Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is not routinely performed for appendicitis because the costs associated with that procedure are higher than those for open appendectomy (OA). However, few studies have investigated the economic influence of LA and OA on specific subpopulations including the elderly, patients with comorbidities, and patients with complicated appendicitis. This population-based study was designed to investigate determinants of costs and hospital length of stay (LOS) for patients undergoing appendectomy. Furthermore, the differences in costs and LOS were compared between LA and OA for various subpopulations.
Methods
Inpatients who underwent LA or OA for appendicitis during the period 2001–2008 were identified from claims data obtained from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance program. Costs and LOS were evaluated by multiple linear regression models for various subpopulations stratified according to age, number of comorbidities, and severity of appendicitis.
Results
Between 2001 and 2008, 22,252 patients (13.3%) underwent LA and 14,4438 (86.7%) had OA. Age, comorbidity, and severity of appendicitis were determinants of costs and LOS for both LA and OA. Although the costs and LOS for appendectomy increased with age and number of comorbidities, a sharper increase was noted for OA patients. Laparoscopic appendectomy mildly decreased LOS at the expense of significantly higher costs for young patients, those without comorbidities, and patients with uncomplicated appendicitis. In contrast, compared with OA, LA was associated with comparable costs and reduced LOS for the elderly, patients with comorbidities, and those with complicated appendicitis. In addition, hospital mortality and readmission rates for postoperative complications did not differ significantly between LA and OA.
Conclusion
Considering costs and LOS, patients older than 65 years, patients with comorbidities, and patients with complicated appendicitis benefit more from the laparoscopic approach for the treatment of appendicitis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ohmann C, Franke C, Kraemer M, Yang Q (2002) Status report on epidemiology of acute appendicitis. Chirurg 73:769–776
Semm K (1983) Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 15:59–64
Varela JE, Hinojosa MW, Nguyen NT (2008) Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg 196:218–222
Garbarino S, Shimi SM (2009) Routine diagnostic laparoscopy reduces the rate of unnecessary appendicectomies in young women. Surg Endosc 23:527–533
Schroder DM, Lathrop JC, Lloyd LR, Boccaccio JE, Hawasli A (1993) Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: is there really any benefit? Am Surg 59:541–547 discussion 7–8
Vallina VL, Velasco JM, McCulloch CS (1993) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Ann Surg 218:685–692
Kurtz RJ, Heimann TM (2001) Comparison of open and laparoscopic treatment of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 182:211–214
Marzouk M, Khater M, Elsadek M, Abdelmoghny A (2003) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective comparative study of 227 patients. Surg Endosc 17:721–724
Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH, Wei B, Zheng F, Qiu WS, Guo WP, Chen TF, Wang TB (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endosc 24:266–269
Sporn E, Petroski GF, Mancini GJ, Astudillo JA, Miedema BW, Thaler K (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the U.S. from 2000 to 2005. J Am Coll Surg 208:179e2–185e2
Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Helgeson ER, Harmsen WS, Smith CD, Ilstrup DM, Baerga-Varela Y, Sarr MG (2001) A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery 129:390–400
Johnson AB, Peetz ME (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 12:940–943
Harrell AG, Lincourt AE, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ, Kuwada TS, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2006) Advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Am Surg 72:474–480
Cothren CC, Moore EE, Johnson JL, Moore JB, Ciesla DJ, Burch JM (2005) Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital? Am J Surg 190:950–954
Chiang TL (1997) Taiwan’s 1995 health care reform. Health Policy 39:225–239
Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383
Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925
Paranjape C, Dalia S, Pan J, Horattas M (2007) Appendicitis in the elderly: a change in the laparoscopic era. Surg Endosc 21:777–781
Kirshtein B, Perry ZH, Mizrahi S, Lantsberg L (2009) Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly patient. World J Surg 33:918–922
Guller U, Jain N, Peterson ED, Muhlbaier LH, Eubanks S, Pietrobon R (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Surgery 135:479–488
Marudanayagam R, Williams GT, Rees BI (2006) Review of the pathological results of 2, 660 appendicectomy specimens. J Gastroenterol 41:745–749
Lau WY, Fan ST, Yiu TF, Chu KW, Lee JM (1985) Acute appendicitis in the elderly. Surg Gynecol Obstet 161:157–160
Podnos YD, Jimenez JC, Wilson SE (2002) Intraabdominal sepsis in elderly persons. Clin Infect Dis 35:62–68
Reddy K, Yusuf S (1998) Emerging epidemic of cardiovascular disease in developing countries. Circulation 97:596
Zimmet P (2000) Globalization, coca-colonization, and the chronic disease epidemic: can the Doomsday scenario be averted? J Intern Med 247:301–310
Yau KK, Siu WT, Tang CN, Yang GP, Li MK (2007) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 205:60–65
Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:200–205
Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL, Bassin A, Breslaw R, McKenney MG, Ginzburg E, Sleeman D (1995) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg 222:256–261 discussion 61–62
Buckley RC, Hall TJ, Muakkassa FF, Anglin B, Rhodes RS, Scott-Conner CE (1994) Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worth it? Am Surg 60:30–34
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Sciences Council, Executive Yuan (grant numbers NSC 99-2621-M-039-001), China Medical University Hospital (grant number 1MS1), Taiwan Department of Health Clinical Trial and Research Center for Excellence (grant number DOH100-TD-B-111-004) and Taiwan Department of Health Cancer Research Center of Excellence (DOH100-TD-C-111-005).
Disclosures
Chun-Chieh Yeh, Shih-Chi Wu, Chien-Chang Liao, Li-Ting Su, Chi-Hsun Hsieh, and Tsai-Chung Li have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yeh, CC., Wu, SC., Liao, CC. et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is more favorable for patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and those with complicated appendicitis: a nationwide population-based study. Surg Endosc 25, 2932–2942 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1645-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1645-x