Rectal tumours--MR imaging with endorectal and/or phased-array coils, and histopathological staging on giant sections. A comparative study

Acta Radiol. 1997 May;38(3):437-44. doi: 10.1080/02841859709172097.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the accuracy of MR imaging in the preoperative staging of patients with clinically resectable rectal tumours.

Material and methods: Forty-eight consecutive patients with rectal tumours were examined, 29 with a pelvic phased-array coil and 19 with a multi-coil arrangement including a pelvic phased-array coil and an endorectal coil. MR images and histopathological specimens and sections were reviewed independently and tumours were staged according to the TNM classification.

Results: A more complete visualisation of the various layers of the rectal wall was achieved on the endorectal MR images than on the pelvic phased-array images. The sensitivity of MR in correctly staging T3 tumours compared with histopathology was 81% with a specificity of 82%. Penetration of the rectal wall was predicted with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 87%. Sensitivity and specificity in predicting lymph node metastases was 83% and 74% respectively.

Conclusion: MR imaging with both pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils allowed the preoperative staging of rectal tumours with a high degree of accuracy.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Female
  • Forecasting
  • Humans
  • Lymphatic Metastasis
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / instrumentation
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Invasiveness
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Pelvis
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Rectal Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Rectal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Rectum / pathology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity