Objective: To compare the appropriateness of use of coronary angiography (CA) and bypass surgery (CABS) in the early 1980s in one Canadian hospital and several American hospitals using explicit case-based criteria. Procedure rates were much lower in Canada during this period.
Subjects: Canadian subjects, 502 Manitoba residents undergoing CA at one hospital in 1981-82 were tracked forward to determine whether and when they underwent CABS. CA comparisons were made with 351 Canadian patients aged 55 years or older; 1677 American CA patients aged 65 years or older and were drawn in 1981 from three hospitals. Two hundred and forty-five patients undergoing CABS within 12 months of CA made up the Canadian sample. American CABS patients were sampled from three hospitals during 1979-82. Manitoba patients assigned to medical treatment after CA were also appraised.
Methods: Criteria were derived by an American panel of clinicians following a Delphi process; indications were rated appropriate, equivocal and inappropriate. A trained abstractor reviewed charts and assigned ratings. Results of exercise electrocardiograms were not available in the Manitoba data set, hence sensitivity analyses were performed to determine how differing proportions of positive exercise electrocardiograms might affect the Manitoba results.
Results: Even assuming only 50% of treadmill tests were positive in the Manitoba sample, the proportion of inappropriate CA was lower in Manitoba than for the American hospitals: 9% versus 15 to 18%. For CABS, only one of the three comparison American hospitals approached the Manitoba hospital level of appropriateness.
Conclusions: In the early 1980s, there was more appropriate use of CA and CABS in a Manitoba hospital compared with several American hospitals. Many Canadian patients undergoing CA and treated medically met American indications for appropriate use of CABS. Whether this represents underprovision of necessary care remains uncertain.