Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CJS
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CJS

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CJS on Twitter
Editorial

Effect of surgeon fatigue on hip and knee arthroplasty

Christopher Peskun, David Walmsley, James Waddell and Emil Schemitsch
CAN J SURG April 01, 2012 55 (2) 81-86; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.032910
Christopher Peskun
From the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Walmsley
From the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Waddell
From the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emil Schemitsch
From the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: There is growing support in the literature that patient outcomes are adversely affected by physician fatigue in operator-dependent cognitive and technical tasks. Recent increases in total joint arthroplasty caseloads have resulted in longer operative days and increased surgeon fatigue. We sought to determine if time of day predicts perioperative complications and outcomes in total joint arthroplasty.

Methods: The records of all total hip and knee arthroplasties (THA; TKA) performed for primary osteoarthritis in one calendar year at one large university hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, surgery start time and duration, intraoperative complications, radiographic component alignment and functional outcome scores (SF-12 and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) were collected and analyzed using linear and nonparametric rank correlation statistics. Data were corrected for sex, body mass index, surgeon and postcall operating days.

Results: In the THA cohort (n = 341), a later surgery start time was significantly related to duration of surgery (p = 0.004, mean difference −7.1 min). There was a trend toward significance between a later surgery start time and intraoperative femur fracture (p = 0.05). Postoperative complications, component alignment and functional outcome scores were not significantly affected by surgery start time. There were no significant findings for any of the intraoperative or postoperative outcomes in the TKA cohort (n = 292).

Conclusion: Duration of surgery and incidence of intraoperative complications for THA may increase with later surgery start time; however, the relatively small statistical differences observed imply that they likely are not clinically significant.

In an effort to reduce wait times associated with joint replacement surgery, the overall arthroplasty caseload in the province in Ontario has increased by more than 50% in the past 5 years.1,2 As a result, the number of total joint arthroplasties being performed during a surgical day has also increased. Many surgeons now perform 5 or 6 total joint operations in a single day, with operative working hours approaching 10. There is no doubt that this increased caseload has led to increased surgeon fatigue, particularly for cases performed at the end of the operating day compared with those performed at the beginning.

There is growing support in the literature that patient outcomes are adversely affected by fatigue in operator-dependent cognitive and technical tasks. Adverse events and medical errors have been shown to occur more frequently in sleep-deprived physicians, and technical skills have also been shown to be negatively influenced by physician fatigue.3–9 More specifically, laparoscopic procedures,10 cardiac interventions,11 endotracheal intubation12 and colonoscopies13,14 have been shown to have inferior outcomes when performed later in the day. These findings potentially have implications for physician productivity, procedural outcome and, most importantly, patient safety.

There are many factors that contribute to the outcome of total joint arthroplasty, including preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables. It is well established that preoperative variables, such as unrealistic patient expectations,15–18 diabetic control19,20 and obesity,21–23 can have a negative effect on radiologic and functional outcomes. Fortunately, these variables are modifiable and therefore have the potential to be optimized preoperatively. Postoperative variables, such as participation in rehabilitation and avoidance of limb positions that may predispose to hip dislocation, are also modifiable variables that have been shown to affect outcome.24,25 The influence of intraoperative variables on outcomes in total joint arthroplasty have been less extensively studied. Duration of the surgical procedure,26,27 blood loss28 and component alignment29–33 are modifiable intraoperative variables that influence patient outcomes and may be adversely affected by surgeon fatigue. To our knowledge, the extent to which fatigue affects the technical and cognitive skills of the surgeon and overall patient outcomes in total joint arthroplasty has not previously been studied.

The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine whether there is a difference, in terms of perioperative and postoperative complications, between patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at different times during the operative day.

Methods

All patients treated with primary THA or TKA during the 2007 calendar year at a single academic university hospital were identified using hospital medical records. Patients with inflammatory arthritis, hip dysplasia, posttraumatic deformity, bilateral single-stage procedures or resurfacing procedures were excluded from the THA cohort. Patients with inflammatory arthritis, previous intra-articular fracture, posttraumatic deformity or bilateral single-stage procedures were excluded from the TKA cohort. Review of hospital database records was undertaken to verify diagnosis and operative procedure.

After obtaining institutional research ethics board approval, we reviewed the hospital charts for each study participant. A data abstraction form was used to gather information regarding age, sex, body mass index (BMI), attending surgeon, date of surgery, surgeon postcall days, anesthetic type (general v. spinal), start time of surgery, duration of surgery, intraoperative complications (arterial injury, nerve injury, periprosthetic fracture, medical complication), length of stay in hospital, number of days in the intensive care unit (ICU), units of blood products transfused, postoperative complications (myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolus, infection, intestinal ileus, urinary tract infection), need for revision surgery, readmission within 30 days, SF-1234 scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)35 scores and radiographic component alignment. The surgeon postcall days variable was used to indicate the days on which a surgeon performed total joint arthroplasty surgery after a night of being on call. Data acquisition was reviewed and verified in duplicate before statistical analysis.

All patients in the THA cohort had uncemented femoral and acetabular components placed through either a posterior or direct lateral approach. Two surgeons used a posterior approach exclusively, and 1 surgeon used a lateral approach exclusively. All patients in the TKA cohort had cemented femoral and tibial components with intramedullary femoral alignment and extramedullary tibial alignment. All patients participated in a physiotherapy program postoperatively. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis was used until the time of discharge from hospital.

Patient-centered functional outcome data (SF-12 physical health component, SF-12 mental health component and WOMAC scores) were recorded preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. Radiographic analysis was performed 3 months postoperatively to record the acetabular component inclination angle and femoral component varus/valgus angle in the THA cohort. In the TKA cohort, the tibial component varus/valgus angle was recorded.

Statistical analysis

We performed all statistical analyses using Minitab (State College, Pennsylvania) software. Descriptive statistical methods were used to calculate frequencies, means and standard deviations. Nonparametric rank-correlation statistics were used to compare data within the THA and TKA cohorts. We used the Spearman rank order test to compare continuous outcome variables, and we used the point biserial test to compare binary outcome variables. Time of day was chosen as the independent predictor variable for both the Spearman and point biserial tests. The outcome variables included duration of surgery, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, functional outcome scores and radiographic parameters. We considered results to be significant at p < 0.05.

We constructed a multivariate regression analysis model to correct for the effects of confounding variables. The predictor variables for the model were age, sex, BMI, attending surgeon, surgeon postcall days and surgery start time. The outcome variables were intraoperative complications, duration of surgery, component alignment and functional outcome scores.

Results

Patient identification

A search of the hospital database records identified 341 patients treated with THA and 292 patients treated with TKA by 3 surgeons during the 2007 calendar year. The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients who underwent THA or TKA at a single centre in 2007

Total hip arthroplasty cohort

In the THA cohort, 133 (39.0%) patients were male, with an average age of 60.7 (range 14–90) years and a mean BMI of 29.2 (15.4–57.8). The distribution of cases among the 3 surgeons were 153, 57 and 131, respectively. There were 51 postcall operating days for the 3 surgeons combined. The mean number of cases per operating day was 3.1 (range 1–7). The mean duration of surgery was 76.1 (range 45–170) minutes.

The outcomes of patients are summarized in Table 2. There were 10 intraoperative complications (9 periprosthetic fractures and 1 cardiac arrest). There were 9 cases of superficial infection and 2 cases of deep prosthetic infection requiring 2-stage revision procedures. The average difference between preoperative and 3-month postoperative functional outcome scores were 8.4 on the SF-12 physical health component, 3.9 on the SF-12 mental health component and 29.6 on the WOMAC. The average inclination angle for the acetabular component was 43.9° (range 20°–66°). The total number of acetabular components exceeding an inclination angle of 45° was 29 (8.5%). The average deviation from anatomically neutral alignment for the femoral component was 1.3° of valgus (3° valgus to 8° varus). The total number of femoral components positioned in greater than 3° of anatomic varus or valgus was 30 (8.8%).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Surgical outcomes of patients who underwent THA or TKA at a single centre in 2007

The Spearman rank order test identified a significant association between duration of surgery and later surgery start time (p = 0.004, rs = 0.145, t = 2.69; Table 3). However, the mean difference in duration between the first and fourth quartiles of surgery start time was 7.1 minutes. The point biserial test revealed a trend toward significance between intraoperative periprosthetic femur fracture and a later surgery start time (p = 0.05, pb = 0.09, t = 1.61). There were no postoperative complications associated with surgery start time, and there were no significant relations between surgery start time and any of the functional outcome measures.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Rank order correlation statistics

Multivariate regression analysis using a combined continuous and binomial variable model was used to control for possible simultaneous confounding effects of predictor variables (age, sex, BMI, surgeon and surgeon postcall days). After correcting for all confounding variables, surgery start time remained a significant predictor of duration of surgery (p = 0.029). No other predictor variable was found to be significantly related to any outcome variable.

Total knee arthroplasty cohort

In the TKA cohort, 84 (28.8%) patients were male, with an average age of 65.7 (27–91) years and average BMI of 33.4 (17.4–81.6). The distribution of cases among the 3 surgeons was 79, 120 and 93, respectively. There were 51 postcall operating days for the 3 surgeons combined. The mean number of cases per operating day was 3.1 (range 1–7). The mean duration of surgery was 79.8 (range 40–180) minutes.

The outcomes of patients are summarized in Table 2. There were 7 intraoperative complications (6 periprosthetic fractures/femoral notches and 1 popliteal artery injury). There were 18 cases of superficial infection and no cases of deep prosthetic infection. The average change between preoperative and 3-month postoperative functional outcome scores was 5.1 on the SF-12 physical health component, 0.2 on the SF-12 mental health component and 28.2 on the WOMAC. The average deviation from mechanically neutral alignment for the tibial component was 1.7° of varus (3° valgus to 6° varus). The total number of tibial components positioned in greater than 3° of anatomic varus or valgus was 23 (7.9%).

There were no significant findings in the TKA cohort with respect to surgery start time when using either the Spearman rank order test or the point biserial test for all continuous and binomial outcome variables (Table 3).

Discussion

There are numerous variables that determine the radiographic and functional outcomes of total joint arthroplasty. These variables may be temporally stratified into preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative categories, and they also can be stratified based on whether or not they are modifiable. The identification and optimization of modifiable variables may ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes. Surgeon fatigue may be an underappreciated modifiable variable that has widespread effects across multiple intraoperative domains.

Our study population had similar baseline characteristics to those reported in recent studies examining outcomes of primary THA and TKA.36,37 In addition, values for mean duration of surgery, intraoperative complications and functional outcome scores were comparable. These studies validate our results with respect to patient demographic and clinical characteristics, operative complications and functional outcomes.

In the present study, duration of surgery in the THA cohort was significantly associated with a later surgery start time. This finding may be partially explained by increasing surgeon fatigue throughout the operative day leading to longer procedures, although other factors, including BMI, sex, proportion of the case performed by a trainee and difficulty of the case, likely contributed.38 In our analysis, BMI and sex were not found to be significantly associated with duration of surgery. In addition, at the study institution, there is no standardized difference in the proportion of the case performed by a trainee based on time of day. Increasing case difficulty would likely result in longer durations; however, the exclusion criteria ensured that only routine primary THAs were included in the analysis.

There are several benefits to shorter duration of surgery for THA, including a decreased infection rate27,39 and increased residual operating room resources. Presumably, the decreased infection rate is based on the fact that the operative wound is exposed to the outside environment longer with prolonged surgery, although there is no universally accepted threshold value for which the risk of infection increases. The duration of surgery in our study ranged from 45 to 170 minutes; however, the mean difference in duration between the first and fourth quartiles of surgery start time was only 7.1 minutes. This difference is likely too small to result in clinically important outcomes. In addition, in this study there were only 2 cases of deep prosthetic infection; therefore, no statistical association between infection rate and surgery start time could be demonstrated.

There was a trend toward significance between a later surgery start time and intraoperative periprosthetic femur fracture. Increasing surgeon fatigue later in the operative day may contribute to decreased vigilance with respect to protecting the femur against intraoperative fracture; however, other factors likely contributed to this finding. Previous studies have identified age, sex and osteoporosis as risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic fracture.40,41 Our analysis showed no differences with respect to age, sex and osteoporosis in patients who experienced a periprosthetic fracture. The difference in incidence between the first and fourth quartiles of surgery start time was 3 fractures (1 v. 4). Although these complications did not ultimately result in functionally compromised outcomes, they did cause inconvenience for the patient owing to an alteration in postoperative weight-bearing status and physiotherapy protocols.

There were no significant differences between surgery start time and any outcome variables in the TKA cohort, possibly because TKA is relatively resistant to fluctuations in surgical time based on fatigue because the incorporation of alignment guides and anatomic verifications standardize TKA to a greater extent than THA.37,38 Furthermore, the intraoperative complication rate in terms of risk of intraoperative periprosthetic fracture is lower overall in TKA compared with THA.

Limitations

This retrospective cohort study has several limitations. First, the patients included in this review were not randomly allocated to a surgery start time. Rather, patients were arbitrarily scheduled for surgery by their attending surgeons. There may have been a predilection for scheduling more technically challenging cases earlier or later in the operative day based on surgeon preference. However, in an attempt to control for variability in case difficulty, we excluded patients undergoing revision procedures and those with a diagnosis of nonprimary osteoarthritis. Second, owing to the relatively low number of intraoperative complications in this study, a more definitive association with respect to surgery start time was difficult to obtain. If the number of patients studied was larger, there would be a greater potential to show a significant difference. Finally, there are numerous factors in addition to the time of day that contribute to physical and cognitive fatigue among surgeons. Despite the fact that we controlled for operating on a postcall day and the specific surgeon performing the procedure, it is reasonable to assume that other extraneous factors may have confounded the results. However, through the use of multivariate analysis, we attempted to standardize the data and control for these uncertainties.

Conclusion

Recently, the medical literature has identified physician fatigue as a risk factor for complications in operator-dependent cognitive and technical tasks. The present study demonstrates that duration of surgery and the incidence of intraoperative complications for THA may increase with later surgery start time. An appreciation of the balance between surgeon fatigue and operative caseload may allow for more efficient use of allocated operating room resources and a lower intraoperative complication rate. These findings should be taken into consideration when planning operative lists involving THA.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Contributors: C. Peskun and E. Schemitsch designed the study. D. Walmsley acquired the data, which C. Peskun and J. Waddell analyzed. C. Peskun wrote the article, which all authors reviewed and approved for publication.

  • Accepted July 8, 2011.

References

  1. ↵
    (2009) Hip and Knee Replacements in Canada: Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR) 2008–2009 Annual Report (Canadian Institute for Health Information, Ottawa (ON)).
  2. ↵
    1. Ontario Wait Times
    Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, [web-site of the Ministry] Available: www.waittimes.net/surgerydi/En/Type.aspx. accessed 2010 July 27.
  3. ↵
    1. Wesnes KA,
    2. Walker MB,
    3. Walker LG,
    4. et al
    .Cognitive performance and mood after a weekend on call in a surgical unit.Br J Surg 1997;84:493–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Weinger MB,
    2. Ancoli-Israel S
    .Sleep deprivation and clinical performance.JAMA 2002;287:955–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Leff D,
    2. Aziz O,
    3. Darzi A
    .Trucks, planes, and scalpels: Is there an evidence-based approach to surgeons’ working hours?.Arch Surg 2007;142:817–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Koslowsky M,
    2. Babkoff H
    .Meta-analysis of the relationship between total sleep deprivation and performance.Chronobiol Int 1992;9:132–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kelz RR,
    2. Freeman KM,
    3. Hosokawa PW,
    4. et al
    .Time of day is associated with postoperative morbidity: an analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program data.Ann Surg 2008;247:544–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rothschild JM,
    2. Keohane CA,
    3. Rogers S,
    4. et al
    .Risks of complications by attending physicians after performing nighttime procedures.JAMA 2009;302:1565–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Grantcharov TP,
    2. Bardram L,
    3. Funch-Jensen P,
    4. et al
    .Laparoscopic performance after one night on call in a surgical department: prospective study.BMJ 2001;323:1222–3.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Taffinder NJ,
    2. McManus IC,
    3. Gul Y,
    4. et al
    .Effect of sleep deprivation on surgeons’ dexterity on laparoscopic simulator.Lancet 1998;352:1191
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Kuon E,
    2. Dahm JB,
    3. Schmitt M,
    4. et al
    .Time of day influences patient radiation exposure from percutaneous cardiac interventions.Br J Radiol 2003;76:189–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Wright MC,
    2. Phillips-Bute B,
    3. Mark JB,
    4. et al
    .Time of day effects on the incidence of anesthetic adverse events.Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:258–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Sanaka MR,
    2. Deepinder F,
    3. Thota PN,
    4. et al
    .Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates than morning colonoscopies.Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2726–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Wells CD,
    2. Heigh RI,
    3. Sharma VK,
    4. et al
    .Comparison of morning versus afternoon cecal intubation rates.BMC Gastroenterol 2007;7:19–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Lingard EA,
    2. Sledge CB,
    3. Learmonth ID
    .Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia.J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:1201–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Howell SM,
    2. Rogers SL
    .Method for quantifying patient expectations and early recovery after total knee arthroplasty.Orthopedics 2009;32:884–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bourne RB,
    2. Chesworth BM,
    3. Davis AM,
    4. et al
    .Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: Who is satisfied and who is not?.Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:57–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Mahomed NN,
    2. Liang MH,
    3. Cook EF,
    4. et al
    .The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty.J Rheumatol 2002;29:1273–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Schiavone Panni A,
    2. Cerciello S,
    3. Vasso M,
    4. et al
    .Stiffness in total knee arthroplasty.J Orthop Traumatol 2009;10:111–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Moon HK,
    2. Han CD,
    3. Yang IH,
    4. et al
    .Factors affecting outcome after total knee arthroplasty in patients with diabetes mellitus.Yonsei Med J 2008;49:129–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Dowsey MM,
    2. Liew D,
    3. Stoney JD,
    4. et al
    .The impact of pre-operative obesity on weight change and outcome in total knee replacement: a prospective study of 529 consecutive patients.J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:513–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jackson MP,
    2. Sexton SA,
    3. Yeung E,
    4. et al
    .The effect of obesity on the mid-term survival and clinical outcome of cementless total hip replacement.J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:1296–300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Gillespie GN,
    2. Porteous AJ
    .Obesity and knee arthroplasty.Knee 2007;14:81–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Moffet H,
    2. Collet JP,
    3. Shapiro SH,
    4. et al
    .Effectiveness of intensive rehabilitation on functional ability and quality of life after first total knee arthroplasty: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:546–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Munin MC,
    2. Rudy TE,
    3. Glynn NW,
    4. et al
    .Early inpatient rehabilitation after elective hip and knee arthroplasty.JAMA 1998;279:847–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Peersman G,
    2. Laskin R,
    3. Davis J,
    4. et al
    .Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty.HSS J 2006;2:70–2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Cordero-Ampuero J,
    2. de Dios M
    .What are the risk factors for infection in hemiarthroplasties and total hip arthroplasties?.Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:3268–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Moonen AF,
    2. Neal TD,
    3. Pilot P
    .Peri-operative blood management in elective orthopaedic surgery. A critical review of the literature.Injury 2006;37:S11–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Berend ME,
    2. Ritter MA,
    3. Meding JB,
    4. et al
    .Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;428:26–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jaffe WL,
    2. Hawkins CA
    .Normalized and proportionalized cemented femoral stem survivorship at 15 years.J Arthroplasty 1999;14:708–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Munuera L,
    2. Garcia-Cimbrelo E
    .The femoral component in low-friction arthroplasty after ten years.Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992279163–75.
    1. Vresilovic EJ,
    2. Hozack WJ,
    3. Rothman RH
    .Radiographic assessment of cementless femoral components. Correlation with intraoperative mechanical stability.J Arthroplasty 1994;9:137–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Perillo-Marcone A,
    2. Barrett DS,
    3. Taylor M
    .The importance of tibial alignment: finite element analysis of tibial malalignment.J Arthroplasty 2000;15:1020–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Ware J Jr.,
    2. Kosinski M,
    3. Keller SD
    .A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.Med Care 1996;34:220–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Bellamy N,
    2. Buchanan WW,
    3. Goldsmith CH,
    4. et al
    .Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.J Rheumatol 1988;15:1833–40.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Wülker N,
    2. Lambermont JP,
    3. Sacchetti L,
    4. et al
    .A prospective randomized study of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional surgery.J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:1584–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Woolson ST,
    2. Kang MN
    .A comparison of the results of total hip and knee arthroplasty performed on a teaching service or a private practice service.J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:601–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Kosashvili Y,
    2. Mayne IP,
    3. Trajkovski T,
    4. et al
    .Influence of sex on surgical time in primary total knee arthroplasty.Can J Surg 2010;53:256–60.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Willis-Owen CA,
    2. Konyves A,
    3. Martin DK
    .Factors affecting the incidence of infection in hip and knee replacement: an analysis of 5277 cases.J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:1128–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Sarvilinna R,
    2. Huhtala HS,
    3. Puolakka TJ,
    4. et al
    .Periprosthetic fractures in total hip arthroplasty: an epidemiologic study.Int Orthop 2003;27:359–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Abendschein W
    .Periprosthetic femur fractures — a growing epidemic.Am J Orthop 2003;32Suppl34–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Journal of Surgery: 55 (2)
CAN J SURG
Vol. 55, Issue 2
1 Apr 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CJS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effect of surgeon fatigue on hip and knee arthroplasty
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CJS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CJS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Effect of surgeon fatigue on hip and knee arthroplasty
Christopher Peskun, David Walmsley, James Waddell, Emil Schemitsch
CAN J SURG Apr 2012, 55 (2) 81-86; DOI: 10.1503/cjs.032910

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Effect of surgeon fatigue on hip and knee arthroplasty
Christopher Peskun, David Walmsley, James Waddell, Emil Schemitsch
CAN J SURG Apr 2012, 55 (2) 81-86; DOI: 10.1503/cjs.032910
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Arthroplasty

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Submit a manuscript

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CJS represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

View CMA's Accessibility policy.

Powered by HighWire