Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CJS
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CJS

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CJS on Twitter
Review
Open Access

Impact of outpatient total hip or knee replacement on informal caregivers at home: a scoping review

Braeden M. Page, David R. Urbach, Jesse I. Wolfstadt, Olivia Varkul, Natalie Clavel and Richard Brull
CAN J SURG March 17, 2023 66 (2) E150-E155; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.010022
Braeden M. Page
From the Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Page, Brull, Urbach); the Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Page, Urbach); the Department of Surgery, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Urbach, Wolfstadt); the Department of Surgery, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Urbach); the Granovsky Gluskin Division of Orthopaedics, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ont. (Wolfstadt); the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont. (Varkul); and the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Clavel, Brull)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David R. Urbach
From the Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Page, Brull, Urbach); the Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Page, Urbach); the Department of Surgery, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Urbach, Wolfstadt); the Department of Surgery, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Urbach); the Granovsky Gluskin Division of Orthopaedics, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ont. (Wolfstadt); the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont. (Varkul); and the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Clavel, Brull)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jesse I. Wolfstadt
From the Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Page, Brull, Urbach); the Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Page, Urbach); the Department of Surgery, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Urbach, Wolfstadt); the Department of Surgery, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Urbach); the Granovsky Gluskin Division of Orthopaedics, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ont. (Wolfstadt); the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont. (Varkul); and the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Clavel, Brull)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivia Varkul
From the Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Page, Brull, Urbach); the Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Page, Urbach); the Department of Surgery, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Urbach, Wolfstadt); the Department of Surgery, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Urbach); the Granovsky Gluskin Division of Orthopaedics, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ont. (Wolfstadt); the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont. (Varkul); and the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Clavel, Brull)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalie Clavel
From the Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Page, Brull, Urbach); the Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Page, Urbach); the Department of Surgery, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Urbach, Wolfstadt); the Department of Surgery, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Urbach); the Granovsky Gluskin Division of Orthopaedics, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ont. (Wolfstadt); the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont. (Varkul); and the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Clavel, Brull)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Brull
From the Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Page, Brull, Urbach); the Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Page, Urbach); the Department of Surgery, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Urbach, Wolfstadt); the Department of Surgery, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Urbach); the Granovsky Gluskin Division of Orthopaedics, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ont. (Wolfstadt); the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont. (Varkul); and the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Clavel, Brull)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) offer significant cost savings to our health care system, the degree to which the burden of postoperative care has been transferred onto the informal caregiver is often overlooked. We performed a scoping review to identify the characteristics and factors that contribute to the burden of care experienced after outpatient THA and TKA.

Methods: We systematically searched electronic literature databases according to scoping review guidelines from inception to June 2021 for articles reporting the experiences of informal caregivers providing care for patients having undergone outpatient THA or TKA. Our review included English-language studies that sought to elucidate the impact on caregivers in the acute postoperative period (up to 6 wk after surgery).

Results: Our search yielded 1423 unique articles, which were screened for inclusion. We removed 310 duplicate records and excluded another 1099 articles because they did not meet the inclusion criteria for full-text screening with relevancy. We thus assessed 14 articles for full-text review, and none were found to meet our inclusion criteria.

Conclusion: We found no published data pertaining to the burden borne by informal caregivers who provide perioperative care to patients who have undergone ambulatory THA or TKA. Further research is needed to identify, quantify and determine the modifiability of the various characteristics and factors that contribute to caregiver burden in the outpatient setting.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are 2 of the most common and successful surgical procedures performed worldwide, with more than 120 000 primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures performed annually in Canada.1 Traditionally, patients undergoing a TJA procedure would remain in hospital for nearly 5 days after surgery to be monitored for pain management and rehabilitation. However, recent advances in perioperative care and management of surgery-related adverse effects have led to the development and implementation of outpatient TJA programs in Canada, allowing patients to return home on the same day of surgery.1 The transition from a short-stay inpatient setting to an outpatient TJA setting offers substantial benefits to both the patient and the health care system, including increased patient satisfaction, reduced rates of hospital-acquired infections2,3 and a median cost savings of 30% compared to inpatient surgery.4 However, the impact of this transition on informal caregivers, such as family and friends who provide care to patients at home once they leave the hospital, remains poorly understood.

Caregiver burden is the response to the emotional, financial, physical, psychologic and social stressors incurred with having to care for another person.5 Existing literature examining informal caregiver burden focuses largely on provision of care for a loved one dealing with a chronic disease, such as dementia, in an outpatient setting. In the chronic setting, 1 in 3 caregivers report experiencing depression, and caregivers also often report high levels of anxiety and stress, financial strain, sleep deprivation and social isolation.5–11 However, these findings are unlikely to be generalizable to the acute postoperative outpatient setting, such as caregivers of patients who have undergone outpatient TJA. Unlike long-term caregivers, whose burden of care increases as the patient’s condition deteriorates, informal caregivers of patients who have had TJA initiate the caregiving process with the burden of care at its high point, after which it declines and ultimately resolves once the patient has recovered and no longer requires assistance from the caregiver.

Given the relative novelty of outpatient TJA programs in Canada, we performed a scoping review to identify and map the available evidence pertaining to factors that contribute to the burden of care of caregivers of patients who have undergone outpatient TJA.12–14 Our objectives were to identify the characteristics and factors that contribute to the burden of care of such caregivers, as well as the modifiable and actionable contributors of caregiver burden to help mitigate the burden experienced by the caregiver during the episode of care.

Methods

This scoping review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).15,16 To minimize the risk of selection bias, we defined our inclusion and exclusion criteria a priori. Our protocol for this scoping review has been registered on Open Science Framework and can be found at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4KPAX.

Search strategy

To identify articles that reported the experiences of informal caregivers caring for patients after outpatient THA or TKA, we performed a comprehensive literature search of the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (including Epub Ahead of Print), Embase, EMCare Nursing, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO (OvidSP), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), Scopus (Elsevier), ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP). We searched the databases for all relevant English-language articles from their respective inception dates to Nov. 20, 2020. We repeated the same search in June 2021 before final analyses to ensure the identification of any recent studies that met the inclusion criteria. The search strategy included a combination of MeSH terms and non-MeSH keywords (Appendix 1, available at www.canjsurg.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cjs.010022/tab-related-content) and was developed in collaboration with the information specialist at our institution.

Selection criteria

We included studies examining the experiences of adult (age > 18 yr) caregivers considered to be informal caregivers (defined as nonprofessional people providing care for another person in a home setting17) caring for patients after primary THA or TKA in an outpatient setting. To ensure that our review focused solely on the outpatient setting, only studies in which patients were discharged on the same calendar day of surgery were eligible. This is distinct from the term “outpatient” often used in the literature, meaning the patient is discharged within 23 hours after surgery, and the stay may include an overnight stay.1

We considered articles that examined the experiences of the informal caregiver to identify the most important factors contributing to caregiver burden, including the emotional, physical, psychologic and social stressors associated with having to care for another person.5

Descriptive and observational study designs, including cross-sectional, case–control, and prospective and retrospective cohort studies, were eligible regardless of the year of publication and geographic location. Studies that included relevant surveys or questionnaires with appropriate outcome data were considered for inclusion, in addition to systematic reviews, provided they were peer-reviewed. Additional inclusion criteria included abstracts relevant to the topic, studies in which the impact on caregivers was measured within the acute postoperative period (up to 6 wk after surgery) and studies in the English language.

We excluded studies focusing on patients who underwent THA or TKA and were discharged after a short overnight stay. Studies that investigated the transition toward outpatient surgical pathways and did not specifically aim to evaluate the perspective of key stakeholders such as caregivers were also excluded. Studies that measured the impact on caregivers beyond the acute postoperative period were excluded, as this duration may limit the caregiver’s ability to recall the caregiving experience.

Caregiver burden domains

To facilitate data collection, we aimed to categorize the various characteristics and factors that contributed to the burden of care under 6 domains: caregiving environment, caregiver-specific factors, dimensions of caregiving, duration of care, intensity of dependence and type of surgical procedure. We created these domains based on the dementia-related literature, in addition to our own experiences and interactions with patients undergoing outpatient TJA at our institution and their caregivers.18 Table 1 provides examples of factors that may contribute to the burden of care experienced by the caregiver, by domain.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Characteristics and factors that may contribute to the burden of care experienced by the informal caregiver, organized by domain

Data extraction and analysis

Each title and abstract was screened independently by 2 reviewers (B.M.P. and O.V.). Removal of duplicates and screening were performed with Covidence software (Veritas Health Innovation). The full text of studies identified as being relevant was retrieved and screened to ensure that the concept, context and population met the inclusion criteria before a detailed independent full-text review by the 2 reviewers. Any disagreements were resolved with the help of a third reviewer (R.B.).

Two reviewers (B.M.P. and O.V.) independently extracted all relevant data into a collaborative data extraction form (Microsoft Excel). To check the accuracy and quality of all extracted data, each entry was cross-referenced in duplicate by the reviewers. Once articles were selected, the following data were recorded: author(s), country, year of publication, study design (e.g., qualitative/quantitative, caregiver recruitment methods), sample size, characteristics of participants (e.g., type of surgery, mean age), and related findings concerning characteristics and factors identified as having contributed to the burden of care experienced by the caregiver. The identified characteristic or factor was then assigned to the relevant caregiver burden domain and presented in the form of a narrative summary.

Methodologic quality and risk of bias

An assessment of the methodologic quality (risk of bias) of included studies was not performed; such an assessment is not commonly done for scoping reviews.15,16 Studies were not excluded because of their methodologic quality.

Results

In total, we identified 1423 articles in the literature search, of which 310 were removed as duplicates. Of the 1113 articles that were screened, we excluded 1099 because the article concept, context or population did not meet the inclusion criteria (Figure 1). After full-text analysis of the 14 remaining articles, all 14 articles were excluded (Table 2), for the following reasons: the article focused on inpatient TJA (n = 10), the outcomes of the study were not relevant to understanding factors contributing to the burden of care of informal caregivers (n = 3), and the impact on caregivers was measured beyond the acute postoperative period (n = 1). Therefore, no articles met our inclusion criteria, and no data were available for extraction.

Fig. 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1

Flow diagram showing search strategy.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Studies excluded after full-text evaluation, with rationale for exclusion

Discussion

We performed a scoping review to identify the characteristics and factors contributing to the burden of care experienced by informal caregivers after outpatient TJA. Our primary finding was that, to our knowledge, there are no studies investigating the factors contributing to caregiver burden in outpatient TJA.

More than 50% of TJA procedures are expected to be performed on an outpatient basis by 2026,33 and, as health care systems work toward relieving the strain and surgical backlog caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the development of shorter-stay TJA programs has accelerated even further.34 The unknown and unmeasured impact on informal caregivers has the potential to become an important societal problem. Aside from the financial, social and work-related stressors these caregivers experience, there is also the potential for health-related stressors. Based on our outpatient TJA program experience, the informal caregiver is most commonly the patient’s spouse, is of similar age as the patient and, in the typical TJA population, has his or her own comorbidities. Among inpatients having undergone TJA, factors such as age,35 employment status,35 gender,27 amount of assistance provided by the caregiver,27 relationship to the patient25 and perioperative phase36 have been shown to be significant predictors of caregiver strain. Although it is reasonable to assume that these nonmodifiable predictors of caregiver strain in inpatient TJA would also be generalizable to outpatient TJA, there are likely additional modifiable factors that contribute to strain that are unique to caregivers of patients who have had outpatient TJA.

With outpatient TJA, the burden of care, including more acute caregiving needs such as mobility, medication dispensing, hygiene, toileting and food preparation, is transferred to the informal caregiver mere hours post-operatively. Based on our clinical experience, caregivers often highlight the need to be available 24 hours a day beginning immediately on discharge from hospital and lasting for at least the first 3 days postoperatively in order to tend to the patient’s needs. Therefore, one modifiable factor would be to share the caregiving responsibilities with additional caregivers, especially on the day of surgery and first postoperative day, when the burden of care is at its peak. In addition, the physical demands placed on caregivers of patients who have had outpatient TJA may differ from those of inpatient caregivers, who traditionally initiate caregiving on postoperative day 2 and may have a better understanding of the physical demands and responsibilities after engaging with the in-hospital physical therapist. As such, although the outpatient’s spouse or first-degree relative may be the most obvious and comfortable choice as caregiver, the physical burden underscores the need for a physically capable caregiver, who may not be available to all patients.

Finally, another factor that is readily modifiable and likely to contribute to the burden of care in the immediate postoperative period is the health literacy of the caregiver; i.e., the ability of the caregiver to find, understand and use information to inform health-related decisions and actions for themselves and others.37 Indeed, outpatient caregivers have reported added stress and confusion when important health-related information is missing or not well known.19 Identifying caregivers well in advance of surgery and providing targeted high-yield education may better prepare the caregiver for common caregiving tasks and reduce the caregiver burden.

Limitations

This scoping review applied a systematic and rigorous search strategy to retrieve articles relevant to our research objectives. However, only publications in English were considered for inclusion, which may have induced language bias and may have omitted relevant studies published in other languages. No studies were found to have met our inclusion criteria, and, thus, no studies were included in our final analysis. We recognize that, even if data were available, any findings from a given country may not be generalizable to the next, given the differences in health care systems and available resources. For example, some same-day TJA programs in the United States offer visits by home care nurses,38,39 at-home physical therapy38–40 and calls by the lead surgeon on postoperative day 1,41,42 which may contribute to a lesser burden of care placed on the caregiver. These resources are not routinely available in many Canadian settings. Finally, we recognize that, by including only studies in which patients were discharged on the same calendar day as surgery, we excluded “ambulatory surgery” studies, wherein patients are discharged from hospital after a 23-hour stay. However, we believe that the burden of care for caregivers who begin the caregiving process after an overnight stay is materially different from that of caregivers who start the caregiving process on the same calendar day of surgery. For example, given that the local anesthetic used in regional blocks wears off anywhere from 6 to 8 hours after surgery, the first postoperative night is arguably the most painful for the patient and most burdensome for the caregiver. In addition, caregivers who begin the caregiving process after a 23-hour overnight stay may have a better understanding of how to deal with pain management, having had the opportunity to work with the in-hospital nursing team.

Conclusion

This scoping review underlines the substantial gap in knowledge surrounding the characteristics and factors that contribute to the burden of care experienced by informal caregivers in the acute postoperative period after outpatient TJA. Future research to identify, quantify and determine the modifiability of characteristics and factors that contribute to the burden of care is required to develop and inform strategies aiming to lessen the strain placed on caregivers and improve their caregiving experience.

Acknowledgement

Braeden Page acknowledges Women’s College Research Institute for providing support during the completion of his degree.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: Jesse Wolfstadt reports payments for advisory board work from MicroPort Orthopedics and for consultant work from DePuy Synthes. No other competing interests were declared.

  • Contributors: B. Page, D. Urbach, J. Wolfstadt, N. Clavel and R. Brull designed the study. B. Page and R. Brull acquired the data, which B. Page, D. Urbach, J. Wolfstadt, O. Varkul and R. Brull analyzed. B. Page and R. Brull wrote the manuscript, which all authors critically revised. All authors gave final approval of the article to be published.

  • Funding: Braeden Page is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research through the Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship – Master’s (CGS M). Olivia Varkul was supported by The Arts and Science Undergraduate Society at Queen’s University through the Arts & Science Undergraduate Research Fund Award. Richard Brull receives research time support from the Evelyn Bateman/Cara Operations Chair in Ambulatory Anesthesia and Women’s Health, Women’s College Hospital, and the Merit Awards Program, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto.

  • Accepted October 12, 2022.

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bodrogi A,
    2. Dervin GF,
    3. Beaulé PE
    . Management of patients undergoing same-day discharge primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. CMAJ 2020;192:E34–9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Kelly MP,
    2. Calkins TE,
    3. Culvern C,
    4. et al
    . Inpatient versus outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty: Which has higher patient satisfaction? J Arthroplasty 2018;33:3402–6.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Brophy RH,
    2. Bansal A,
    3. Rogalski BL,
    4. et al
    . Risk factors for surgical site infections after orthopaedic surgery in the ambulatory surgical center setting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019;27:e928–34.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Huang A,
    2. Ryu JJ,
    3. Dervin G
    . Cost savings of outpatient versus standard inpatient total knee arthroplasty. Can J Surg 2017;60:57–62.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Etters L,
    2. Goodall D,
    3. Harrison BE
    . Caregiver burden among dementia patient caregivers: a review of the literature. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2008;20:423–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Novak M,
    2. Guest C
    . Application of a multidimensional caregiver burden inventory. Gerontologist 1989;29:798–803.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sallim AB,
    2. Sayampanathan AA,
    3. Cuttilan A,
    4. et al
    . Prevalence of mental health disorders among caregivers of patients with Alzheimer disease. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015;16:1034–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Robinson BC
    . Validation of a caregiver strain index. J Gerontol 1983; 38:344–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Cheng ST
    . Dementia caregiver burden: a research update and critical analysis. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2017;19:64.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Pinquart M,
    2. Sörensen S
    . Differences between caregivers and non-caregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging 2003;18:250–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Torti FM,
    2. Gwyther LP,
    3. Reed SD,
    4. et al
    . A multinational review of recent trends and reports in dementia caregiver burden. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2004;18:99–109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Arksey H,
    2. O’Malley L
    . Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005;8:19–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. The difference between a systematic review & scoping review. Melbourne (Australia): Covidence. Available: https://www.covidence.org/blog/the-difference-between-a-systematic-review-and-a-scoping-review/ (accessed 2022 Feb. 24).
  9. ↵
    1. Munn Z,
    2. Peters MDJ,
    3. Stern C,
    4. et al
    . Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18:143–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Tricco AC,
    2. Lillie E,
    3. Zarin W,
    4. et al
    . PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:467–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Peters MDJ,
    2. Godfrey CM,
    3. Khalil H,
    4. et al
    . Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015;13:141–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Chiao CY,
    2. Wu HS,
    3. Hsiao CY
    . Caregiver burden for informal caregivers of patients with dementia: a systematic review. Int Nurs Rev 2015;62:340–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Page BM,
    2. Urbach DR,
    3. Wolfstadt JI,
    4. et al
    . Beast of burden? Understanding the impact of outpatient total hip and knee replacement on caregivers at home. Can J Anaesth 2022;69:423–6.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Churchill L,
    2. Pollock M,
    3. Lebedeva Y,
    4. et al
    . Optimizing outpatient total hip arthroplasty: perspectives of key stakeholders. Can J Surg 2018;61:370–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Bull MJ,
    2. Boaz L,
    3. Maadooliat M,
    4. et al
    . Preparing family caregivers to recognize delirium symptoms in older adults after elective hip or knee arthroplasty. J Am Geriatr Soc 2017;65:e13–7.
    OpenUrl
    1. Shepperd S,
    2. Harwood D,
    3. Jenkinson C,
    4. et al
    . Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. I: three month follow up of health outcomes. BMJ 1998;316:1786–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Weichih Chen D,
    2. Tsai YF,
    3. Chung SC,
    4. et al
    . Development and validation of a caregiving needs inventory for family members before their older relative’s knee joint-replacement surgery. Disabil Rehabil 2021;43:853–60.
    OpenUrl
    1. Berthelsen C,
    2. Kristensson J
    . The effect of spouses’ involvement through case management in older patients’ fast-track program (SICAM). ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02561637; 2015. Available: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02561637?id=NCT02561637&draw=2&rank=1&load=cart (accessed 2021 July 29).
    1. Berthelsen CB,
    2. Kristensson J
    . The SICAM-trial: evaluating the effect of spouses’ involvement through case management in older patients’ fast-track programmes during and after total hip replacement. J Adv Nurs 2017;73:112–26.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Stark ÅJ,
    2. Salanterä S,
    3. Sigurdardottir AK,
    4. et al
    . Spouse-related factors associated with quality of recovery of patients after hip or knee replacement — a Nordic perspective. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs 2016;23:32–46.
    OpenUrl
    1. Zietek P,
    2. Zarzycka B,
    3. Zietek J,
    4. et al
    . The impact of caregivers’ anxiety on patients’ anxiety before fast-track knee arthroplasty. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2017;84:292–8.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Zomar BO,
    2. Bryant DM,
    3. Marsh JD,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of informal caregiver assistance and strain with total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2021;36:2424–2430.e1.
    OpenUrl
    1. Zomar BO,
    2. Marsh JD,
    3. Lanting BA,
    4. et al
    . A protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating the safety and cost-effectiveness of outpatient total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020;21:663.
    OpenUrl
    1. Jester R
    . Early discharge to hospital at home: Should it be a matter of choice? J Orthop Nurs 2003;7:64–9.
    OpenUrl
    1. Berthelsen CB,
    2. Kristensson J
    . A sense of security: spouses’ experiences of participating in an orthopaedic case management intervention (the SICAM-trial). Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs 2017;24:21–30.
    OpenUrl
    1. Tseng MY,
    2. Yang CT,
    3. Liang J,
    4. et al
    . A care model for elderly hip-fractured persons with cognitive impairment and their family caregivers. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03894709; 2019. Available: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03894709 (accessed 2021 July 29).
    1. Berthelsen CB,
    2. Lindhardt T,
    3. Frederiksen K
    . Maintaining unity — relatives in older patients’ fast-track treatment programmes. A grounded theory study. J Adv Nurs 2014;70:2746–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Van Horne A,
    2. Van Horne J
    . Patient-optimizing enhanced recovery pathways for total knee and hip arthroplasty in Medicare patients: implication for transition to ambulatory surgery centers. Arthroplast Today 2019;5:497–502.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Gleicher Y,
    2. Peacock S,
    3. Peer M,
    4. et al
    . Transitioning to outpatient arthroplasty during COVID-19: time to pivot [letter]. CMAJ 2021;193:E455.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Zadzilka JD,
    2. Klika AK,
    3. Calvo C,
    4. et al
    . Caregiver burden for patients with severe osteoarthritis significantly decreases by one year after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018;33:3660–5.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Longo UG,
    2. Matarese M,
    3. Arcangeli V,
    4. et al
    . Family caregiver strain and challenges when caring for orthopedic patients: a systematic review. J Clin Med 2020;9:1497.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    What is health literacy? [Internet]. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/learn/index.html (accessed 2022 May 4).
  22. ↵
    1. Gogineni HC,
    2. Gray CF,
    3. Prieto HA,
    4. et al
    . Transition to outpatient total hip and knee arthroplasty: experience at an academic tertiary care center. Arthroplast Today 2018;5:100–5.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Weiser MC,
    2. Kim KY,
    3. Anoushiravani AA,
    4. et al
    . Outpatient total hip arthroplasty has minimal short-term complications with the use of institutional protocols. J Arthroplasty 2018;33:3502–7.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Berger RA,
    2. Sanders SA,
    3. Thill ES,
    4. et al
    . Newer anesthesia and rehabilitation protocols enable outpatient hip replacement in selected patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:1424–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Shah RP,
    2. Karas V,
    3. Berger RA
    . Rapid discharge and outpatient total joint arthroplasty introduce a burden of care to the surgeon. J Arthroplasty 2019;34:1307–11.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Kay RD,
    2. Taylor AJ,
    3. Tye EY,
    4. et al
    . Outpatient total hip and knee arthroplasty performed in a safety net hospital system. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2021;5:e21.00117.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Journal of Surgery: 66 (2)
CAN J SURG
Vol. 66, Issue 2
31 Mar 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CJS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of outpatient total hip or knee replacement on informal caregivers at home: a scoping review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CJS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CJS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Impact of outpatient total hip or knee replacement on informal caregivers at home: a scoping review
Braeden M. Page, David R. Urbach, Jesse I. Wolfstadt, Olivia Varkul, Natalie Clavel, Richard Brull
CAN J SURG Mar 2023, 66 (2) E150-E155; DOI: 10.1503/cjs.010022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Impact of outpatient total hip or knee replacement on informal caregivers at home: a scoping review
Braeden M. Page, David R. Urbach, Jesse I. Wolfstadt, Olivia Varkul, Natalie Clavel, Richard Brull
CAN J SURG Mar 2023, 66 (2) E150-E155; DOI: 10.1503/cjs.010022
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Submit a manuscript

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CJS represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

View CMA's Accessibility policy.

Powered by HighWire