Skip to main content
Log in

Risk stratification models fail to predict hospital costs of cardiac surgery patients

Präoperative Risikoscores können die Kosten in der Herzchirurgie nicht vorhersagen

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Kardiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Das Ziel dieser prospektiven Studie war festzustellen, ob präoperative Risikoscores die Gesamtkosten in der Herzchirurgie vorhersagen können.

Methoden

Zwischen dem 1. Oktober und 31. Dezember 2003 wurden alle konsekutiven erwachsenen Patienten, die sich einem herzchirurgischen Eingriff mit Herz-Lungenmaschine unterzogen, mittels sieben verschiedener Risikostratifizierungsmodelle klassifiziert: EuroSCORE, Cleveland, Parsonnet, Ontario, French, Pons und CABDEAL. Die Gesamtkosten des Krankenhauses wurden für jeden Patienten täglich prospektiv berechnet. In die Analyse wurden Kosten der präoperativen Diagnostik, der operativen Prozedur, der Verbrauchsmaterialien, der Medikamente, der Blutprodukte, der Personalkosten und die Fixkosten des Krankenhauses nach Angaben des Kalkulationshandbuches Version 2,0 mit eingerechnet. Die Korrelation zwischen den erreichten Scorepunkten und den entstandenen Kosten erfolgte mit den Korrelationskoeffizienten nach Spearman. Die Erlöse aller Patienten wurden mit ihren Zu- und Abschlägen für das Jahr 2003 ermittelt.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt wurden 252 erwachsene Patienten mit Herz-Lungenmaschine operiert. Davon erhielten 175 Patienten eine Bypassoperation, 39 Patienten eine Klappenoperation, 21 Patienten eine kombinierte Bypass- und Klappenoperation, 13 Patienten eine Operation an der thorakalen Aorta. Außerdem wurden 2 Patienten wegen eines Myxoms, 1 Patient wegen eines Vorhofseptumdefekts und 1 Patient wegen einer fulminanten Lungenembolie operiert. Das mittlere Alter der Patienten lag bei 66,0±11,4 Jahre, 29,4% der Patienten waren weiblich. Die Intensivliegedauer lag bei 3,3±6,3 Tagen, und die 30-Tageletalität lag bei 6,7%. Die Korrelationskoeffizienten zwischen den 7 Risikomodellen und den Klinikkosten war mit einem r<0,33 (p=0,0001) sehr niedrig. Eine deutliche Korrelation r=0,94 (p=0,0001) konnte jedoch zwischen der Intensivverweildauer und Kosten ermittelt werden.

Schlussfolgerung

Die Krankenhauskosten können mit der Länge des Intensivaufenthaltes gut prognostiziert werden. Eine Kostenprognose war jedoch mit keinem Risikomodell möglich.

Summary

Background

The aim of this prospective study was to determine if commonly used risk stratification models can predict total hospital costs in cardiac surgical patients.

Methods

Between October 1st and December 31st 2003, all consecutive adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery on CPB at our institution were classified using seven risk stratification scoring systems: EuroSCORE, Cleveland, Parsonnet, Ontario, French, Pons, and CABDEAL. Total hospital costs for each patient were calculated on a daily basis including preoperative diagnostic tests, operating room costs, disposable materials, drugs, blood components, costs for personnel, and hospital fixed-costs. Linear regression analysis was used to determine the correlation between costs and the seven risk stratifications models as well as length of stay (LOS) on ICU. The Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated from the regression line, and an analysis of residuals was performed to determine the quality of the regression.

Results

A total of 252 patients were operated for CABG (n=175), valve (n=39), CABG plus valve (n=21), thoracic aorta (n=13) and miscellaneous (2 myxoma, 1 ASD, 1 pulmonary embolism). Mean age of the patients was 66.0±11.4 years, 29.4% were female. LOS on ICU was 3.3±6.3 days and the 30-day mortality rate was 6.7%. Spearman correlation between the seven risk stratification models and hospital costs was below r=0.32 (p=0.0001), but was r=0.94 (p=0.0001) between ICU LOS and costs.

Conclusions

Total hospital costs can be identified by length of ICU stay. None of the common risk stratification models accurately predicted total hospital costs in cardiac surgical patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Geissler HJ, Holzl P, Marohl S, et al (2000) Risk stratification in heart surgery: comparison of six score systems. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17(4):400–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haehnel JC, Roth P, Lohmann E, Meisner H, Hehrlein FW (1996) Implications of the introduction of fixed reimbursement rates in Germany. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 44(2):97–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kurki TS, Hakkinen U, Lauharanta J, Ramo J, Leijala M (2001) Evaluation of the relationship between preoperative risk scores, postoperative and total length of stays and hospital costs in coronary bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 20(6):1183–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kurki TS, Kataja MJ, Reich DL (2002) Validation of a preoperative risk index as a predictor of perioperative morbidity and hospital costs in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 16(4):401–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sokolovic E, Schmidlin D, Schmid ER, et al (2002) Determinants of costs and resource utilization associated with open heart surgery. Eur Heart J 23(7):574–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pinna Pintor P, Bobbio M, Colangelo S, et al. (2003) Can EuroSCORE predict direct costs of cardiac surgery? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23(4):595–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nilsson J, Algotsson L, Höglund P, Lührs C, Brandt J (2004) EuroSCORE Predicts Intensive Care Unit Stay and Costs of Open Heart Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 78:1528–1535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P, et al (1999) Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15(6):816–822; discussion 822–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Higgins TL, Estafanous FG, Loop FD, et al (1992) Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients. A clinical severity score. JAMA 267(17):2344–2348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parsonnet V, Dean D, Bernstein AD (1989) A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease. Circulation 79(6Pt 2):I3–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tu JV, Jaglal SB, Naylor CD (1995) Multicenter validation of a risk index for mortality, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery. Steering Committee of the Provincial Adult Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. Circulation 91(3):677–684

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roques F, Gabrielle F, Michel P, et al (1995) Quality of care in adult heart surgery: proposal for a self-assessment approach based on a French multicenter study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 9(8):433–439; discussion 439–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pons JM, Granados A, Espinas JA, et al (1997) Assessing open heart surgery mortality in Catalonia (Spain) through a predictive risk model. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 11(3):415–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurki TS, Kataja M (1996) Preoperative prediction of postoperative morbidity in coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 61(6):1740–1745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S (1997) A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med 16(9):965–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanley JA, Hajian-Tilaki KO (1997) Sampling variability of nonparametric estimates of the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves: an update. Acad Radiol 4(1):49–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bühl A, Zöfel P (2000) SPSS Version 10. 7 ed. Addison Wesley, München, pp 319–332

  18. Ferraris VA (2004) Invited commentary. Ann Thorac Surg 78(5):1534–1535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Edbrooke D, Nightingale P (1998) Relationship between TISS and costs in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 24(10):995–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferraris VA, Ferraris SP, Singh A (1998) Operative outcome and hospital cost. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115(3):593–602; discussion 602–603

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Riordan CJ, Engoren M, Zacharias A, et al (2000) Resource utilization in coronary artery bypass operation: does surgical risk predict cost? Ann Thorac Surg 69(4):1092–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al (1999) European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (Euro-SCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16(1):9–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kurki TS, Jarvinen O, Kataja MJ, Laurikka J, Tarkka M (2002) Performance of three preoperative risk indices; CABDEAL, EuroSCORE and Cleveland models in a prospective coronary bypass database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 21(3):406–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Hekmat.

Additional information

Presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 13–16 February 2005, Hamburg, Germany

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hekmat, K., Raabe, A., Kroener, A. et al. Risk stratification models fail to predict hospital costs of cardiac surgery patients. ZS Kardiologie 94, 748–753 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-005-0300-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-005-0300-8

Schlüsselwörter

Key words

Navigation