Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Monopolar Electrocoagulation, Bipolar Electrocoagulation, Ultracision, and Ligasure

  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Hemostasis is a fundamental principle of surgery. We compared the safety and efficacy of monopolar electrocoagulation (ME), bipolar electrocoagulation (BE), Ligasure (LS), a modern bipolar vessel sealing system, and Ultracision (UC), a system of ultrasound energy based shears. We also studied the healing process after their use.

Methods

We used each of the above methods to coagulate and divide the short gastric vessels of 16 white male New Zealand rabbits. The animals were killed after 3, 7, 14, or 21 days, and the coagulation sites and the adjacent gastric wall were examined histologically.

Results

LS and UC achieved complete hemostasis without any complications. Conversely, ME and BE often resulted in failed coagulation and perforation of the neighboring gastric wall from a side thermal injury. Histologically, LS demonstrated the mildest side thermal injury and the fastest healing process. We noted greater thermal injury and inflammatory response after UC than after LS on days 7 and 14; however, ME and BE caused the most severe lesions.

Conclusions

LS and UC are clearly the safest and most efficient methods of coagulation, whereas ME and BE could cause serious clinical and histological complications. We found histological evidence that UC causes a slightly greater inflammatory response than LS, and the clinical implications of this warrant further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BD Matthews BL Pratt CL Backus KW Kercher G Mostafa A Lentzner et al. (2001) ArticleTitleEffectiveness of the ultrasonic coagulating shears, Ligasure vessel sealer and surgical clip application in biliary surgery: a comparative analysis Am Surg 67 901–6 Occurrence Handle11565773 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrhvFWjtw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. T Higami A Maruo T Yamashita T Shida K Ogawa (2000) ArticleTitleHistologic and physiologic evaluation of sceletonized internal thoracic artery harvesting with an ultrasonic scalpel J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 120 1142–7 Occurrence Handle11088039 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FntF2mtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1067/mtc.2000.110189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. JS Kennedy PL Stranahan KD Taylor JG Chandler (1998) ArticleTitleHigh-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing Surg Endosc 12 876–8 Occurrence Handle9602010 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3mslegsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A Shamiyeh P Schrenk L Tulipan P Vattay S Bogner W Wayand (2002) ArticleTitleA new bipolar feedback-controlled sealing system for closure of the cystic duct and artery Surg Endosc 16 812–3 Occurrence Handle11997828 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383lvVahsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-9058-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S Sengupta DR Webb (2001) ArticleTitleUse of a computer-controlled bipolar diathermy in radical prostatectomies and other open urological surgery Aust NZ J Surg 71 538–40 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvosFWnsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02186.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. F Romano R Caprotti C Franciosi S Fina G Colombo F Uggeri (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic splenectomy using ligasure Surg Endosc 16 1608–11 Occurrence Handle11984666 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38notlGjsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-9145-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. T Uno T Kazui BAH Muhammad (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic surgery for gonadal dysgenesis in children Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9 151–5 Occurrence Handle11757545 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FjtFyqtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1097/00019509-199904000-00015

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. T Ohtsuka S Takamoto M Endoh Y Kotsuka T Oka (2000) ArticleTitleUltrasonic coagulator for video-assisted internal mammary artery harvest Surg Endosc 14 82–5 Occurrence Handle10653244 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7hs12ntw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. FF Palazzo DL Francis MA Clifton (2002) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 89 154–7 Occurrence Handle11856126 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387isV2isg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. CGS Hüscher MM Lirici A Anastasi A Sansonetti M Amini (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy by harmonic dissection Surg Endosc 13 1256–7 Occurrence Handle10594282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. S Schulze VB Krisitiansen B Fischer Hansen J Rosenberg (2001) ArticleTitleSealing of cystic duct with bipolar electrocoagulation Surg Endosc 16 342–4 Occurrence Handle11967693 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640090054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. BT Heniford BD Matthews RF Sing C Backus B Pratt FL Greene (2001) ArticleTitleInitial results with an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer Surg Endosc 15 799–801 Occurrence Handle11443443 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrksFSjtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080025

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. WS Laycock TL Trus JG Hunter (1996) ArticleTitleNew technology for the division of short gastric vessels during laparoscopic Niessen fundoplication Surg Endosc 10 71–3 Occurrence Handle8711613 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283mtlOqsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649910019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. PG Horgan (2001) ArticleTitleA novel technique for parenchymal division during hepatectomy Am J Surg 181 236–7 Occurrence Handle11376578 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ps1ektA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00556-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. LA Ronan JW Perry HB Barner TM Sundt Suffix3rd (2000) ArticleTitleRadial artery harvest: comparison of ultrasonic dissection with standard technique Ann Thorac Surg 69 113–4 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0003-4975(99)01193-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R Hand P Rakestraw T Taylor (2002) ArticleTitleEvaluation of a vessel sealing device for use in laparoscopic ovariectomy in mares Vet Surg 31 240–4 Occurrence Handle11994851 Occurrence Handle10.1053/jvet.2002.33482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. DG Jayne I Botterill NS Ambrose TG Brennan PJ Guillou DS O'Riordain (2002) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus conventional diathermy for day-case haemorrhoidectomy Br J Surg 89 428–32 Occurrence Handle11952582 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383hs1Kruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.0007-1323.2002.02056.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. JH Johnston DM Jensen W Mautner (1982) ArticleTitleComparison of endoscopic electrocoagulation and laser photocoagulation of bleeding canine gastric ulcers Gastroenterology 82 904–10 Occurrence Handle7060912 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL387jvF2kug%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Y Otani M Ohgami M Kitajima (1999) ArticleTitleHaemostatic dissection devices: today's clinical experience and future options Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 8 68–72 Occurrence Handle10.3109/13645709909153136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. JC Lantis SuffixII FM Durville R Connolly SD Schwaitzberg (1998) ArticleTitleComparison of coagulation modalities in surgery J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 8 381–94 Occurrence Handle9916591

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. A Kwok D Nevell A Ferrier N Graf A Lam R Ford (2001) ArticleTitleComparison of tissue injury between laparosonic coagulating shears and electrosurgical scissors in the sheep model J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8 378–84 Occurrence Handle11509777 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvmsVKgsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60334-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. AM Davidoff TN Pappas EA Murray DJ Hilleren RD Johnson ME Baker et al. (1992) ArticleTitleMechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecyctectomy Ann Surg 215 196–202 Occurrence Handle1531913 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK387otFagtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199203000-00002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. CR Voyles RD Tucker (1994) ArticleTitleUnrecognized hazards of surgical electrodes passed through metal suction-irrigation devices Surg Endosc 8 185–7 Occurrence Handle8191356 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c3kvVyhtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00591827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. AH Ata TJ Bellemore JA Meisel SM Arambulo (1993) ArticleTitleDistal thermal injury from monopolar electrosurgery Surg Laparosc Endosc 3 323–7 Occurrence Handle8269253 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FpsVSmsw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. HH Reidel G Corts-Kleinwort K Semm (1984) ArticleTitleVarious coagulation techniques tested in a rabbit model Endoscopy 16 47–52 Occurrence Handle10.1055/s-2007-1018531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. DW Birch A Park H Shuhaibar (1999) ArticleTitleAcute thermal injury to the canine jejunal free flap: electrocautery versus ultrasonic dissection Am Surg 65 334–7 Occurrence Handle10190358 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3gsVKgsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. R Hambley P Hebda E Abell BA Cohen BV Jegasothy (1998) ArticleTitleWound healing of skin incisions produced by ultrasonically vibrating knife, scalpel, electrosurgery and carbon dioxide laser J Dermatol Surg Oncol 14 1213–7

    Google Scholar 

  28. SL Goldstein KL Harold A Lentzner BD Matthews KW Kercher RF Sing et al. (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of thermal spread after ureteral ligation with the laparosonic ultrasonic shears and the Ligasure system J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12 61–3 Occurrence Handle11905864 Occurrence Handle10.1089/109264202753486957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. JS Kennedy PL Stranahan KD Taylor JG Chandler (1998) ArticleTitleHigh-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing Surg Endosc 12 876–8 Occurrence Handle9602010 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3mslegsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. DM Hoeing CA Chrostec JF Amaral (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic coagulation shears: alternative methods of hemostatic control of unsupported tissue J Endourol 10 431–3 Occurrence Handle10.1089/end.1996.10.431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. M Kusunoki Y Shoji H Yanagi T Yamamura (1999) ArticleTitleTransanal mucosectomy using an ultrasonically activated scalpel for ulcerative colitis Surg Today 29 392–4 Occurrence Handle10211579 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3is1Glsw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. TA Emam A Cuschieri (2003) ArticleTitleHow safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection? Ann Surg 237 186–91 Occurrence Handle12560776 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200302000-00007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diamantis, T., Kontos, M., Arvelakis, A. et al. Comparison of Monopolar Electrocoagulation, Bipolar Electrocoagulation, Ultracision, and Ligasure. Surg Today 36, 908–913 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-006-3254-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-006-3254-1

Key words

Navigation