Long-term survival and health-related quality of life of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003 Apr;25(4):350-3. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1880.

Abstract

Introduction: the outcome of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) patients is most frequently measured as operative or in-hospital mortality rate. However, survival alone is not an indicator of quality of the treatment. Assessment of quality of life (QoL) is used increasingly and is a relevant measure of outcome.

Objective: to assess long-term survival and QoL of patients undergoing repair of RAAA.

Design: follow-up study with cross-sectional QoL evaluation.

Materials and methods: between 1996 and 2000, 199 of 220 patients with RAAA underwent surgery. Survivors were sent the generic the RAND 36-item Health Survey (RAND-36) self-administered questionnaire.

Results: total hospital mortality and operative mortality were 103 of 220 (47%) and 82 of 199 (41%). Of the 117 initial survivors, 21 were deceased at the time of the study. When compared to an age- and sex-adjusted general population, only physical functioning was significantly impaired (p=0.01) in the 82 of 93 (88%) RAAA survivors who responded.

Conclusions: survivors after repair of RAAA had almost the same QoL as the norms of an age- and sex-adjusted general population, justifies an aggressive operative policy in RAAA.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / complications*
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / mortality*
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / surgery
  • Aortic Rupture / etiology*
  • Aortic Rupture / mortality*
  • Aortic Rupture / surgery
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Health Status*
  • Health Surveys
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality of Life*
  • Survival Rate*
  • Time Factors