Elsevier

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volume 57, Issue 2, February 2013, Pages 382-389.e1
Journal of Vascular Surgery

Clinical research study
From the Midwestern Vascular Surgical Society
Outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair are equivalent between genders despite anatomic differences in women

Presented as a poster at the Thirty-sixth Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Vascular Surgical Society, Milwaukee, Wisc, September 6-8, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.075Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Objective

Prior work confirms gender-specific anatomic differences in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair, but the clinical implications remain ill defined. The purpose of this study was to compare gender-specific early outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair using a large international registry.

Methods

Over the 2-year period ending in 2011, 1,262 patients (131 women, 10.4%; 1,131 men, 89.6%) with infrarenal aneurysms treated with the Endurant stent graft were prospectively enrolled in the ENGAGE registry and followed clinically and radiographically.

Results

Women were older (75.5 ± 7.0 vs 72.8 ± 8.1; P = .0003) and had smaller aneurysms (57.8 ± 9.5 vs 60.6 ± 11.9 mm; P = .01). Women's infrarenal aortic necks were of narrower diameter (21.8 ± 3.4 vs 24.0 ± 3.5 mm; P < .0001), shorter length (24.3 ± 11.8 vs 27.3 ± 12.4 mm; P = .009), and greater angulation (37.7 ± 26.2° vs 29.4 ± 23.3°; P = .0002). More women had an infrarenal neck angle >60° (19.2% vs 9.1%; P = .001). Technical success was achieved in equal numbers of women and men (97.7% vs 99.2%; P = .10). On completion angiography, the incidence of any endoleak (21.5% vs 15.4%; P = .08) and type I endoleak (1.5% vs 1.1%; P = .60) did not differ between genders. At the 1-month follow-up, there were no differences between women and men with respect to endograft occlusion (2.5% vs 1.9%; P = .70), and differences observed in any endoleak (17.2% vs 11.4%; P = .08) and type I endoleaks (3.3% vs 1.2%; P = .08) did not reach statistical significance. Freedom from major adverse events was similar for women and men at 30 days (98.5% vs 95.8%; P = .23) and 1 year (85% vs 89.8%; P = .40). Survival at 30 days (100% vs 98.6%) and 1 year (92.5% vs 91.6%; P = .99) was similar for women and men.

Conclusions

This large multinational registry confirms the previously observed prevalence of suboptimal neck anatomy in women. Even though women have shorter and more angulated infrarenal necks, their technical outcomes at 30 days and clinical outcomes at 1 year were similar to those of men. Much longer follow-up is necessary to determine whether these outcomes proved durable.

Cited by (0)

Author conflict of interest: Drs Harris and DeRose have served as consultants for Medtronic.

Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org.

The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a conflict of interest.