The prehospital phase of acute myocardial infarction in the era of thrombolysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(90)91345-7Get rights and content

Abstract

To evaluate the factors affecting the time between symptom onset and hospital arrival in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), we gave a detailed questionnaire to all who were admitted or transferred with AMI from January 1988 to February 1989. In these 126 patients (94 men, 32 women) the mean prehospital time was S.9 ± 11.0 hours (median 2.0, range 0.4 to 69.0). The time between symptom onset and reaching a decision that medical care should be sought was 62% of the mean prehospital time. In 100 (79%) patients, the prehospital time was ≤6 hours; of these, 61 (61%) were retrospectively judged to have been optimal candidates for lytic therapy. Stepwise multiple regression selected the following 4 variables as independent predictors of prehospital time: slow symptom progression; low income; female gender; and advanced age. All of these variables are predictive (p <0.03) of increased prehospital time; absence of prior AMI was of borderline additional significance (p = 0.053). Similarly, logistic regression analysis selected slow symptom progression, female gender and low income as significant (p ≤50.02) independent predictors of prehospital time >6 hours. The logistic regression model incorporating these 3 variables had a sensitivity of S4%, a specificity of 95% and a positive predictive value of 72% in identifying patients with prehospital time >6 hours. Thus, these data indicate it is possible to characterize patients likely to experience undue prehospital delay during AMI, which may be of importance to future public education efforts.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (105)

  • Multiple Cardiac Biomarkers Used in Clinical Guideline for Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

    2017, International Journal of Gerontology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The mortality rate for heart disease is higher in elderly patients compared with younger ones.2,3 Elderly patients with myocardial infarctions (MI) are frequently treated too late.4,5 Research shows that 29.4% of patients aged 65 and over with MI do not receive treatment until 6 h after the emergence of symptoms.6

  • Epidemiology, Aetiology, Risk of Rupture and Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Does Sex Matter?

    2009, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    By the time they develop an AAA they have often survived their spouse and may choose not to be operated on. There is also evidence that, as in the case of myocardial infarction (MI), women delay seeking medical attention.59 A reduced awareness of AAA in women, both in the women themselves and their doctors, as well as gender bias, both of which may result in diagnostic and surgical delay probably also play a role.

  • The effect of health care provider consultation on acute coronary syndrome care-seeking delay

    2007, Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care
    Citation Excerpt :

    Of the few studies reporting a time interval for physician evaluation, Rawles and Haites23 observed a 15-minute median MEP, Hejl and colleagues18 reported a median MEP of 30 minutes, and Schroeder and colleagues55 reported a median of 38 minutes; the latter two times are consistent with the 29.7-minute median phase duration reported here. Schmidt and Borsch56 report that independently of the time taken to make the call to the office, time spent in the physician's office, waiting for the appointment (if necessary), or traveling to the office averaged 45 minutes (±22 minutes). During the course of their medical evaluation, patients in this study were also asked to wait: to come to the HCP's office, for a physician HCP to return their call, or before going to the ED or hospital.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text