schoones JW, Nelissen RG (2012) All-polyethylene tibial components are equal to metal-backed components: systematic review and meta-regression. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3549–3559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang J, Merritt K (1994) Detection of antibodies against corrosion products in patients after Co-Cr total joint replacements. Biomed Mater Res 28:1249–1258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors state that they had no funding or any conflict of interests, which may have produced a bias in the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Carulli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Innocenti, M., Carulli, C., Matassi, F. et al. Total knee arthroplasty in patients with hypersensitivity to metals. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 38, 329–333 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2229-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2229-2

Keywords

Navigation