Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can Breast Surgeons Provide Breast Cancer Genetic Testing? An American Society of Breast Surgeons Survey

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Whether breast cancer surgeons are adequately trained, skilled, and experienced to provide breast cancer genetic assessment, testing, and counseling came under debate in September 2013 when a major third-party payer excluded nongenetics specialists from ordering such testing. A literature search having failed to uncover any study on breast surgeons’ skill and practice in this area, the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) surveyed its members on their experience with the recognized crucial components of such testing.

Methods

In late 2013, ASBrS e-mailed a link to an online questionnaire to its U.S. members (n = 2,603) requesting a self-assessment of skills and experience in genetic assessment, testing, interpretation, and counseling. After approximately 6 weeks, the results were collated and evaluated.

Results

By January 2, 2014, 907 responses (34.84 %) had arrived from breast surgeons nationwide working in academic settings (20 %), solo or small group private practice (39 %), large multispecialty groups (18 %), and other settings. More than half said they performed 3-generation pedigrees, ordered genetic testing, and provided pre- and posttest counseling. Most noted that they would welcome continuing educational support in genetics.

Conclusions

Currently the majority of breast surgeons provide genetic counseling and testing services to their patients. They report practices that meet or exceed recognized guidelines, including the necessary elements and processes for best practices in breast cancer genetics test counseling. Because breast cancer genetic testing is grossly underutilized relative to the size of the U.S. BRCA mutation carrier population, these appropriate services should not be restricted but rather supported and expanded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cho MK, Sankar P, Wolpe PR, Godmilow L. Commercialization of BRCA1/2 testing: practitioner awareness and use of a new genetic test. Am J Med Genet. 1999;83:157–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs. National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers: background statement. Available at: http://napbc-breast.org/. Accessed January 28, 2014.

  3. Genetic Evaluation and Management. Standard 2.16. Cancer risk assessment, genetic counseling and genetic testing services are provided or referred. In: 2013 breast center standards manual. National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2013. Available at: http://napbc-breast.org/standards/2013standardsmanual.pdf#52. Accessed January 29, 2014.

  4. Cigna medical coverage policy. Effective September 15, 2013. Genetic testing for susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer (e.g., BRCA1 and BRCA2). Available at: http://www.elsevierbi.com/~/media/Supporting%20Documents/The%20Gray%20Sheet/39/37/mm_0001_coveragepositioncriteria_genetic_testing_for_breast_and_ovarian_cancer.pdf/. Accessed January 29, 2014.

  5. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Policy statement: new Cigna policy on cancer genetic testing poses risks to high quality cancer care. September 6, 2013. Available at: http://www.asco.org/advocacy/new-cigna-policy-cancer-genetic-testing-poses-risks-high-quality-cancer-care/. Accessed January 29, 2014.

  6. Drohan B, Roche CA, Cusack JC Jr, Hughes KS. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and other hereditary syndromes: using technology to identify carriers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1732–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beitsch PD, Lerner AG, Laidley AL, Tafra L, Edwards MJ. Who are we and what do we think? Am J Surg. 2003;186:321–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schubart JR, Dominici LS, Farnan M, et al. Shared decision making in breast cancer: national practice patterns of surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3323–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chipman J, Drohan B, Blackford A, Parmigiani G, Hughes K, Bosinoff P. Providing access to risk prediction tools via the HL7 XML-formatted risk Web service. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140:187–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu KH, Wood ME, Daniels M, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology expert statement: collection and use of a cancer family history for oncology providers. J Clin Oncol., 2014; 32(8):833–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Biswas S, Atienza P, Chipman J, et al. Simplifying clinical use of the genetic risk prediction model BRCAPRO. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139:571–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas and The BayesMendel Group. CancerGene: BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation probabilities. Available at: http://www4.utsouthwestern.edu/breasthealth/cagene/. Accessed February 22, 2014.

  13. Starting a high-risk program with risk models. Premeeting course, 15th annual meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons, Las Vegas, NV, April 30–May 4, 2014. Available at: https://www.breastsurgeons.org/new_layout/annual_meeting2014/premeeting_courses.php/. Accessed February 22, 2014.

  14. Risk assessment course. 24th Interdisciplinary Breast Center Conference, National Consortium of Breast Centers. Las Vegas, NV, March 15–19, 2014. Available at: http://www2.breastcare.org/ncbc-conference-tickets/. Accessed February 22, 2014.

  15. Surgeon assessment for hereditary cause of breast cancer quality measure. American Society of Breast Surgeons, March 7, 2011. Available at: https://www.breastsurgeons.org/new_layout/about/statements/QM/ASBrS_Hereditary_cause_of_breast_cancer.pdf/. Accessed February 22, 2014.

  16. Schwartz MD, Valdimarsdottir HB, Peshkin BN, et al. Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014, 32(7):618–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Madlensky L. Is it time to embrace telephone genetic counseling in the oncology setting? J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(7):611–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The survey described in this article was funded, produced, disseminated, and collated by the American Society of Breast Surgeons, Columbia, Maryland. The authors are grateful to the Board of Directors of the American Society of Breast Surgeons for advancing the genetic testing survey project, reviewing a draft of this article, and lending critical guidance. Important suggestions were made by board members Hiram S. Cody III, MD, FACS; Sarah Fredrickson, MD, FACS; V. Suzanne Klimberg, MD, FACS; Funda Merrick-Bernstram, MD, FACS; and especially Steven L. Chen, MD, MBA, FACS, and Jeffrey Landercasper, MD, FACS. The staff of the American Society of Breast Surgeons contributed invaluable technical development, operational management, and data management of the Society’s Genetic Counseling and Testing Survey. Marcia Ringel provided editorial support.

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pat W. Whitworth MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beitsch, P.D., Whitworth, P.W. Can Breast Surgeons Provide Breast Cancer Genetic Testing? An American Society of Breast Surgeons Survey. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 4104–4108 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3711-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3711-9

Keywords

Navigation