Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CJS
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CJS

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Sections
    • Collections
  • Podcasts
  • Author Info
    • Overview for authors
    • Publication fees
    • Forms
    • Editorial policies
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Open access
  • Careers
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow CJS on Twitter
Research
Open Access

Birmingham Hip Resurfacing for osteoarthritis — a Canadian retrospective cohort study with a minimum 10-year follow-up

Jonathan Bourget-Murray, Scott J. Watt Kearns, Sophie Piroozfar, Jayd Lukenchuk, Kelly Johnston and Jason Werle
CAN J SURG May 03, 2022 65 (3) E296-E302; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.013320
Jonathan Bourget-Murray
From the University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Rockyview General Hospital & Alberta Hip and Knee Clinic, Calgary, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott J. Watt Kearns
From the University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Rockyview General Hospital & Alberta Hip and Knee Clinic, Calgary, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sophie Piroozfar
From the University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Rockyview General Hospital & Alberta Hip and Knee Clinic, Calgary, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jayd Lukenchuk
From the University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Rockyview General Hospital & Alberta Hip and Knee Clinic, Calgary, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelly Johnston
From the University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Rockyview General Hospital & Alberta Hip and Knee Clinic, Calgary, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason Werle
From the University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Rockyview General Hospital & Alberta Hip and Knee Clinic, Calgary, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1

    Anteroposterior radiograph showing the measurement of the abduction angle (inclination) of the cup.

  • Fig. 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2

    Survival curves following Birmingham hip resurfacing.

  • Fig. 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3

    Radiograph showing a patient who required revision surgery for a loose acetabular cup. The patient would be revised to a BHR dysplastic cup. BHR = Birmingham hip resurfacing.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Baseline patient characteristics, by gender

    CharacteristicMale
    n = 83
    Female
    n = 24
    Total
    n = 107
    Age, mean ± SD, yr50.3 ± 6.645.1 ± 8.149.1 ± 7.3
    BMI, mean ± SD, kg/m228.97 ± 5.025.87 ± 5.228.27 ± 5.2
    Follow-up, mean, yr12.2312.8112.37
    Hips, n (%)96 (75.6)31 (24.4)127 (100)
    BHR procedure, n
     Unilateral701787
     Bilateral*639
     Simultaneous7411
    • BHR = Birmingham hip resurfacing; SD = standard deviation.

    • ↵* Twenty-eight patients had bilateral BHRs at the last follow-up in June 2019; however, 19 of these patients (17 male, 2 female) had their second BHR performed < 10 years ago and, therefore, only their first BHR was included for data analysis.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Characteristics of the 11 patients who underwent BHR revision

    PatientAge, yr*Cup/head size, mmCup inclination†Time to revision, moReason for revision
    Male
     15362/5433.2°160Pseudotumour at 12 yr
     26664/5843.7°56Acetabular cup loosening
     36064/5841.1°105Femoral avascular necrosis with implant subsidence
     46256/5043.1°124Anterior acetabular impingement
     55758/5244.2°48Acetabular cup loosening
    Female
     15454/4835.6°110ALVAL/pseudotumour at 2 yr
     26752/4637.5°62Elevated whole-blood metal-ions at 4 yr
     33848/4245.9°78Periprosthetic fracture
     45950/4434.8°108Aseptic femoral loosening
     54148/4237.1°102Aseptic femoral loosening
     63354/4653.8°97Ongoing symptomatology
    • ALVAL = aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion; BHR = Birmingham hip resurfacing.

    • ↵* Age of the patient at the time of the index surgery.

    • ↵† Measurement of the abduction angle on standard anteroposterior radiographs, as described previously by De Haan et al.22

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Implant characteristics

    Characteristic% of patients*
    Acetabular cup inclination, mean ± SD (range)
    Males45.5° ± 6.0 (34.6°–57.2°)
    Females44.6° ± 5.9 (29.0°–58.9°)
    BHR implant size
    Head size, 42 mm
     Cup size, 48 mm3.5
     Cup size, 50 mm5.3
    Head size, 46 mm
     Cup size, 52 mm18.6
    Head size, 50 mm
     Cup size, 56 mm36.3
     Cup size, 58 mm0.9
    Head size, 52 mm
     Cup size, 58 mm10.6
    Head size, 54 mm
     Cup size, 60 mm15.0
     Cup size, 62 mm1.8
    Head size, 58 mm
     Cup size, 62 mm8.0
    • BHR = Birmingham hip resurfacing; SD = standard deviation.

    • ↵* Unless indicated otherwise.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Mean patient-reported outcome scores at final follow-up

    MeasureMalesFemalesp value
    HHS93.993.60.27
    UCLA8.207.2< 0.001
    VAS81.981.30.35
    • HHS = Harris Hip Score; UCLA = University of California, Los Angeles Activity Score; VAS = visual analogue scale.

Next
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Journal of Surgery: 65 (3)
CAN J SURG
Vol. 65, Issue 3
25 May 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CJS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Birmingham Hip Resurfacing for osteoarthritis — a Canadian retrospective cohort study with a minimum 10-year follow-up
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CJS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CJS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Birmingham Hip Resurfacing for osteoarthritis — a Canadian retrospective cohort study with a minimum 10-year follow-up
Jonathan Bourget-Murray, Scott J. Watt Kearns, Sophie Piroozfar, Jayd Lukenchuk, Kelly Johnston, Jason Werle
CAN J SURG May 2022, 65 (3) E296-E302; DOI: 10.1503/cjs.013320

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Birmingham Hip Resurfacing for osteoarthritis — a Canadian retrospective cohort study with a minimum 10-year follow-up
Jonathan Bourget-Murray, Scott J. Watt Kearns, Sophie Piroozfar, Jayd Lukenchuk, Kelly Johnston, Jason Werle
CAN J SURG May 2022, 65 (3) E296-E302; DOI: 10.1503/cjs.013320
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Publication Fees
  • Forms
  • Editorial Policies
  • Submit a manuscript

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 2291-0026

All editorial matter in CJS represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].

View CMA's Accessibility policy.

Powered by HighWire