Elsevier

Transplantation Proceedings

Volume 42, Issue 7, September 2010, Pages 2542-2546
Transplantation Proceedings

Renal transplantation
Complication: Other
Targeting Risk Factors for Impaired Wound Healing and Wound Complications After Kidney Transplantation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.05.162Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Because of potent immunosuppression, impaired wound healing and complications are frequent features after kidney transplantation (KTx).

Objective

To investigate the incidence and nature of impaired wound healing and complications at a single transplantation center in Norway.

Patients

Of 226 patients who underwent KTx, 199 (87%) were followed up prospectively for 1 year (2005) via close and meticulous wound inspection.

Results

The study revealed a high rate of wound complications (200–250/y) in a high-volume center. Fifty-four patients (27%) experienced prolonged wound healing, defined as gaps, secretions, or wound complications, at 3 to 5 weeks posttransplantation, and 41 patients (21%) had impaired wound healing, defined as gaps, secretions, or wound complications after 5 weeks posttransplantation. In total, 50 patients (25%) required surgical or radiologic reintervention. Complications included lymphocele in 29 patients (14.6%), wound dehiscence in 16 (8.0%), bleeding or hematoma in 10 (5.0%), and infection in 9 (4.5%). Risk factors associated with wound complications included recipient older than 60 years, body mass index greater than 30, hemoglobin concentration less than 10 g/dL, albumin concentration less than 36 g/dL, duration of surgery more than 200 minutes, no subcutaneous sutures, and sirolimus or everolimus therapy. At nominal and logistic regression analysis, recipient older than 60 years, body mass index greater than 30, and no subcutaneous sutures were independent risk factors.

Conclusion

Risk factor analysis and previous documentation suggest that wound complications might be counteracted using the following measures: subcutaneous sutures, predialysis transplantation, sealing or ligation of lymphatic trunks, prophylactic fenestration, reduction of corticosteroid load, and avoiding sirolimus/everolimus therapy.

Section snippets

Patients

From a cohort of 226 adult (>18 years) Norwegian patients who underwent kidney transplantation during 2005, 199 (87%) were included in the study. Those who underwent simultaneous kidney-pancreas or kidney-liver transplantation were excluded. After discharge from the transplantation-surgical department, recipients were followed up prospectively. Wound inspection and patient interviews were conducted 1 to 3 times per week until the wound was fully healed, which was defined as presence of no gaps

Results

Baseline characteristics of the 199 study patients including pretransplantation risk factors are given in Table 1. Only 51.8 % of wounds were fully healed at 3 weeks posttransplantation, and at 5 weeks, 20.6 % still were considered unhealed (Table 2). The Pearson χ2 test revealed statistically significant associations between secretions and lymphocele (P < .00) and between secretions and wound dehiscence (P < .00) (data not shown).

Bacteriologic analysis of secretions revealed primarily skin

Discussion

The primary findings in the present study was the high rate of impaired wound healing (21% at 5 weeks posttransplantation) and the high rate of reinterventions (25%). The threshold for considering a wound unhealed was low: no secretion or diastases. The immunosuppression therapy must be considered a major offender, accounting for the distinctly elevated level of complications and reinterventions, compared with similar procedures in the nonimmunosuppressed population. Most complications were due

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (65)

  • Is recipient's body mass index a determinant of short term complications in early renal transplantation?

    2020, Progres en Urologie
    Citation Excerpt :

    More recently, introduction of more potent antiproliferative drugs in particular mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus or everolimus have accentuated the incidence of wound complications. Several studies highlight deleterious effect of sirolimus [30–32]. Given the large number of different immunospressive combinations used in our population, this parameter could not be studied.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text