Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA) is claimed to be superior to the standard technique, due to the potential reduction of soft tissue damage via a smaller and tissue-sparing approach. As a result of the lack of objective evidence of fewer muscle and tendon defects, controversy still remains as to whether minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty truly minimizes muscle and tendon damage. Therefore, the objective was to compare the influence of the surgical approach on abductor muscle trauma and to analyze the relevance to postoperative pain and functional recovery.

Materials and methods

Between June 2006 and July 2007, 44 patients with primary hip arthritis were prospectively included in the study protocol. Patients underwent cementless unilateral total hip arthroplasty either through a minimally invasive anterolateral approach (ALMI) (n = 21) or a modified direct lateral approach (mDL) (n = 16). Patients were evaluated clinically and underwent MR imaging preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Clinical assessment contained clinical examination, performance of abduction test and the survey of a function score using the Harris Hip Score, a pain score using a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0–10, as well as a satisfaction score using an NRS of 1–6. Additionally, myoglobin and creatine kinase were measured preoperatively, and 6, 24 and 96 h postoperatively. Evaluation of the MRI images included fatty atrophy (rating scale 0–4), tendon defects (present/absent) and bursal fluid collection of the abductor muscle.

Results

Muscle and tendon damage occurred in both groups, but more lateral gluteus medius tendon defects [mDL 3/12mth.: 6 (37%)/4 (25%); ALMI: 3 (14%)/2 (9%)] and muscle atrophy in the anterior part of the gluteus medius [mean-standard (12): 1.75 ± 1.8; mean-MIS (12): 0.98 ± 1.1] were found in patients with the mDL approach. The clinical outcome was also poorer compared to the ALMI group. Significantly, more Trendelenburg’s signs were evident and lower clinical scores were achieved in the mDL group. No differences in muscle and tendon damage were found for the gluteus minimus muscle. A higher serum myoglobin concentration was measured 6 and 24 h postoperatively in the mDL group (6 h: 403 ± 168 μg/l; 24 h: 304 ± 182 μg/l) compared to the ALMI group (6 h: 331 ± 143 μg/l; 24 h: 268 ± 145 μg/l).

Conclusion

Abductor muscle and tendon damage occurred in both approaches, but the gluteus medius muscle can be spared more successfully via the minimally invasive approach and is accompanied by a better clinical outcome. Therefore, going through the intermuscular plane, without any detachment or dissection of muscle and tendons, truly minimizes perioperative soft tissue trauma. Furthermore, MRI emerges as an important imaging modality in the evaluation of muscle trauma in THA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker AS, Bitounis VC (1989) Abductor function after total hip replacement. An electromyographic and clinical review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:47–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S et al (1979) The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery 95:47–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger RA (2004) The technique of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using the two-incision approach. Instr Course Lect 53:149–155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger RA (2003) Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin orthopaed Relat Res:232–241

  5. Bernasek TL, Lee WS, Lee HJ et al (2010) Minimally invasive primary THA: anterolateral intermuscular approach versus lateral transmuscular approach. Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery

  6. Berry DJ (2005) “Minimally invasive” total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 87:699–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ et al (2003) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Development, early results, and a critical analysis. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Association, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, June 14, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg 85-A:2235–2246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bertin KC, Rottinger H (2004) Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Rel Res:248–255

  9. Bos JC, Stoeckart R, Klooswijk AI et al (1994) The surgical anatomy of the superior gluteal nerve and anatomical radiologic bases of the direct lateral approach to the hip. Surg Radiol Anat 16:253–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chimento GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N et al (2005) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 20:139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen RG, Katz JA, Skrepnik NV (2009) The relationship between skeletal muscle serum markers and primary THA: a pilot study. Clin Orthopaed Rel Res 467:1747–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Comstock C, Imrie S, Goodman SB (1994) A clinical and radiographic study of the “safe area” using the direct lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 9:527–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Digioia AM 3rd, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ et al (2003) Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty 18:123–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J et al. (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Related Res:78–83

  15. Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64:17–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hungerford DS (2004) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: in opposition. J Arthroplasty 19:81–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kenny P, O’brien CP, Synnott K et al (1999) Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after two different approaches to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 81:979–981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Laffosse JM, Chiron P, Molinier F et al (2007) Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement. Early results. Int Orthop 31:597–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mardones R, Pagnano MW, Nemanich JP et al (2005) The Frank Stinchfield Award: muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop Rel Res 441:63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Meneghini RM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT et al (2006) Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Rel Res 453:293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mow CS, Woolson ST, Ngarmukos SG et al (2005) Comparison of scars from total hip replacements done with a standard or a mini-incision. Clin Orthop Rel Res 441:80–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Muller M, Tohtz S, Winkler T et al (2010) MRI findings of gluteus minimus muscle damage in primary total hip arthroplasty and the influence on clinical outcome. Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery

  24. Nakamura S, Matsuda K, Arai N et al (2004) Mini-incision posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 28:214–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. O’brien DA, Rorabeck CH (2005) The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Related Res 441:99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P et al (2005) A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg 87:701–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peck CN, Foster A, Mclauchlan GJ (2006) Reducing incision length or intensifying rehabilitation: what makes the difference to length of stay in total hip replacement in a UK setting? Int Orthop 30:395–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pfirrmann CW, Notzli HP, Dora C et al (2005) Abductor tendons and muscles assessed at MR imaging after total hip arthroplasty in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Radiology 235:969–976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Picado CH, Garcia FL, Marques W Jr (2007) Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after direct lateral approach to the hip. Clin Orthop Rel Res 455:209–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Potter HG, Foo LF, Nestor BJ (2005) What is the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasty? HSS J 1:89–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Roth A, Layher F, Venbrocks RA (2006) Transgluteal mini-incision. Technique and our own results. Der Orthopade 35(744):746–750

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sculco TP (2003) Is smaller necessarily better? American journal of orthopedics Belle Mead, NJ, 32:169

  33. Svensson O, Skold S, Blomgren G (1990) Integrity of the gluteus medius after the transgluteal approach in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 5:57–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF et al (2004) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A:1353–1358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wright JM, Crockett HC, Delgado S et al (2004) Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 19:538–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Müller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, M., Tohtz, S., Springer, I. et al. Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131, 179–189 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1117-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1117-0

Keywords

Navigation