Background: Conventional wisdom suggests high-quality care for most patients with hip fractures is surgical fixation within 24 hours to reduce mortality and complications, although there is little evidence to support this standard.
Objectives: We sought to determine the relationship between timing of hip fracture surgery and early mortality.
Design and subjects: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of 3981 patients with hip fractures>60 years of age that were admitted to hospitals in one Canadian health region from 1994-2000.
Methods: We collected sociodemographic, prefracture comorbidity, and postoperative complication data. Timing of surgery was classified as within 24 hours ("early surgery," the referent group for all analyses), 24-48 hours, and beyond 48 hours. Main outcome was in-hospital mortality. We used multivariable logistic regression methods, including adjustments with propensity scores and a validated hip fracture-specific mortality index, to determine the independent association between early versus later surgery and mortality.
Results: Median age of patients was 82 years, 71% were women, and 26% had >4 prefracture comorbidities. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was 6%; it was 5% for those who had surgery within 24 hours or from 24 to 48 hours, 10% for surgery beyond 48 hours, and 21% for patients that did not have surgery. Compared with those who had surgery within 24 hours, there was no independent association between timing of surgery and in-hospital mortality (24-48 hours, adjusted odds ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.30, P=0.55; beyond 48 hours 1.30, 95% confidence interval 0.86-2.00], P=0.21).
Conclusions: The timing of surgical fixation of hip fracture was not associated with early mortality in carefully adjusted analyses, and the use of "surgery within 24 hours" as a measure of high quality care may be inappropriate.