Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CJS
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CJS

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CJS on Twitter
Case Note

Gastric outlet obstruction

Ruth O’Carroll and Renee Kennedy
CAN J SURG December 01, 2007 50 (6) E29-E30;
Ruth O’Carroll
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Renee Kennedy
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Foreign-body ingestion in adults is relatively uncommon. Unintentional ingestions are usually those of meat or fish bones. Concurrent alcohol consumption is often a contributing factor. Intentional ingestions are more common occurrences in those who are intellectually impaired, have psychiatric illness, are prisoners or are edentulous.1,2

Previously published guidelines have demonstrated that 80%–90% of foreign bodies reaching the gastrointestinal tract will pass spontaneously, 10%–20% require endoscopic intervention and 1% require a surgical procedure.1,2

We present a case of gastric outlet obstruction, unusual in that it was caused by intentional ingestion of a large foreign body.

Case report

A 31-year-old man presented to the emergency department after swallowing a 45-cm long, 2.5-cm diameter doubleended dildo. As there was a shoelace securely attached to the object, the patient had attempted to retrieve the object himself but was unsuccessful.

The patient appeared to be in mild distress with a shoelace hanging out of his mouth. His abdomen was moderately distended but not tender. Radiographs confirmed the presence of a large object in the stomach extending into the proximal duodenum (Fig. 1).

FIG. 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1

Radiograph demonstrating a large foreign object in the stomach, extending into the proximal duodenum.

An attempt at endoscopic removal was unsuccessful because one end of the dildo abutted the fundus of the stomach. The patient underwent gastrotomy to retrieve the offending object. He had recently eaten, so he had a full stomach. The foreign body was traversing the pylorus causing duodenal obstruction. There was no evidence of gastrointestinal perforation or necrosis. Apart from a minor wound infection, the patient had smooth recovery. He returned approximately 12 weeks later with acute abdominal pain secondary to gallstone pancreatitis.

Discussion

Management of foreign-body ingestion is influenced by the patient’s age and clinical condition, the size, shape and classification of the ingested material, the anatomic location in which the object is lodged and the technical abilities of the endoscopist.3 Many reports discuss the challenges of retrieving “sharp” foreign objects, but the difficulty in managing large foreign objects is less well described.

If a foreign body reaches the stomach, it will likely pass without incident. However, there are 3 sites where an object may fail to pass once it has negotiated the esophagus: the pylorus, the duodenal C-loop and the ileocecal valve. Objects longer than 5 cm, or more than 2.5 cm in diameter will have difficulty passing through the pylorus. Objects more than 10 cm long, such as a toothbrush or a spoon, cannot negotiate the duodenal C-loop secondary to its fixed retroperitoneal position. In either case, these objects should be endoscopically removed as soon as possible to avoid pressure necrosis and gastric perforation.4 If endoscopic removal fails, surgery is warranted. Finally, if the object successfully passes these potential obstruction points, it can get lodged at the ileocecal valve, the narrowest portion of the small bowel. Surgical intervention may be required if it has not passed within a week or if the patient becomes symptomatic.3

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Accepted July 25, 2007.

References

  1. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guideline for the management of ingested foreign bodies. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:622–5.
    1. Kirk AD,
    2. Bowers BA,
    3. Moylan JA,
    4. et al
    . Toothbrush swallowing. Arch Surg 1988; 123:382–4.
    1. Wahbeh G,
    2. Wyllie R,
    3. Kay M
    . Foreign body ingestion in infants and children: location, location, location. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2002;41:633–40.
    1. Eisen GM,
    2. Baron TH,
    3. Dominitz JA,
    4. et al
    . Guideline for the management of ingested foreign bodies. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55:802–6.

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Submit a manuscript

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CJS represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

View CMA's Accessibility policy.

Powered by HighWire