Assessment of comparative skills between hand-assisted and straight laparoscopic colorectal training on an augmented reality simulator

Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Sep;53(9):1323-7. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e263f1.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare skills sets during a hand-assisted and straight laparoscopic colectomy on an augmented reality simulator.

Methods: Twenty-nine surgeons, assigned randomly in 2 groups, performed laparoscopic sigmoid colectomies on a simulator: group A (n = 15) performed hand-assisted then straight procedures; group B (n = 14) performed straight then hand-assisted procedures. Groups were compared according to prior laparoscopic colorectal experience, performance (time, instrument path length, and instrument velocity changes), technical skills, and operative error.

Results: Prior laparoscopic colorectal experience was similar in both groups. Both groups had better performances with the hand-assisted approach, although technical skill scores were similar between approaches. The error rate was higher with the hand-assisted approach in group A, but similar between both approaches in group B.

Conclusions: These data define the metrics of performance for hand-assisted and straight laparoscopic colectomy on an augmented reality simulator. The improved scores with the hand-assisted approach suggest that with this simulator a hand-assisted model may be technically easier to perform, although it is associated with increased intraoperative errors.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Competence*
  • Colectomy / standards*
  • Colorectal Surgery / education*
  • Colorectal Surgery / standards*
  • Computer Simulation*
  • Computer-Assisted Instruction*
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy / standards*
  • Psychomotor Performance
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Task Performance and Analysis
  • User-Computer Interface