Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CJS
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CJS

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CJS on Twitter
Correspondence

Drs. Fried and Derossis reply

Gerald M. Fried and Anna M. Derossis
CAN J SURG December 01, 1999 42 (6) 470;
Gerald M. Fried
Division of General Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna M. Derossis
Division of General Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We agree in part with the criticism of Schlachta and colleagues that our conclusion that the simulator we used “is a valuable tool for training and evaluation of basic tasks in laparoscopic surgery” is not substantiated by the methods used. However, our article is only one of several that have been presented at national and international peer-reviewed meetings and have been published or accepted for publication in this and other peer-reviewed journals.1–3

Validity is a matter of degree and does not exist on an all-or-none basis. Finding a significant correlation between performance scores and level of training from junior to senior residents suggests a degree of construct validity. Further, in this pilot study, where residents were followed through their training, residents’ scores and the total score increased as they underwent more training in 2 out of 3 tasks. Practice effects could confound such results; however, these residents were only evaluated at 2 points in time and had no practice on the simulator in the interim. The original 7 inanimate tasks developed1 were modelled after fundamental laparoscopic techniques rather than isolated psychomotor skills, thus adding face validity. Face validity was further ensured by consensus of more than 20 well-known advanced laparoscopic surgeons that these tasks were meaningful representations of components of laparoscopic surgery. In another study2 we found that residents who practised in this inanimate model performed better in a live animal model and acquired skill more quickly than a peer group at the same PGY3 level of training who had not practised in the inanimate model. The scores in the animate model for the group that practised were also superior to those of the group without practice,3 and the scores in the inanimate model correlated significantly with analogous skills measured in the live animal in the operating room.2 All of these data support the validity of the inanimate system for measuring laparoscopic skills.

We agree that this model will require further validation by ultimately correlating performance in the model with level of surgical skill in the operating room. At this point there is no measure of skill in the operating room that can act as the “gold standard.” We are in the process of conducting a large multicentre study to test the reliability and validity of such a scoring system.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Derossis AM,
    2. Fried GM,
    3. Abrahamowicz M,
    4. Sigman HH,
    5. Barkun JS,
    6. Meakins JL
    . Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 1998;175:482–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Fried GM,
    2. Bothwell J,
    3. Derossis AM,
    4. Sigman HH
    . Comparison of laparoscopic performance in vivo with performance measured in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc (in press)
  3. ↵
    1. Derossis AM,
    2. Bothwell J,
    3. Sigman HH,
    4. Fried GM
    . The effect of practice on performance in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 1998;12:1117–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Journal of Surgery: 42 (6)
CAN J SURG
Vol. 42, Issue 6
1 Dec 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CJS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Drs. Fried and Derossis reply
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CJS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CJS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Drs. Fried and Derossis reply
Gerald M. Fried, Anna M. Derossis
CAN J SURG Dec 1999, 42 (6) 470;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Drs. Fried and Derossis reply
Gerald M. Fried, Anna M. Derossis
CAN J SURG Dec 1999, 42 (6) 470;
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • Evaluating laparoscopic skills
  • Slipped capital femoral epiphysis
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Submit a manuscript

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CJS represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

View CMA's Accessibility policy.

Powered by HighWire