Clinical surgery-AmericanSurgical time independently affected by surgical team size
Section snippets
Procedures
A retrospective case review was completed on all general laparoscopic procedures that were preformed by the senior author (L.L.S.) between July 2005 and July 2007. Procedures were performed in 3 ORs designed for minimally invasive surgical procedures. Ethical approval was obtained from the Internal Review Boards at Legacy Health System (FWA00001280) and Providence Portland Medical Center (07 A–88 A).
Data collection
From the intraoperative nursing records we recorded surgeons, surgeon assistants,
Results
A total of 399 cases were reviewed retrospectively. Laparoscopic procedures performed included cholecystectomy, hernia repair, various surgical procedures for gastroesophageal reflux disease, bariatric procedures, esophagectomy, and other general surgery procedures. Thirty-nine procedures were deleted from the analysis because of incomplete surgical records, such as missing procedure time, OR staff, or lack of OR report. The analysis was performed on 360 procedures.
Comments
On average, 8 people were assigned to a 2.5-hour laparoscopic procedure in the hospitals studied. When we categorized the role of each team member, we found that the anesthesiologists and surgeons assigned to a procedure normally stayed for the entire surgery; however, the nurses often shifted their duties for varied reasons such as lunch, shift change, and coffee breaks. We found that the 2 nursing roles (scrub nurse and circulating nurse) were replaced more than once for each surgical
Conclusions
In this study, we have described the size and the composition of surgical teams for laparoscopic procedures. We found that each addition to the OR team significantly increased the PT independent of other factors. Understanding the surgical team size and composition will allow us to design better educational tools for improving team composition and communication, and to develop better management strategies to optimize surgical teams and facilitate OR efficiency. Efforts to improve OR efficiency
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Michael B. Ujiki, Dr. Tayyab S. Diwan, Dr. Georg O. Spaun, Dr. Yashodhan Khajanchee, Dr. Paul D. Hansen, and Dr. Alan Lomax for providing feedback during preparation of the manuscript.
References (22)
- et al.
The human factor in cardiac surgery: errors and near misses in a high technology medical domain
Ann Thorac Surg
(2001) - et al.
Human factors and cardiac surgery: a multicenter study
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
(2000) - et al.
Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals
Surgery
(2003) - et al.
Communication technology in trauma centers: a national survey
J Emerg Med
(2006) - et al.
The role of non-technical skills in anaesthesia: a review of current literature
Br J Anaesth
(2002) - et al.
Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model
Am J Surg
(1999) - et al.
Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites increase operating room efficiency
Surg Endosc
(2001) - et al.
Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects
Qual Saf Health Care
(2004) - et al.
Surgical crisis management skills training and assessment: a simulation[corrected]-based approach to enhancing operating room performance
Ann Surg
(2006) - et al.
An empirical study of the impact of team size on software development effort
Inf Technol Manage
(2007)