Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CJS
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CJS

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CJS on Twitter
Discussions in Surgery

Surgeon attitudes toward point of care ultrasound for biliary disease: a nationwide Canadian survey

Jennifer Koichopolos, Richard Hilsden, Frank Myslik, Drew Thompson, Jeremy Vandelinde and Rob Leeper
Can J Surg February 01, 2020 63 (1) E9-E12; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.010218
Jennifer Koichopolos
From the Division of Emergency Medicine, Western University, London, Ont. (Thompson, Myslik); the Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont. (Koichopolos, Leeper); the Division of Critical Care Medicine, Western University, London, Ont. (Leeper); and the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. (Vandelinde)
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Hilsden
From the Division of Emergency Medicine, Western University, London, Ont. (Thompson, Myslik); the Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont. (Koichopolos, Leeper); the Division of Critical Care Medicine, Western University, London, Ont. (Leeper); and the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. (Vandelinde)
MD, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Myslik
From the Division of Emergency Medicine, Western University, London, Ont. (Thompson, Myslik); the Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont. (Koichopolos, Leeper); the Division of Critical Care Medicine, Western University, London, Ont. (Leeper); and the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. (Vandelinde)
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Drew Thompson
From the Division of Emergency Medicine, Western University, London, Ont. (Thompson, Myslik); the Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont. (Koichopolos, Leeper); the Division of Critical Care Medicine, Western University, London, Ont. (Leeper); and the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. (Vandelinde)
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy Vandelinde
From the Division of Emergency Medicine, Western University, London, Ont. (Thompson, Myslik); the Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont. (Koichopolos, Leeper); the Division of Critical Care Medicine, Western University, London, Ont. (Leeper); and the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. (Vandelinde)
BSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rob Leeper
From the Division of Emergency Medicine, Western University, London, Ont. (Thompson, Myslik); the Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont. (Koichopolos, Leeper); the Division of Critical Care Medicine, Western University, London, Ont. (Leeper); and the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. (Vandelinde)
MD, MEHP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1

    Number of consults per year from emergency department on the basis of point of care ultrasound for suspected biliary disease.

  • Fig. 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2

    Confidence in diagnostic information on the basis of point of care ultrasound in patients with biliary disease.

Tables

  • Figures
  • FactorResponses considered staff level, frequent, high sensitivity or management alteringResponses considered trainee level, infrequent, low sensitivity or not altering management
    Level of training—Staff surgeon (> 10 years practice)Staff surgeon (< 10 years practice)FellowSenior resident (years 3–5)Junior resident (years 1–2)
    Frequency that PoCUS results are used in practiceVery oftenSomewhat oftenOccasionallyRarelyNever—
    Frequency of performing PoCUS personally in practiceVery oftenSomewhat oftenOccasionallyRarelyNever—
    Frequency of referrals based on PoCUS-diagnosed biliary disease> 20 times10–20 times5–10 times3–5 times1–2 timesNever
    Perceived sensitivity of PoCUS for cholelithiasis90%–100%80%–90%70%–80%60%–70%50%–60%< 50%
    Perceived sensitivity of PoCUS for cholecystitis90%–100%80%–90%70%–80%60%–70%50%–60%< 50%
    Ability to admit, diagnose and/or operate based on PoCUS findingsYes, definitelyLikely yesMaybeLikely noNo, definitely not—
    • PoCUS = point of care ultrasound.

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Clinical decision-making using biliary PoCUS

    ScenarioDecision; no. (%)
    Yes, definitelyLikely yesMaybeLikely noNo, definitely not
    A patient presents with a history consistent with unremitting biliary colic and normal blood work. Is the finding of gallstones on PoCUS enough for you to
    Admit overnight for unremitting biliary colic14 (10.9)43 (33.3)37 (28.7)23 (17.8)12 (9.3)
    Diagnose biliary colic14 (10.9)32 (24.8)47 (36.4)26 (20.2)10 (7.8)
    Operate for biliary colic6 (4.7)9 (7.0)15 (11.7)31 (24.2)67 (52.3)
    A patient presents with elevated white count, RUQ pain and normal bilirubin. Are the findings of sonographic Murphy sign and gallstones on PoCUS enough for you to
    Admit overnight for cholecystitis31 (24.0)44 (34.1)32 (24.8)14 (10.9)8 (6.2)
    Diagnose cholecystitis15 (11.6)32 (24.8)40 (31.0)28 (21.7)15 (11.6)
    Operate for cholecystitis7 (5.4)9 (7.0)17 (13.3)37 (28.9)58 (45.3)
    • PoCUS = point of care ultrasound; RUQ = right upper quadrant.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Factors associated with level of confidence in biliary PoCUS results

    Factorχ2p value
    Frequency that PoCUS results are used in practice3.870.05
    Frequency that PoCUS is performed personally in practice6.730.01
    Level of training0.030.88
    Previous PoCUS training0.730.39
    Awareness of emergency physician use of PoCUS for biliary disease0.340.56
    Frequency of referrals for PoCUS-diagnosed biliary disease1.360.24
    Perceived sensitivity of PoCUS for cholelithiasis7.770.01
    Perceived sensitivity of PoCUS for cholecystitis6.570.01
    Concern for variability in emergency physician performing the test0.140.71
    Ability to replicate PoCUS test results5.820.02
    Availability of formal online report3.690.05
    • PoCUS = point of care ultrasound.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Journal of Surgery: 63 (1)
Can J Surg
Vol. 63, Issue 1
1 Feb 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CJS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Surgeon attitudes toward point of care ultrasound for biliary disease: a nationwide Canadian survey
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CJS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CJS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Surgeon attitudes toward point of care ultrasound for biliary disease: a nationwide Canadian survey
Jennifer Koichopolos, Richard Hilsden, Frank Myslik, Drew Thompson, Jeremy Vandelinde, Rob Leeper
Can J Surg Feb 2020, 63 (1) E9-E12; DOI: 10.1503/cjs.010218

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Surgeon attitudes toward point of care ultrasound for biliary disease: a nationwide Canadian survey
Jennifer Koichopolos, Richard Hilsden, Frank Myslik, Drew Thompson, Jeremy Vandelinde, Rob Leeper
Can J Surg Feb 2020, 63 (1) E9-E12; DOI: 10.1503/cjs.010218
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Submit a manuscript

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. Print ISSN 0008-428X; Online ISSN 1488-2310.

All editorial matter in CJS represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

 

Powered by HighWire