Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors of outcome after obesity surgery in New York state from 1991 to 2003

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to examine hospital volume in New York state as a predictor of complications over 13 years.

Methods

Data from the New York state Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative Systems database were analyzed by diagnosis-related group, patient demographics, and outcomes. The institution data were analyzed on the basis of volume and logistic regression using chi-square analysis for predicting morbidity and mortality.

Results

From 1991 to 2003, 24,534 patients underwent bariatric surgery at 79 institutions. Case volume increased 36-fold in high-volume centers (HVCs), whereas the overall number of institutions doubled. The average mortality rate was 1.1% in low-volume centers (LVCs), 0.4% in medium-volume centers (MVCs), and 0.2% in HVCs. Whereas 12.4% of the LVC patients had postoperative anastomotic complications (PACs), only 9.7% had PACs in MVCs and only 7.3% had PACs in HVCs (p < 0.05). Furthermore, only 0.7% of the patients required postoperative reintubation (PRI) after surgery at HVCs, as compared with 1.5% at MVCs and 1.8% at LVCs (p < 0.05). Finally, 1.8% of the patients required blood transfusion of packed red blood cells at HVCs, whereas 2.4% required transfusion at MVCs and LVCs.

Conclusions

Experience correlates with fewer postoperative complications, including death, in bariatric centers in New York state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Betsy Lehman Center for Patient Safety and Medical Error Reduction (2004, August 4) Expert panel on weight loss surgery. Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston

  2. Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity Among Adults: United States, 1999–2002. Retrieved on 6/2/06 at http://nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/obese/obse99.htm/

  3. Courcoulas A, Schuchert M, Gatti G, Luketich J (2003) The relationship of surgeon and hospital volume to outcome after gastric bypass surgery in Pennsylvania: a 3-year summary. Surgery 134: 613–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DeMaria EJ, Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, Meador JG, Wolfe LG (2002) Results of 281 consecutive total laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity. Ann Surg 235: 640–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL (2002) Prevalence and trends in obesity among U.S. adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 288: 1723–1727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Hossain M, Soybel D, Kizer KW, Aust JB, Bell RH Jr., Chong V, Demakis J, Fabri PJ, Gibbs JD, Grover F, Hammermeister K, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr., Phillips L, Scamman F, Spencer J, Stremple JF (1999) Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 230: 414–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu JH, Zingmond D, Etzioni DA, O'Connell JB, Maggard MA, Livingston EH, Liu CD, Ko CY (2003) Characterizing the performance and outcomes of obesity surgery in California. Am Surg 69: 823–828

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagle AP, Prystowsky JB (2004) Surgical management of obesity. Clin Obset Gynecol 47: 928–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, Arango A, Cole CJ, Lee SJ, Wolfe BM (2001) Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcome, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 234: 279–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen NT, Lee SL, Goldman C, Fleming N, Arango A, McFall R, Wolfe BM (2001) Comparison of pulmonary function and postoperative pain after laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 192: 469–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen NT, Paya M, Stevens CM, Mavandadi S, Zainabadi K, Wilson SE (2004) The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Ann Surg 240: 586–594

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen NT, Root J, Zainabadi K, Sabio A, Chalifoux S, Stevens CM, Mavandadi S, Longoria M, Wilson SE (2005) Accelerated growth of bariatric surgery with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery. Arch Surg 140: 1198–1202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pope GD, Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR (2002) National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of bariatric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 6: 855–861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Hamad G, Gourash W (2003) The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in 100 cases. Surg Endosc 17: 212–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bariatric Surgery Center of Excellence Requirements. Retrieved 6/2/06 at http://www.surgicalreview.org/requirements.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kaul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parker, M., Loewen, M., Sullivan, T. et al. Predictors of outcome after obesity surgery in New York state from 1991 to 2003. Surg Endosc 21, 1482–1486 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9245-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9245-5

Keywords

Navigation