Educational and career outcomes of an internal medicine preceptorship for first-year medical students

J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jun;14(6):341-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00352.x.

Abstract

Objective: Medical educators have attempted in recent years to provide quality clinical experiences for medical students early in their medical training. We questioned whether participating in a preceptorship in internal medicine (PIM) resulted in better performances on subsequent clinical rotations and increased interest in internal medicine.

Participants: Fifty-four students have participated in the PIM to date, with control groups consisting of students who applied for it but were not selected (n = 36), students participating in a preceptorship in family medicine (n = 168), and the remaining students (n = 330).

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: University medical center and community practices.

Intervention: A 2-month, clinical preceptorship following the first year of medical school.

Measurements and main results: The following outcomes were assessed: scores in the introduction to clinical medicine course; grades in the medical ethics course; scores from the internal medicine clerkship; and choosing a career in internal medicine. In their second year, PIM students scored higher in both semesters of the introduction to clinical medicine course (87% and 86% vs 84% and 84%, p's <.01) and were more likely to receive honors in ethics (50% vs 29%, p <.01) than non-PIM students. During the internal medicine clerkship, PIM students' scores were significantly higher on an objective structured clinical examination (79% vs 76%, p =.05), ambulatory clinical evaluations (80% vs 76%, p <.01), and overall clerkship scores (78% vs 75%, p =.03) but not on inpatient clinical evaluations or on the National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Examination. Preceptorship students were more likely to receive honors grades in the medicine clerkship (33% vs 10%, p <.01), and they were more likely to match into internal medicine residencies than control students (54% vs 27%, p <.01).

Conclusions: The PIM course is an intervention, early in students' careers, which appears to benefit them academically and increase their interest in internal medicine as a career.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Career Choice*
  • Clinical Competence / standards*
  • Education, Medical, Undergraduate / standards*
  • Educational Measurement*
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Internal Medicine / education*
  • Preceptorship / standards*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Students, Medical